An Overview of Models for Response Times and Processes in Cognitive Tests

被引:133
作者
De Boeck, Paul [1 ,2 ]
Jeon, Minjeong [3 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Psychol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Grad Sch Educ & Informat Studies, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
response time; response accuracy; cognitive tests; cognitive processes; psychometric models; local dependencies; automated and controlled processes; NUMERICAL REASONING SPEED; DIFFUSION DECISION-MODEL; CONDITIONAL-INDEPENDENCE; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; SLOW INTELLIGENCE; ITEM RESPONSES; ACCURACY; DEPENDENCE; TASK; COMPONENTS;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00102
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Response times (RTs) are a natural kind of data to investigate cognitive processes underlying cognitive test performance. We give an overview of modeling approaches and of findings obtained with these approaches. Four types of models are discussed: response time models (RT as the sole dependent variable), joint models (RT together with other variables as dependent variable), local dependency models (with remaining dependencies between RT and accuracy), and response time as covariate models (RT as independent variable). The evidence from these approaches is often not very informative about the specific kind of processes (other than problem solving, information accumulation, and rapid guessing), but the findings do suggest dual processing: automated processing (e.g., knowledge retrieval) vs. controlled processing (e.g., sequential reasoning steps), and alternative explanations for the same results exist. While it seems well-possible to differentiate rapid guessing from normal problem solving (which can be based on automated or controlled processing), further decompositions of response times are rarely made, although possible based on some of model approaches.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 98 条
[21]   Evaluating Cognitive Theory: A Joint Modeling Approach Using Responses and Response Times [J].
Entink, Rinke H. Klein ;
Hornke, Lutz F. ;
Kuhn, Joerg-Tobias ;
Fox, Jean-Paul .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2009, 14 (01) :54-75
[22]   LINEAR LOGISTIC TEST MODEL AS AN INSTRUMENT IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH [J].
FISCHER, GH .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1973, 37 (06) :359-374
[23]   Joint Modeling of Ability and Differential Speed Using Responses and Response Times [J].
Fox, Jean-Paul ;
Marianti, Sukaesi .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2016, 51 (04) :540-553
[24]   Modelling individual response time effects between and within experimental speed conditions: A GLMM approach for speeded tests [J].
Goldhammer, Frank ;
Steinwascher, Merle A. ;
Kroehne, Ulf ;
Naumann, Johannes .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 70 (02) :238-256
[25]   The Time on Task Effect in Reading and Problem Solving Is Moderated by Task Difficulty and Skill: Insights From a Computer-Based Large-Scale Assessment [J].
Goldhammer, Frank ;
Naumann, Johannes ;
Stelter, Annette ;
Toth, Krisztina ;
Roelke, Heiko ;
Klieme, Eckhard .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 106 (03) :608-626
[26]   Controlling Individuals' Time Spent on Task in Speeded Performance Measures Experimental Time Limits, Posterior Time Limits, and Response Time Modeling [J].
Goldhammer, Frank ;
Kroehne, Ulf .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2014, 38 (04) :255-267
[27]  
Goldhammer Frank., 2015, Journal of Intelligence, V3, P21, DOI [10.3390/jintelligence3010021, DOI 10.3390/JINTELLIGENCE3010021]
[28]  
Hayes A.F., 2017, Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach
[29]   The speed-accuracy tradeoff: methodology, and behavior [J].
Heitz, Richard P. .
FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 8
[30]   An analysis of an item-response strategy based on knowledge retrieval [J].
Jeon, Minjeong ;
De Boeck, Paul .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2019, 51 (02) :697-719