Efficacy and safety of azelastine 0.15% nasal spray administered once daily in patients with allergy to Texas mountain cedar pollen

被引:15
作者
Howland, William C. [2 ]
Amar, Niran J. [3 ]
Wheeler, William [1 ]
Sacks, Harry
机构
[1] Meda Pharmaceut Inc, Med Commun, Somerset, NJ 08873 USA
[2] Allergy & Asthma Ctr Austin, Austin, TX USA
[3] Allergy & Asthma Res Inst, Waco, TX USA
关键词
allergic rhinitis; antihistamine; clinical trial; compliance; dosing; nasal congestion; runny nose; sneezing; tolerability; OCULAR SYMPTOMS; RHINITIS; RHINOCONJUNCTIVITIS; ANTIGEN; FUROATE; ASTHMA;
D O I
10.1002/alr.20065
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background: A previous study with azelastine nasal spray in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) demonstrated that increasing the azelastine concentration from 0.1% to 0.15% allowed for once-daily dosing without increasing the incidence of adverse effects. This study evaluated the efficacy of azelastine 0.15% nasal spray administered once daily for treating symptoms of SAR. Methods: In this 14-day, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, patients with moderate-to-severe SAR were randomized to azelastine 0.15% (n = 251) or placebo (n = 255), both at a dosage of 2 sprays/nostril once daily. The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline in the 12-hour reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS). Key secondary variables were change from baseline in 24-hour instantaneous TNSS, to establish the dosing interval, and change from baseline in the Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS). Results: The mean improvement (3.57) and percentage improvement (19.3%) in 12-hour reflective TNSS was significant (p < 0.012) with azelastine 0.15% compared to placebo (2.14 and 11.4%, respectively). The mean improvement in 24-hour instantaneous TNSS was also significant (p <= 0.001) for azelastine 0.15% compared to placebo, indicating efficacy with once-daily dosing. The overall improvement and percentage improvement in TOSS was significant (p = 0.012) with azelastine 0.15% (2.21 and 16.7%, respectively) compared to placebo (1.28 and 6.0%, respectively). The overall score for the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) was significantly (p < 0.001) improved from baseline in the azelastine group compared with the placebo group. Nasal discomfort (3.6%) and bitter taste (2.4%) were the most common adverse events. There were no reports of somnolence with azelastine. Conclusion: Azelastine 0.15% was effective and well tolerated with once-daily dosing. Azelastine 0.15% nasal spray significantly improved a complex of eye symptoms compared to placebo. (C) 2011 ARS-AAOA, LLC.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 279
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Ocular symptom reduction in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis treated with the intranasal. corticosteroid mometasone furoate [J].
Bielory, Leonard .
ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2008, 100 (03) :272-279
[2]   THE EFFECT OF AZELASTINE ON NEUTROPHIL AND EOSINOPHIL GENERATION OF SUPEROXIDE [J].
BUSSE, W ;
RANDLEV, B ;
SEDGWICK, J .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1989, 83 (02) :400-405
[3]   THE INTERACTION OF AZELASTINE WITH HUMAN-LUNG HISTAMINE-H1, BETA, AND MUSCARINIC RECEPTOR-BINDING SITES [J].
CASALE, TB .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1989, 83 (04) :771-776
[4]   Topical azelastine reduces eosinophil activation and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression on nasal epithelial cells: An antiallergic activity [J].
Ciprandi, G ;
Pronzato, C ;
Passalacqua, G ;
Ricca, V ;
Bagnasco, M ;
Grogen, J ;
Mela, GS ;
Canonica, GW .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1996, 98 (06) :1088-1096
[5]  
DeWester J, 2003, ALLERGY ASTHMA PROC, V24, P331
[6]  
DRUCE H, 1998, ALLERGIC NONALLERGIC
[7]   Diagnosis and Management of Rhinitis: Complete guidelines of the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters in Allergy, Asthma and Immunology [J].
Dykewicz, MS ;
Fineman, S ;
Skoner, DP ;
Nicklas, R ;
Lee, R ;
Blessing-Moore, J ;
Li, JT ;
Bernstein, IL ;
Berger, W ;
Spector, S ;
Schuller, D .
ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 1998, 81 (05) :478-518
[8]  
Fineman S., 2002, ATLAS ALLERGIC DIS
[9]  
Ito H, 1998, ARZNEIMITTELFORSCH, V48, P1143
[10]   Effectiveness of fluticasone furoate 110 μg once daily in the treatment of nasal and ocular symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis in adults and adolescents sensitized to mountain cedar pollen [J].
Jacobs, Robert ;
Martin, Bruce ;
Hampel, Frank ;
Toler, William ;
Ellsworth, Anna ;
Philpot, Edward .
CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2009, 25 (06) :1393-1401