A comparative study between the efficacy of bupivacaine plus nalbuphine versus bupivacaine alone in pectoral nerve block for management of postoperative pain in patients undergoing breast fibroadenoma excision

被引:1
作者
Mohammed, Mostafa Salaheldeen [1 ]
Latif, Samia Abdelmohsen Abdel [1 ]
Nasr, Dalia Abdelhamid [1 ]
Serry, Mostafa Mohamed [1 ]
机构
[1] Ain Shams Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesiol Intens Care & Pain Management, Cairo 11591, Egypt
关键词
PECS I block; Nalbuphine; Fibroadenoma; Breast surgery; Pectoral nerve block; Regional anaesthesia; ANALGESIA;
D O I
10.1186/s42077-022-00240-3
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Breast surgeries, even the relatively minor ones, can be associated with significant postoperative pain affecting patients' physical and psychological well-being. As a result, regional anaesthetic approaches have been used for breast surgery anaesthesia and analgesia. PECS I and II blocks have been proven to be relatively easy and safe in such regards. Moreover, using adjuvants, such as nalbuphine, have been proposed by many studies to intensify the block and decrease postoperative analgesic intake. This current study aims to assess the effects of using nalbuphine (20 mg) as a bupivacaine 0.25% (10 ml) adjuvant in PECS I block compared to injecting bupivacaine 0.25% (10 ml) alone in fibroadenoma excision patients. This trial enrolled 60 patients, 30 of whom received bupivacaine plus nalbuphine (group BN) and 30 in the bupivacaine only (group B). Postoperative VAS, SpO(2) and vital signs at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 h as well as the amount of morphine consumed, the time it took for the first analgesic to be administered and adverse effects were both recorded and compared. Results: Regarding postoperative outcomes, a statistically significant difference between the two groups was not detected regarding VAS, SpO(2), vital signs and adverse effects. Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in total morphine intake in the 24h following surgery between the two groups (p-value= 0.65). Only 9 out of 60 patients needed analgesia, 5 in the BN group and 4 in the B group, and time to the first analgesic was not of statistically significant difference between BN and B groups (211.8 +/- 71.29 and 183.5 +/- 29.872 min respectively) (p-value= 0.73). In terms of postoperative complications, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Conclusions: Adding nalbuphine (20 mg) to bupivacaine in PECS I block in fibroadenoma patients undergoing excision is not accompanied by a difference with statistical significance in postoperative VAS, morphine consumption and duration to the first analgesia when compared to bupivacaine alone.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Nalbuphine as an adjuvant to 0.25% levobupivacaine in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block provided prolonged sensory block and similar motor block durations (RCT) [J].
Abdelhamid, Bassant Mohamed ;
Omar, Heba .
JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2018, 32 (04) :551-557
[2]  
Abdelhaq M.M., 2016, Open Journal of Anesthesiology, V6, P20
[3]   Pectoral Nerves I and II Blocks in Multimodal Analgesia for Breast Cancer Surgery A Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Bashandy, Ghada Mohammad Nabih ;
Abbas, Dina Nabil .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2015, 40 (01) :68-74
[4]   The 'pecs block': a novel technique for providing analgesia after breast surgery [J].
Blanco, R. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 66 (09) :847-848
[5]  
Bouzinac A, 2015, MINERVA ANESTESIOL, V81, P589
[6]  
Das Anjan, 2017, Anesth Essays Res, V11, P40, DOI 10.4103/0259-1162.200225
[7]  
Gartner R, 2012, PREVALENCE FACTORS A
[8]  
Gupta K., 2016, Indian J Pain, V30, P176, DOI DOI 10.4103/0970-5333.198024
[9]   Ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block vs pectoral nerve block for postoperative analgesia after modified radical mastectomy [J].
Hamed, Islam Gamal ;
Fawaz, Ahmed Ali ;
Rabie, Amal Hamed ;
Abd El Aziz, Abd El Aziz Abdallah ;
Ashoor, Tarek M. .
AIN SHAMS JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 12 (01)
[10]  
Ibrahim ES, 2018, Open J Anesthesiol, V8, P159