The techno-economic analysis of a hybrid zero-emission building system integrated with a commercial-scale zero-emission hydrogen vehicle

被引:34
作者
Cao, Sunliang [1 ]
Alanne, Kari [2 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Fac Construct & Environm, Dept Bldg Serv Engn, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Aalto Univ, Sch Engn, Dept Mech Engn, POB 14400, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland
关键词
Zero emission building; Zero emission vehicle; Zero energy building; On-site renewable energy; Hydrogen vehicle; Building and transportation; ELECTRIC VEHICLES; ENERGY MANAGEMENT; MODEL; FLEXIBILITY; PERFORMANCE; CONSUMPTION; STORAGE; IMPACT; H-2;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.11.079
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This study conducts a techno-economic analysis to seek the feasibility to integrate a zero-emission building (ZEB) with a commercial-scale hydrogen vehicle (HV). The parametric analysis is conducted in 16 simulation groups with respect to the equipment options of the solar thermal collectors, the ground source heat pump (GSHP) and the HV refueling methods, while each group contains a series of cases with a range of on-site renewable electricity (REe) generation capacities between 0 and 16 kW. The assessment criteria include the annual operational equivalent CO2 emission and the relative net present value (NPVrel). By the parametric analysis, the sets of the non-dominated cases within the cloud of the analysed solutions have been comprehensively investigated regarding the aims to reduce the emission and the cost. With respect to the criteria of the equivalent emission and NPVrel under the normal market scenario of the electrolyzer (5000 EUR/kW), none of the cases with the on-site H-2 system can be identified as superior to those without the on-site H-2 system. The non-dominated cases will mainly happen to those with a 0-9.61 NOCT kW photovoltaic (PV) panel and a 5 kW GSHP but without any solar thermal collector, which have a range of NPVrel between -4115 and 12,556 EUR along with a range of emission between 19.72 and 6.65 kg CO2,eq/m(2) a. However, by reducing the electrolyzer cost to the lowest market scenario of 2000 EUR/kW, parts of the cases with the on-site H-2 system start to challenge those without the on-site H-2 system. Moreover, the change of the emission factor of the H-2 fuel from 0.267 to 0.141 kg CO2,eq/kWh(LHV) will not alter the set of the overall non-dominated cases, but will uniformly reduce the annual emission of these cases by a magnitude of 3.83 kg CO2,eq/m(2) a.
引用
收藏
页码:639 / 661
页数:23
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Getting to net zero energy building: Investigating the role of vehicle to home technology [J].
Alirezaei, Mehdi ;
Noori, Mehdi ;
Tatari, Omer .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2016, 130 :465-476
[2]  
American Honda Motor Co. Inc, 2017, 2017 CLAR FUEL CELL
[3]  
[Anonymous], TESSLIBS 17 COMP LIB
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, APPL ENERGY
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, DOENETL20061227
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, 700 BAR HYDR COMPR
[7]   Extended utilization of electric vehicles and their re-used batteries to support the building energy management system [J].
Aziz, Muhammad ;
Oda, Takuya ;
Kashiwagi, Takao .
CLEAN, EFFICIENT AND AFFORDABLE ENERGY FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE, 2015, 75 :1938-1943
[8]  
Biebuyck B., 2016, C HYDR 2 0 ANTW 25 O
[9]   Approaches to enhance the energy performance of a zero-energy building integrated with a commercial-scale hydrogen fueled zero-energy vehicle under Finnish and German conditions [J].
Cao, Sunliang ;
Klein, Konstantin ;
Herkel, Sebastian ;
Siren, Kai .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 142 :153-175
[10]   Comparison of the energy and environmental impact by integrating a H2 vehicle and an electric vehicle into a zero-energy building [J].
Cao, Sunliang .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 123 :153-173