Coevolution of costly mate choice and condition-dependent display of good genes

被引:174
作者
Houle, D
Kondrashov, AS
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[2] NIH, Natl Ctr Biotechnol Informat, Bethesda, MD 20894 USA
关键词
good gene; mate choice; sexual selection; deleterious mutation; condition dependence;
D O I
10.1098/rspb.2001.1823
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Females often choose their mates, instead of mating at random, even when a father contributes nothing but genes to his offspring. Costly female preferences for males with exaggerated traits that reduce viability, such as die peacock's tail, are particularly puzzling. Such preferences can evolve if directly favoured by natural selection or when the exaggerated trait, although maladaptive per se, indicates high overall quality of the male's genotype. Two recent analyses suggested that the advantage to mate choice based on genetic quality is too weak to explain extreme cases of exaggeration of display traits and the corresponding preferences. We studied coevolution of a female mate-preference function and a genotype-dependent male display function where mutation supplies variation in genotype quality and mate preference is costly. Preference readily evolves, often causing extreme exaggeration of the display. Mate choice and trait expression can approach an equilibrium, or a limit cycle, or exaggeration can proceed forever, eventually causing extinction.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 104
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Sexual selection and the maintenance of sexual reproduction
    Agrawal, AF
    [J]. NATURE, 2001, 411 (6838) : 692 - 695
  • [2] PATTERNS OF VARIATION IN TAIL ORNAMENT SIZE IN BIRDS
    ALATALO, RV
    HOGLUND, J
    LUNDBERG, A
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 1988, 34 (04) : 363 - 374
  • [3] ANDERSSON M, 1986, EVOLUTION, V40, P804, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb00540.x
  • [4] Andersson Malte, 1994
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1938, EVOLUTION
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1987, Sexual selection: testing the alternatives
  • [7] Borgia G., 1979, SEXUAL SELECTION REP, P19, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-108750-0.50008
  • [8] Bradbury J., 1987, Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives, P21
  • [9] BURT A, 1995, EVOLUTION, V49, P1, DOI [10.2307/2410288, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb05954.x]
  • [10] Geodakyan V.A., 1965, Probl. Peredachi Inf, V1, P105