Comparative analysis of three simulation models applied on a motored internal combustion engine

被引:19
作者
Pariotis, E. G. [1 ]
Kosmadakis, G. M. [2 ]
Rakopoulos, C. D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Hellen Naval Acad, Dept Naval Sci, Sect Naval Architecture & Marine Engn, Lab Naval Prop Syst, Hatzikyriakio 18539, Piraeus, Greece
[2] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Sch Mech Engn, Dept Thermal Engn, Internal Combust Engines Lab, Athens 15780, Greece
关键词
Computational fluid dynamics; Internal combustion engine; Quasi-dimensional; Single-zone; Motoring; DIESEL FUEL; CFD CODE; EMISSIONS; PERFORMANCE; HYDROGEN; BLENDS; FLOW;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2011.11.031
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The motivation of the present work is to comparatively evaluate the computational time and the results obtained using three computational models of increasing complexity, for the simulation of the closed part of the cycle of an internal combustion engine with a bowl-in-piston design, running under motoring conditions in the range of 1200-3000 rpm. The first model is a single-zone thermodynamic model, the second one is a hybrid quasi-dimensional model, and the third one is a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model. From the analysis conducted it is concluded that the single-zone model calculates with reasonable accuracy the in-cylinder pressure, while it rather underestimates the peak in-cylinder mean gas temperature near the top dead center (TDC). Its main advantageous feature is the very low computational time (1 s) compared to the 6 min and 20 h required by the quasi-dimensional and CFD models, respectively. On the other hand, the quasi-dimensional model provides information concerning the local in-cylinder temperature distribution, and describes qualitatively correctly the way the cylinder design affects the in-cylinder flow and temperature fields, as revealed by comparing its results with the corresponding ones obtained with the more accurate and time consuming CFD model. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 55
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Annand W., 1963, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, V177, P973, DOI [10.1243/PIME_PROC_1963_177_069_02, DOI 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1963_177_069_02]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1980, 800287 SAE
[3]  
Bernard G, 2011, 2001010847 SAE
[4]   A CALCULATION PROCEDURE FOR TURBULENT-FLOW IN COMPLEX GEOMETRIES [J].
DEMIRDZIC, I ;
GOSMAN, AD ;
ISSA, RI ;
PERIC, M .
COMPUTERS & FLUIDS, 1987, 15 (03) :251-273
[5]   On the applicability of empirical heat transfer models for hydrogen combustion engines [J].
Demuynck, J. ;
De Paepe, M. ;
Huisseune, H. ;
Sierens, R. ;
Vancoillie, J. ;
Verhelst, S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2011, 36 (01) :975-984
[6]  
Ferziger J.H., 2002, Computational methods for fluid dynamics, Vthird
[7]   Thermal modelling of modern engines: a review of empirical correlations to estimate the in-cylinder heat transfer coefficient [J].
Finol, C. A. ;
Robinson, K. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART D-JOURNAL OF AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING, 2006, 220 (D12) :1765-1781
[8]   Optimization of a HSDI Diesel Engine for Passenger Cars Using a Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm and Multi-Dimensional Modeling [J].
Ge, Hai-Wen ;
Shi, Yu ;
Reitz, Rolf D. ;
Wickman, David D. ;
Willems, Werner .
SAE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINES, 2009, 2 (01) :691-713
[9]   Turbulence modeling of internal combustion engines using RNG k-epsilon models [J].
Han, Z ;
Reitz, RD .
COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 106 (4-6) :267-295
[10]  
Hountalas D.T., 2001, SAE 2001 WORLD C, V3