The Influence of Disgust on Technology Acceptance

被引:0
作者
Ernst, Claus-Peter H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Frankfurt Univ Appl Sci, Frankfurt, Germany
来源
AMCIS 2017 PROCEEDINGS | 2017年
关键词
Perceived Disgust; Technology Acceptance; USER ACCEPTANCE; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; SENSITIVITY; SCALE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Technology usage can hold different kinds of disgust elicitors. In this paper, it is postulated that Perceived Disgust, which is described here as the extent to which a person feels disgusted by the prospective usage of a technology, has a direct negative influence on the Behavioral Intention to Use a technology as well as an indirect influence on the Behavioral Intention to Use a technology through Perceived Usefulness. After collecting 136 online questionnaires and applying a structural equation modeling approach, these hypotheses were confirmed. These findings suggest that technology manufacturers should address people's potential negative perceptions of their devices in terms of the different domains of disgust, for example, by using antibacterial coatings, corresponding advertisements, and collaborating with respected medical experts.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[2]  
Alarcon del-AmoM., 2012, African Journal of Business Management, V6, P8609
[3]   Disgust and related aversions [J].
Angyal, A .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1941, 36 :393-412
[4]  
Beaudry A, 2010, MIS QUART, V34, P689
[5]  
Brief A.P., 1977, Academy of Management review, V2, P496, DOI DOI 10.2307/257706
[6]  
Cenfetelli R. T., 2004, AC MAN P 2004
[7]   USER ACCEPTANCE OF COMPUTER-TECHNOLOGY - A COMPARISON OF 2 THEORETICAL-MODELS [J].
DAVIS, FD ;
BAGOZZI, RP ;
WARSHAW, PR .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1989, 35 (08) :982-1003
[9]   EXTRINSIC AND INTRINSIC MOTIVATION TO USE COMPUTERS IN THE WORKPLACE [J].
DAVIS, FD ;
BAGOZZI, RP ;
WARSHAW, PR .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 22 (14) :1111-1132
[10]   AN ARGUMENT FOR BASIC EMOTIONS [J].
EKMAN, P .
COGNITION & EMOTION, 1992, 6 (3-4) :169-200