TOWARD INTEGRATION IN THE CONTEXT OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: THE NEED FOR EVALUATIVE FRAMEWORKS

被引:4
作者
van der Wilt, Gert Jan [1 ]
Gerhardus, Ansgar [2 ]
Oortwijn, Wija [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Bremen, Bremen, Germany
[3] Ecorys Netherlands, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Integration; Transparency; Evaluative frameworks; CAPABILITY APPROACH;
D O I
10.1017/S0266462317004354
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: A comprehensive health technology assessment (HTA) enables a patient-centered assessment of the effectiveness, economic, ethical, socio-cultural, and legal issues of health technologies that takes context and implementation into account. A question is whether these various pieces of evidence need to be integrated, and if so, how that might be achieved. The objective of our study is to discuss the meaning of integration in the context of HTA and suggest how it may be achieved in a more structured way. Methods: An analysis of the concept of integration in the context of HTA and a review of approaches that were adopted in the INTEGRATE-HTA project that may support integration. Results: Current approaches to integration in HTA are mainly methods of commensuration, which are not optimally geared to support public deliberation. In contrast, articulating evaluative frameworks could be an important means of integration which allows for exploring how facts and values can be brought to bear on each other. Conclusions: Integration is not something that only needs to be addressed at the end, but rather throughout an HTA, right from the start. Integration can be conceived as a matter of accounting for the relevance of empirical evidence in view of a commitment to a set of potentially conflicting values. Various elements of the INTEGRATE-HTA project, such as scoping and the development of logic models, can help to achieve integration in HTA.
引用
收藏
页码:586 / 590
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Capabilities and health [J].
Anand, P .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2005, 31 (05) :299-303
[2]  
[Anonymous], GUIDANCE USE LOGIC M
[3]  
Brereton, ASSESSING HLTH TECHN
[4]   Lay and professional stakeholder involvement in scoping palliative care issues: Methods used in seven European countries [J].
Brereton, Louise ;
Ingleton, Christine ;
Gardiner, Clare ;
Goyder, Elizabeth ;
Mozygemba, Kati ;
Lysdahl, Kristin Bakke ;
Tummers, Marcia ;
Sacchini, Dario ;
Leppert, Wojciech ;
Blazeviciene, Aurelija ;
van der Wilt, Gert Jan ;
Refolo, Pietro ;
De Nicola, Martina ;
Chilcott, James ;
Oortwijn, Wija .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 31 (02) :181-192
[5]   Hidden Treasures and Secret Pitfalls: Application of the Capability Approach to ParkinsonNet [J].
Canoy, Marcel ;
Faber, Marjan J. ;
Munneke, Marten ;
Oortwijn, Wija ;
Nijkrake, Maarten J. ;
Bloem, Bastiaan R. .
JOURNAL OF PARKINSONS DISEASE, 2015, 5 (03) :575-580
[6]   Welfarism, extra-welfarism and capability: The spread of ideas in health economics [J].
Coast, Joanna ;
Smith, Richard D. ;
Lorgelly, Paula .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2008, 67 (07) :1190-1198
[7]  
Guba Y., 1989, Fourth generation evaluation
[8]   Outcome Measurement in Economic Evaluations of Public Health Interventions: a Role for the Capability Approach? [J].
Lorgelly, Paula K. ;
Lawson, Kenny D. ;
Fenwick, Elisabeth A. L. ;
Briggs, Andrew H. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 7 (05) :2274-2289
[9]  
Lysdahl B, ASSESSING HLTH TECHN
[10]   A psychosocial follow-up study of deaf preschool children using cochlear implants [J].
Preisler, G ;
Tvingstedt, AL ;
Ahlström, M .
CHILD CARE HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2002, 28 (05) :403-418