Organizational Size and Social Capital in the Public Sector: Does Decentralization Matter?

被引:22
作者
Andrews, Rhys [1 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
关键词
organizational social capital; organization size; decentralized decision making; civil service; quantitative methods; PERFORMANCE; FIRM; CONSEQUENCES; PERSPECTIVE; ADVANTAGE; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1177/0734371X16643575
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Organization theory suggests that the strength of the ties between employees is likely to be weaker in large organizations, but that decentralization of decision making can help generate norms of collaboration, trust, and shared mission. This article explores the separate and combined effects of size and decentralization on perceptions of organizational social capital in central government agencies in Europe. The statistical results suggest that there is a negative relationship between organization size and organizational social capital and a contrasting positive relationship between decentralized decision making and social capital. Further analysis revealed that decentralization of key decisions can overcome the internal social dysfunctions associated with being a big organization. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 58
页数:19
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Adler P.S., 2002, ACAD MANAGE REV, V27, P17
[2]   Representation and Inclusion in Public Organizations: Evidence from the UK Civil Service [J].
Andrews, Rhys ;
Ashworth, Rachel .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2015, 75 (02) :279-288
[3]   Organizational social capital, structure and performance [J].
Andrews, Rhys .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 2010, 63 (05) :583-608
[4]   Size, Structure and Administrative Overheads: An Empirical Analysis of English Local Authorities [J].
Andrews, Rhys ;
Boyne, George A. .
URBAN STUDIES, 2009, 46 (04) :739-759
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1947, ADM BEHAV STUDY DECI
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, RES REPORT
[7]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402
[8]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120
[9]   Perceptions of strategic priorities, consensus and firm performance [J].
Bowman, C ;
Ambrosini, V .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 1997, 34 (02) :241-258
[10]   Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses [J].
Brambor, T ;
Clark, WR ;
Golder, M .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2006, 14 (01) :63-82