The value of MRI contrast enhancement in biopsy decision of suspicious mammographic microcalcifications: a prospective multicenter study

被引:9
作者
Taskin, Fusun [1 ,2 ]
Kalayci, Cem Burak [3 ]
Tuncbilek, Nermin [4 ]
Soydemir, Efe [5 ]
Kurt, Nazmi [4 ]
Kaya, Handan [6 ]
Aribal, Erkin [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Acibadem MAA Univ, Atakent Univ Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, TR-34755 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Acibadem MAA Univ, Senol Res Inst, TR-34457 Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Acibadem MAA Univ, Atakent Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Vocat Sch Hlth Serv, TR-34303 Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Trakya Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, TR-22030 Edirne, Turkey
[5] Marmara Univ, Sch Med, Pendik Res Training Hosp, Dept Radiol, Muhsin Yazicioglu Cad 10, TR-34899 Istanbul, Turkey
[6] Marmara Univ, Pendik Res Training Hosp, Dept Pathol, Muhsin Yazicioglu Cad 10, TR-34899 Istanbul, Turkey
[7] Acibadem MAA Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, 32 Kayisdagi Cad, Istanbul, Turkey
[8] Acibadem Altunizade Hosp, Breast Ctr, Tophanelioglu Cad 13, TR-34662 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Breast cancer; Breast carcinoma in situ; Mammography; Magnetic resonance imaging; CARCINOMA IN-SITU; BREAST MRI; SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY; LESIONS; METAANALYSIS; MALIGNANCY; DIAGNOSIS; ACCURACY; UTILITY; BENIGN;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-020-07265-y
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives To investigate the inclusion of breast MRI in radiological assessment of suspicious, isolated microcalcifications detected with mammography. Methods In this prospective, multicenter study, cases with isolated microcalcifications in screening mammography were examined with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) before biopsy, and contrast enhancement of the relevant calcification localization was accepted as a positive finding on MRI. Six experienced breast radiologists evaluated the images and performed the biopsies. Imaging findings and histopathological results were recorded. Sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV of breast MRI were calculated and compared with histopathological findings. Results Suspicious microcalcifications, which were detected by screening mammograms of 444 women, were evaluated. Of these, 276 (62.2%) were diagnosed as benign and 168 (37.8%) as malignant. Contrast enhancement was present in microcalcification localization in 325 (73.2%) of the cases. DCE-MRI was positive in all 102 invasive carcinomas and in 58 (87.9%) of 66 DCIS cases. MRI resulted in false negatives in eight DCIS cases; one was high grade and the other seven were low-to-medium grade. The false-negative rate of DCE-MRI was 4.76%. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for DCE-MRI for mammography-detected suspicious microcalcifications were 95.2%, 40.2%, 49.2%, and 93.3%, respectively. Conclusions In this study, all invasive cancers and all DCIS except eight cases (12.1%) were detected with DCE-MRI. DCE-MRI can be used in the decision-making algorithm to decrease the number of biopsies in mammography-detected suspicious calcifications, with a tradeoff for overlooking a small number of DCIS cases that are of low-to-medium grade.
引用
收藏
页码:1718 / 1726
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Predictive values of BI-RADS® magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)
    Badan, Gustavo Machado
    Piato, Sebastiao
    Roveda Junior, Decio
    Castro Fleury, Eduardo de Faria
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (10) : 1701 - 1707
  • [2] Is breast MRI a helpful additional diagnostic test in suspicious mammographic microcalcifications?
    Baltzer, Pascal A. T.
    Bennani-Baiti, Barbara
    Stoettinger, Alexander
    Bumberger, Alexander
    Kapetas, Panagiotis
    Clauser, Paola
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2018, 46 : 70 - 74
  • [3] Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: Results of a multicenter trial
    Bazzocchi, M
    Zuiani, C
    Panizza, P
    Del Frate, C
    Soldano, F
    Isola, M
    Sardanelli, F
    Giuseppetti, GM
    Simonetti, G
    Lattanzio, V
    Del Maschio, A
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 186 (06) : 1723 - 1732
  • [4] MRI for the assessment of malignancy in BI-RADS 4 mammographic microcalcifications
    Bennani-Baiti, Barbara
    Dietzel, Matthias
    Baltzer, Pascal A.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (11):
  • [5] MR Imaging for Diagnosis of Malignancy in Mammographic Microcalcifications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bennani-Baiti, Barbara
    Baltzer, Pascal A.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2017, 283 (03) : 691 - 700
  • [6] Comparison of Digital Screening Mammography and Screen-Film Mammography in the Early Detection of Clinically Relevant Cancers: A Multicenter Study
    Bluekens, Adriana M. J.
    Holland, Roland
    Karssemeijer, Nico
    Broeders, Mireille J. M.
    den Heeten, Gerard J.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2012, 265 (03) : 707 - 714
  • [7] Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy
    Bluemke, DA
    Gatsonis, CA
    Chen, MH
    DeAngelis, GA
    DeBruhl, N
    Harms, S
    Heywang-Köbrunner, SH
    Hylton, N
    Kuhl, CK
    Lehman, C
    Pisano, ED
    Causer, P
    Schnitt, SJ
    Smazal, SF
    Stelling, CB
    Weatherall, PT
    Schnall, MD
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (22): : 2735 - 2742
  • [8] MRI and comparison mammography: a worthy diagnostic alliance for breast microcalcifications?
    Brnic, Dijana
    Brnic, Darko
    Simundic, Ivan
    Rogosic, Lucija Vanjaka
    Tadic, Tade
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2016, 57 (04) : 413 - 421
  • [9] Dorrius M D, 2010, Cancer Imaging, V10 Spec no A, pS54, DOI 10.1102/1470-7330.2010.9020
  • [10] Clinical Utility of Breast MRI in the Diagnosis of Malignancy After Inconclusive or Equivocal Mammographic Diagnostic Evaluation
    Giess, Catherine S.
    Chikarmane, Sona A.
    Sippo, Dorothy A.
    Birdwell, Robyn L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 208 (06) : 1378 - 1385