The Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic TOPSIS Method Based on Novel Information Measures

被引:18
作者
Tan, Qian-Yun [1 ]
Wei, Cui-Ping [2 ]
Liu, Qi [1 ]
Feng, Xiang-Qian [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Normal Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Technol, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Yangzhou Univ, Coll Math Sci, Yangzhou 225002, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Multi-criteria decision making; hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets; hesitance degree; ordered weighted distance measure; TOPSIS; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; WEIGHTED DISTANCE MEASURE; TERM SETS; AGGREGATION OPERATORS; PREFERENCE RELATIONS; OUTRANKING APPROACH; SIMILARITY MEASURES; ENVIRONMENT; CONSISTENCY;
D O I
10.1142/S0217595916500354
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets (HFLTSs) have attracted lots of attention recently due to their distinguished power and efficiency for dealing with multi-criteria decision making. To extend the applicability of HFLTSs, this paper first presents a more concise comparison formula of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets based on probability criterion of uniform distribution and develops novel distance measures considering the hesitance degree. Next, an aggregation scheme is designed to integrate OWD measure into the TOPSIS analysis procedure, in which we calculate different criterion weights according to the distance between criterion values and positive and negative ideal solutions. The weighted distances between the alternatives and positive and negative ideal solutions are calculated. Then the relative closeness degree to the positive ideal solution is calculated to rank all alternatives. Finally, an example is given to illustrate the capabilities and validation of the proposed algorithm.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1981, LECT NOTES EC MATH S
[2]   Aggregation functions for typical hesitant fuzzy elements and the action of automorphisms [J].
Bedregal, Benjamin ;
Reiser, Renata ;
Bustince, Humberto ;
Lopez-Molina, Carlos ;
Torra, Vicenc .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2014, 255 :82-99
[3]   TOPSIS for Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets [J].
Beg, Ismat ;
Rashid, Tabasam .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2013, 28 (12) :1162-1171
[4]  
Bellman R. E., 1971, Decision-making in a fuzzy environment, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.17.4.B141
[5]   Linguistic-labels aggregation and consensus measure for autocratic decision making using group recommendations [J].
Ben-Arieh, David ;
Chen, Zhifeng .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 2006, 36 (03) :558-568
[6]   HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS - THE PROMETHEE METHOD [J].
BRANS, JP ;
VINCKE, P ;
MARESCHAL, B .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1986, 24 (02) :228-238
[7]   A PREFERENCE RANKING ORGANIZATION METHOD - (THE PROMETHEE METHOD FOR MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING) [J].
BRANS, JP ;
VINCKE, PH .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1985, 31 (06) :647-656
[8]   Hesitant fuzzy ELECTRE II approach: A new way to handle multi-criteria decision making problems [J].
Chen, Na ;
Xu, Zeshui .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2015, 292 :175-197
[9]   The interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method and experimental analysis [J].
Chen, Ting-Yu ;
Tsao, Chueh-Yung .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2008, 159 (11) :1410-1428
[10]   A fuzzy linguistic methodology to deal with unbalanced linguistic term sets [J].
Herrera, Francisco ;
Herrera-Viedma, Enrique ;
Martinez, Luis .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2008, 16 (02) :354-370