An Overview of Models for Response Times and Processes in Cognitive Tests

被引:133
作者
De Boeck, Paul [1 ,2 ]
Jeon, Minjeong [3 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Psychol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Grad Sch Educ & Informat Studies, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
response time; response accuracy; cognitive tests; cognitive processes; psychometric models; local dependencies; automated and controlled processes; NUMERICAL REASONING SPEED; DIFFUSION DECISION-MODEL; CONDITIONAL-INDEPENDENCE; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; SLOW INTELLIGENCE; ITEM RESPONSES; ACCURACY; DEPENDENCE; TASK; COMPONENTS;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00102
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Response times (RTs) are a natural kind of data to investigate cognitive processes underlying cognitive test performance. We give an overview of modeling approaches and of findings obtained with these approaches. Four types of models are discussed: response time models (RT as the sole dependent variable), joint models (RT together with other variables as dependent variable), local dependency models (with remaining dependencies between RT and accuracy), and response time as covariate models (RT as independent variable). The evidence from these approaches is often not very informative about the specific kind of processes (other than problem solving, information accumulation, and rapid guessing), but the findings do suggest dual processing: automated processing (e.g., knowledge retrieval) vs. controlled processing (e.g., sequential reasoning steps), and alternative explanations for the same results exist. While it seems well-possible to differentiate rapid guessing from normal problem solving (which can be based on automated or controlled processing), further decompositions of response times are rarely made, although possible based on some of model approaches.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 98 条
[51]   A Race Model for Responses and Response Times in Tests [J].
Ranger, Jochen ;
Kuhn, Joerg-Tobias ;
Gaviria, Jose-Luis .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2015, 80 (03) :791-810
[52]   An accumulator model for responses and response times in tests based on the proportional hazards model [J].
Ranger, Jochen ;
Kuhn, Joerg-Tobias .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 67 (03) :388-407
[53]   A latent trait model for response times on tests employing the proportional hazards model [J].
Ranger, Jochen ;
Ortner, Tuulia .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 65 (02) :334-349
[54]   A flexible latent trait model for response times in tests [J].
Ranger, Jochen ;
Kuhn, Jorg-Tobias .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2012, 77 (01) :31-47
[55]   THEORY OF MEMORY RETRIEVAL [J].
RATCLIFF, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1978, 85 (02) :59-108
[56]   The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks [J].
Ratcliff, Roger ;
McKoon, Gail .
NEURAL COMPUTATION, 2008, 20 (04) :873-922
[57]   Diffusion Decision Model: Current Issues anc History [J].
Ratcliff, Roger ;
Smith, Philip L. ;
Brown, Scott D. ;
McKoon, Gail .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2016, 20 (04) :260-281
[58]  
Roskam E.E., 1987, Progress in mathematical psychology, V1, P151
[59]   The Lognormal Race: A Cognitive-Process Model of Choice and Latency with Desirable Psychometric Properties [J].
Rouder, Jeffrey N. ;
Province, Jordan M. ;
Morey, Richard D. ;
Gomez, Pablo ;
Heathcote, Andrew .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2015, 80 (02) :491-513
[60]  
Rupp A. A., 2010, DIAGNOSTIC MEASUREME