Relative yield decomposition: A method for understanding the behaviour of complex crop models

被引:10
作者
Talbot, Gregoire [1 ]
Roux, Sebastien [1 ]
Graves, Anil [2 ]
Dupraz, Christian [1 ]
Marrou, Helene [1 ]
机构
[1] INRA, UMR Syst, F-34060 Montpellier 1, France
[2] Cranfield Univ, Sch Appl Sci, Nat Resources Management Ctr, Cranfield MK43 0AL, Beds, England
关键词
Process-based model; Model behaviour; Virtual experiment; Crop yield; LAND EQUIVALENT RATIO; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; PARAMETER-SPARSE; SIMULATION; GROWTH; SYSTEMS; PRODUCTIVITY; MAIZE; TEMPERATURE; SAFE;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.09.017
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Dynamic crop simulation models are widely used to investigate, through virtual experiments, the response of crop yield to changes in climate, management or crop genetic traits. In a search for widespread applicability, crop models include a large number of processes, sometimes to the detriment of their mathematical transparency. Simulated crop yield responses to variation in model inputs result from the integration over a long period (one or several years) of many different crop processes interacting at the model time-step, typically the day. Thus, by definition, yield explanatory factors are intricate and difficult to link efficiently to the crop processes. Ranking their relative contributions to the final yield output is for example almost impossible. In this work, we introduce a new approach to understand the response of crop yield Y by comparing two simulation runs (computing two yields Y-1 and Y-2) of the same model and by focussing on the relative yield: y = Y-1/Y-2. Providing that the mathematical formulation of the dynamic crop model verifies simple hypotheses held by most crop models, we show that it is possible to factorise the relative yield y into several terms. These terms can be (i) interpreted as the specific effects of the modelled crop processes on the crop yield, (ii) compared to rank the effects of the crop processes on the crop yield. Their definition involves using state variables of the model computed during the simulation runs. The method does not involve running the model numerous times, neither changing its formulation. It may require to output new variables that are not in the set of variables proposed by the released version of the model. We call our method the relative yield decomposition (RYD) method. We illustrate how the RYD provides insight in the analysis of complex crop models by applying it to two models: Yield-SAFE (agroforestry model) and STICS (crop model). The method allows to identify and quantify the importance of the main processes responsible for crop yield variations for different simulation configurations in the two models. The relative yield decomposition method is complementary to other model analysis methods like sensitivity analysis or multiple model simulations. We show that it could be applied to some widely used crop models (e.g. AQUACROP, CERES, CROPGRO, CROPSYST, EPIC, SIRIUS, SUCROS). The relative yield decomposition method appears as a powerful and generic tool to analyse the behaviour of complex crop models that can help to improve the formulation of the models, or even to study specific plant traits or crop processes when applied to a model accurate enough. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 148
页数:13
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Diagnosis of the productivity gap using a crop model. Methodology and case study of small-scale maize production in central Brazil
    Affholder, F
    Scopel, E
    Neto, JM
    Capillon, A
    [J]. AGRONOMIE, 2003, 23 (04): : 305 - 325
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1985, ARS WHEAT YIELD PROJ
  • [3] Simulated wheat growth affected by rising temperature, increased water deficit and elevated atmospheric CO2
    Asseng, S
    Jamieson, PD
    Kimball, B
    Pinter, P
    Sayre, K
    Bowden, JW
    Howden, SM
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2004, 85 (2-3) : 85 - 102
  • [4] A simulation analysis that predicts the influence of physiological traits on the potential yield of wheat
    Asseng, S
    Turner, NC
    Ray, JD
    Keating, BA
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2002, 17 (02) : 123 - 141
  • [5] Boote KJ, 1998, SYST APPR S, V7, P99
  • [6] The 'School of de Wit' crop growth simulation models: A pedigree and historical overview
    Bouman, BAM
    vanKeulen, H
    vanLaar, HH
    Rabbinge, R
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 1996, 52 (2-3) : 171 - 198
  • [7] Brisson N., 2006, WORKING DYNAMIC CROP, P257
  • [8] Brisson N., 2009, FORMALISATIONS PARAM
  • [9] Sensitivity analysis of a hierarchical qualitative model for sustainability assessment of cropping systems
    Carpani, Marta
    Bergez, Jacques-Eric
    Monod, Herve
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2012, 27-28 : 15 - 22
  • [10] Simulating the Yield Impacts of Organ-Level Quantitative Trait Loci Associated With Drought Response in Maize: A "Gene-to-Phenotype" Modeling Approach
    Chenu, Karine
    Chapman, Scott C.
    Tardieu, Francois
    McLean, Greg
    Welcker, Claude
    Hammer, Graeme L.
    [J]. GENETICS, 2009, 183 (04) : 1507 - 1523