Evaluating the effectiveness of conservation site networks under climate change: accounting for uncertainty

被引:72
作者
Bagchi, Robert [1 ]
Crosby, Mike [2 ]
Huntley, Brian [1 ]
Hole, David G. [3 ]
Butchart, Stuart H. M. [2 ]
Collingham, Yvonne [1 ]
Kalra, Mohit [4 ]
Rajkumar, Jagadish [4 ]
Rahmani, Asad [4 ]
Pandey, Mitra [5 ]
Gurung, Hum [5 ]
Le Trong Trai [6 ]
Nguyen Van Quang [6 ]
Willis, Stephen G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Durham, Sch Biol & Biomed Sci, Durham DH1 3LE, England
[2] BirdLife Int, Wellbrook Court, Cambridge CB3 0NA, England
[3] Conservat Int, Sci & Knowledge Div, Arlington, VA 22202 USA
[4] Bombay Nat Hist Soc, Bombay 400023, Maharashtra, India
[5] Bird Conservat Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal
[6] BirdLife Int Indochina, Hanoi, Vietnam
关键词
bird diversity; Eastern Himalaya; environmental change; Important Bird Area; Mekong; protected area; site management adaptation; spatial autocorrelation; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELS; PROTECTED AREAS; SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATION; GLOBAL BIODIVERSITY; PROJECTED IMPACTS; RESERVE NETWORKS; RANDOM FORESTS; DISTRIBUTIONS; RANGE; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1111/gcb.12123
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
We forecasted potential impacts of climate change on the ability of a network of key sites for bird conservation (Important Bird Areas; IBAs) to provide suitable climate for 370 bird species of current conservation concern in two Asian biodiversity hotspots: the Eastern Himalaya and Lower Mekong. Comparable studies have largely not accounted for uncertainty, which may lead to inappropriate conclusions. We quantified the contribution of four sources of variation (choice of general circulation models, emission scenarios and species distribution modelling methods and variation in species distribution data) to uncertainty in forecasts and tested if our projections were robust to these uncertainties. Declines in the availability of suitable climate within the IBA network by 2100 were forecast as extremely likely' for 45% of species, whereas increases were projected for only 2%. Thus, we predict almost 24 times as many losers' as winners'. However, for no species was suitable climate extremely likely' to be completely lost from the network. Considerable turnover (median=43%, 95% CI=3569%) in species compositions of most IBAs were projected by 2100. Climatic conditions in 47% of IBAs were projected as extremely likely' to become suitable for fewer priority species. However, no IBA was forecast to become suitable for more species. Variation among General Circulation Models and Species Distribution Models contributed most to uncertainty among forecasts. This uncertainty precluded firm conclusions for 53% of species and IBAs because 95% confidence intervals included projections of no change. Considering this uncertainty, however, allows robust recommendations concerning the remaining species and IBAs. Overall, while the IBA network will continue to sustain bird conservation, climate change will modify which species each site will be suitable for. Thus, adaptive management of the network, including modified site conservation strategies and facilitating species' movement among sites, is critical to ensure effective future conservation.
引用
收藏
页码:1236 / 1248
页数:13
相关论文
共 82 条
[31]   Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data:: a review [J].
Dormann, Carsten F. ;
McPherson, Jana M. ;
Araujo, Miguel B. ;
Bivand, Roger ;
Bolliger, Janine ;
Carl, Gudrun ;
Davies, Richard G. ;
Hirzel, Alexandre ;
Jetz, Walter ;
Kissling, W. Daniel ;
Kuehn, Ingolf ;
Ohlemueller, Ralf ;
Peres-Neto, Pedro R. ;
Reineking, Bjoern ;
Schroeder, Boris ;
Schurr, Frank M. ;
Wilson, Robert .
ECOGRAPHY, 2007, 30 (05) :609-628
[32]   Promising the future? Global change projections of species distributions [J].
Dormann, Carsten F. .
BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2007, 8 (05) :387-397
[33]   Effects of incorporating spatial autocorrelation into the analysis of species distribution data [J].
Dormann, Carsten F. .
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2007, 16 (02) :129-138
[34]   COMPONENTS OF UNCERTAINTY IN SPECIES DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS: A CASE STUDY OF THE GREAT GREY SHRIKE [J].
Dormann, Carsten F. ;
Purschke, Oliver ;
Marquez, Jaime R. Garcia ;
Lautenbach, Sven ;
Schroeder, Boris .
ECOLOGY, 2008, 89 (12) :3371-3386
[35]   A working guide to boosted regression trees [J].
Elith, J. ;
Leathwick, J. R. ;
Hastie, T. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2008, 77 (04) :802-813
[36]   Mapping epistemic uncertainties and vague concepts in predictions of species distribution [J].
Elith, J ;
Burgman, MA ;
Regan, HM .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2002, 157 (2-3) :313-329
[37]   Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data [J].
Elith, J ;
Graham, CH ;
Anderson, RP ;
Dudík, M ;
Ferrier, S ;
Guisan, A ;
Hijmans, RJ ;
Huettmann, F ;
Leathwick, JR ;
Lehmann, A ;
Li, J ;
Lohmann, LG ;
Loiselle, BA ;
Manion, G ;
Moritz, C ;
Nakamura, M ;
Nakazawa, Y ;
Overton, JM ;
Peterson, AT ;
Phillips, SJ ;
Richardson, K ;
Scachetti-Pereira, R ;
Schapire, RE ;
Soberón, J ;
Williams, S ;
Wisz, MS ;
Zimmermann, NE .
ECOGRAPHY, 2006, 29 (02) :129-151
[38]   Species Distribution Models: Ecological Explanation and Prediction Across Space and Time [J].
Elith, Jane ;
Leathwick, John R. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY EVOLUTION AND SYSTEMATICS, 2009, 40 :677-697
[39]   Do they? How do they? WHY do they differ? On finding reasons for differing performances of species distribution models [J].
Elith, Jane ;
Graham, Catherine H. .
ECOGRAPHY, 2009, 32 (01) :66-77
[40]   The projection of species distribution models and the problem of non-analog climate [J].
Fitzpatrick, Matthew C. ;
Hargrove, William W. .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2009, 18 (08) :2255-2261