An Overview of Models for Response Times and Processes in Cognitive Tests

被引:125
作者
De Boeck, Paul [1 ,2 ]
Jeon, Minjeong [3 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Psychol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Grad Sch Educ & Informat Studies, Los Angeles, CA USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2019年 / 10卷
关键词
response time; response accuracy; cognitive tests; cognitive processes; psychometric models; local dependencies; automated and controlled processes; NUMERICAL REASONING SPEED; DIFFUSION DECISION-MODEL; CONDITIONAL-INDEPENDENCE; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; SLOW INTELLIGENCE; ITEM RESPONSES; ACCURACY; DEPENDENCE; TASK; COMPONENTS;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00102
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Response times (RTs) are a natural kind of data to investigate cognitive processes underlying cognitive test performance. We give an overview of modeling approaches and of findings obtained with these approaches. Four types of models are discussed: response time models (RT as the sole dependent variable), joint models (RT together with other variables as dependent variable), local dependency models (with remaining dependencies between RT and accuracy), and response time as covariate models (RT as independent variable). The evidence from these approaches is often not very informative about the specific kind of processes (other than problem solving, information accumulation, and rapid guessing), but the findings do suggest dual processing: automated processing (e.g., knowledge retrieval) vs. controlled processing (e.g., sequential reasoning steps), and alternative explanations for the same results exist. While it seems well-possible to differentiate rapid guessing from normal problem solving (which can be based on automated or controlled processing), further decompositions of response times are rarely made, although possible based on some of model approaches.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 98 条
  • [1] The Shifted Wald Distribution for Response Time Data Analysis
    Anders, Royce
    Alario, F. -Xavier
    Van Maanen, Leendert
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2016, 21 (03) : 309 - 327
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1997, Handbook of modern item response theory
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, J. Intell, DOI DOI 10.3390/JINTELLIGENCE4040014
  • [4] Modeling Nonlinear Conditional Dependence Between Response Time and Accuracy
    Bolsinova, Maria
    Molenaar, Dylan
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [5] Modelling Conditional Dependence Between Response Time and Accuracy
    Bolsinova, Maria
    de Boeck, Paul
    Tijmstra, Jesper
    [J]. PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2017, 82 (04) : 1126 - 1148
  • [6] Response moderation models for conditional dependence between response time and response accuracy
    Bolsinova, Maria
    Tijmstra, Jesper
    Molenaar, Dylan
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 70 (02) : 257 - 279
  • [7] Conditional Dependence between Response Time and Accuracy: An Overview of its Possible Sources and Directions for Distinguishing between Them
    Bolsinova, Maria
    Tijmstra, Jesper
    Molenaar, Dylan
    De Boeck, Paul
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [8] A test for conditional independence between response time and accuracy
    Bolsinova, Maria
    Maris, Gunter
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 69 (01) : 62 - 79
  • [9] EVIDENCE FROM AUDITORY SIMPLE REACTION-TIMES FOR BOTH CHANGE AND LEVEL DETECTORS
    BURBECK, SL
    [J]. PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1982, 32 (02): : 117 - 133
  • [10] Curvilinear dependency of response accuracy on response time in cognitive tests
    Chen, Haiqin
    De Boeck, Paul
    Grady, Matthew
    Yang, Chien-Lin
    Waldschmidt, David
    [J]. INTELLIGENCE, 2018, 69 : 16 - 23