Representation of Model Error in Convective-Scale Data Assimilation: Additive Noise Based on Model Truncation Error

被引:15
作者
Zeng, Yuefei [1 ,2 ]
Janjic, Tijana [2 ]
Sommer, Matthias [1 ,2 ]
de Lozar, Alberto [3 ]
Blahak, Ulrich [3 ]
Seifert, Axel [3 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Meteorol Inst, Munich, Germany
[2] Deutsch Wetterdienst, Hans Ertel Ctr Weather Res, Offenbach, Germany
[3] Deutsch Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany
来源
JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS | 2019年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
additive noise; model truncation error; multiscale; radar data assimilation; probabilistic forecasts; ENSEMBLE KALMAN FILTER; BOUNDARY-LAYER; RESOLUTION; RADAR; PREDICTION; INFLATION; VARIABILITY; FORECASTS;
D O I
10.1029/2018MS001546
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
To account for model error on multiple scales in convective-scale data assimilation, we incorporate the small-scale additive noise based on random samples of model truncation error and combine it with the large-scale additive noise based on random samples from global climatological atmospheric background error covariance. A series of experiments have been executed in the framework of the operational Kilometre-scale ENsemble Data Assimilation system of the Deutscher Wetterdienst for a 2-week period with different types of synoptic forcing of convection (i.e., strong or weak forcing). It is shown that the combination of large-and small-scale additive noise is better than the application of large-scale noise only. The specific increase in the background ensemble spread during data assimilation enhances the quality of short-term 6-hr precipitation forecasts. The improvement is especially significant during the weak forcing period, since the small-scale additive noise increases the small-scale variability which may favor occurrence of convection. It is also shown that additional perturbation of vertical velocity can further advance the performance of combination.
引用
收藏
页码:752 / 770
页数:19
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Monographs on statistics and applied probability
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, DWD OFFENBACH
[3]   Operational Convective-Scale Numerical Weather Prediction with the COSMO Model: Description and Sensitivities [J].
Baldauf, Michael ;
Seifert, Axel ;
Foerstner, Jochen ;
Majewski, Detlev ;
Raschendorfer, Matthias ;
Reinhardt, Thorsten .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2011, 139 (12) :3887-3905
[4]   The use of moisture flux convergence in forecasting convective initiation: Historical and operational perspectives [J].
Banacos, PC ;
Schultz, DM .
WEATHER AND FORECASTING, 2005, 20 (03) :351-366
[5]   A comparison of the ECMWF, MSC, and NCEP global ensemble prediction systems [J].
Buizza, R ;
Houtekamer, PL ;
Toth, Z ;
Pellerin, G ;
Wei, MZ ;
Zhu, YJ .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2005, 133 (05) :1076-1097
[6]   Heavy rainfall episodes over Liguria in autumn 2011: numerical forecasting experiments [J].
Buzzi, A. ;
Davolio, S. ;
Malguzzi, P. ;
Drofa, O. ;
Mastrangelo, D. .
NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2014, 14 (05) :1325-1340
[7]   A comparison between the 4DVAR and the ensemble Kalman filter techniques for radar data assimilation [J].
Caya, A ;
Sun, J ;
Snyder, C .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2005, 133 (11) :3081-3094
[8]  
Doms G., 2011, A Description of the Nonhydrostatic Regional COSMO MODEL. Part II: Physical Parameterization
[9]  
Dowell D. C., 2004, 22 C SEV LOC STROMS, V12, P1
[10]   Additive Noise for Storm-Scale Ensemble Data Assimilation [J].
Dowell, David C. ;
Wicker, Louis J. .
JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 26 (05) :911-927