Prediction of extracapsular disease with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in high risk localized prostate cancer patients

被引:0
作者
Hernandez-Sanchez, J. E.
Castillo, E. [1 ,4 ]
Barbero, J. M. [2 ]
Lista, F. [3 ]
Gonzalez, Y. J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Getafe, Serv Radiol, Madrid, Spain
[2] Hosp Univ Getafe, Serv Anat Patol, Madrid, Spain
[3] Hosp Univ Getafe, Serv Urol, Madrid, Spain
[4] Univ Europea Madrid, Madrid, Spain
[5] Hosp Cent Cruz Roja San Jose & Santa Adela, Serv Urol, Madrid 28003, Spain
来源
ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA | 2013年 / 66卷 / 10期
关键词
Prostate cancer; High risk; Magnetic resonance imaging; Multiparametric analysis; Staging; Diagnosis; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; PATHOLOGICAL FINDINGS; GLEASON SCORE; SPATIAL-RESOLUTION; NEEDLE-BIOPSY; ANTIGEN; CARCINOMA; SPECIMENS; MRI; IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: To assess the usefulness of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the staging of patients with localized prostate cancer (PC) and high risk of extracapsular disease (ECD). METHODS: Retrospective study including 30 patients with localized PC and high risk of ECD. Pathologist and radiologist established an ECD suspicion according to the evaluation of the prostatic biopsy specimens and the multiparametric MRI analysis, respectively Radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen analysis was used as a definitive confirmatory reference. Kappa (k) test was used to assess the degree of consistency between the initial suspicion provided by both specialists and the reference RP specimen. RESULTS: When the prostatic gland was analyzed as a single unit, the pathological evaluation of the biopsy specimens did not correctly detect the risk of ECD in 46.6% of the patients (14/30; 10 FN; k=-0.035, 95%CI[-0.29-0.36]), while multiparametric MRI did not do in 36% of the cases (11/30, 9 FP; k=0.27, 95%Cl [-0.03-0.61]). Whereas, if each side of the prostate (i.e. right and left) was considered as an independent observation, the pathologist wrongly predicted the risk of ECD in 35% of the cases (21/60; 18 FN; k=0.19, 95%Cl [-0.03-0.40]), while the radiologist erred only in 18.3% of the cases (11/60; 7 FN and 4 FP; k=0, 61, 95%Cl [0.40-0.81]). CONCLUSIONS: Data from our experience suggest an added value of multiparametric MRI in the clinical staging of localized PC in cases of high risk of ECD. Multiparametric MRI may be used as a helpful tool in the surgical planning and the decision-making process regarding the management of this entity.
引用
收藏
页码:956 / 966
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Transition zone prostate cancers: Features, detection, localization, and staging at endorectal MR imaging [J].
Akin, Oguz ;
Sala, Evis ;
Moskowitz, Chaya S. ;
Kuroiwa, Kentaro ;
Ishill, Nicole M. ;
Pucar, Darko ;
Scardino, Peter T. ;
Hricak, Hedvig .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 239 (03) :784-792
[2]   Prediction of prostate cancer extracapsular extension with high spatial resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced 3-T MRI [J].
Bloch, B. Nicolas ;
Genega, Elizabeth M. ;
Costa, Daniel N. ;
Pedrosa, Ivan ;
Smith, Martin P. ;
Kressel, Herbert Y. ;
Ngo, Long ;
Sanda, Martin G. ;
DeWolf, William C. ;
Rofsky, Neil M. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (10) :2201-2210
[3]   Prostate cancer detection: Comparison of T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, and the three techniques combined [J].
Chen, M. ;
Dang, H. -D. ;
Wang, J. -Y. ;
Zhou, C. ;
Li, S. -Y. ;
Wang, W. -C. ;
Zhao, W. -F. ;
Yang, Z. -H. ;
Zhong, C. -Y. ;
Li, G. -Z. .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2008, 49 (05) :602-610
[4]   Correlation between Gleason score of needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen: Accuracy and clinical implications [J].
Cookson, MS ;
Fleshner, NE ;
Soloway, SM ;
Fair, WR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (02) :559-562
[5]   Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection, Localisation, and Characterisation of Prostate Cancer: Recommendations from a European Consensus Meeting [J].
Dickinson, Louise ;
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Allen, Clare ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Carey, Brendan ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. ;
Heijmink, Stijn W. ;
Hoskin, Peter J. ;
Kirkham, Alex ;
Padhani, Anwar R. ;
Persad, Raj ;
Puech, Philippe ;
Punwani, Shonit ;
Sohaib, Aslam S. ;
Tombal, Bertrand ;
Villers, Arnauld ;
van der Meulen, Jan ;
Emberton, Mark .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 59 (04) :477-494
[6]   Preoperative model for predicting prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy using percent of biopsy tissue with cancer, biopsy Gleason grade and serum prostate specific antigen [J].
Freedland, SJ ;
Terris, MK ;
Csathy, GS ;
Kane, CJ ;
Amling, CL ;
Presti, JC ;
Dorey, F ;
Aronson, WJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (06) :2215-2220
[7]   Are prostate needle biopsies predictive of the laterality of significant cancer and positive surgical margins? [J].
Frota, Rodrigo ;
Stein, Robert J. ;
Turna, Burak ;
Kamoi, Kazumi ;
Lin, Yi-Chia ;
Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina ;
Aron, Monish ;
Gill, Inderbir S. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 104 (11) :1599-1603
[8]   Percent of cancer in the biopsy set predicts pathological findings after prostatectomy [J].
Grossklaus, DJ ;
Coffey, CS ;
Shappell, SB ;
Jack, GS ;
Chang, SS ;
Cookson, MS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (05) :2032-2036
[9]   Does the Extent of Carcinoma in Prostatic Biopsies Predict Prostate-Specific Antigen Recurrence? A Systematic Review [J].
Harnden, Patricia ;
Shelley, Michael D. ;
Naylor, Brian ;
Coles, Bernadette ;
Mason, Malcolm D. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 54 (04) :728-739
[10]   Salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: outcomes and prognostic factors especially focusing on pathological findings [J].
Hayashi, Satoko ;
Hayashi, Keiji ;
Yoshimura, Ryo-ichi ;
Masuda, Hitoshi ;
Kihara, Kazunori ;
Shibuya, Hitoshi .
JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2012, 53 (05) :727-734