Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus esophagectomy for early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with tumor invasion to different depths

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive alternative to esophagectomy for early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (EESCC). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ESD and esophagectomy in EESCC with different depth of invasion. The data of EESCC patients who received ESD or esophagectomy between Jan 2011 to Dec 2018 at our center were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and procedure-related variables were compared between ESD and esophagectomy patients. 222 EESCC patients underwent ESD, while 184 underwent esophagectomy. No significant differences were found between the two groups in OS (P=0.417), DSS (P=0.423), and RFS (P=0.726). Procedure duration, post-procedure hospital stay, and hospitalization cost were all lower in ESD patients. Oncologic outcomes were similar between the two groups in propensity score-matched analysis. The RO resection rate was comparable between ESD and esophagectomy groups in the T1a-M1/M2 and M3/SM1 EESCC subgroups; no significant differences were found in OS, DSS and RFS. In the SM2/SM3 EESCC subgroup, although the prognosis of the two treatment groups was similar, the RO resection rate was significantly lower in ESD patients than in esophagectomy patients. Thus, we concluded ESD could be a first-line treatment for T1a-M1/M2 and M3/SM1 EESCC as oncologic outcome is comparable to that achieved with esophagectomy with minimal invasion, lower cost and lower incidence of serious adverse events. However, in SM2/SM3 EESCC patients, esophagectomy may be preferable.