Readmission Rates After Decompression Surgery in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Among Medicare Beneficiaries

被引:52
作者
Modhia, Urvij [1 ]
Takemoto, Steven [1 ]
Braid-Forbes, Mary Jo [2 ]
Weber, Michael [1 ]
Berven, Sigurd H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Orthopaed Surg, San Francisco, CA USA
[2] Braid Forbes Hlth Res, Silver Spring, MD USA
关键词
readmission and reoperation rates; lumbar; spinal stenosis; spinal fusion; Medicare claims; LONG-TERM OUTCOMES; REOPERATION RATES; CLINICAL ARTICLE; OLDER-ADULTS; FUSION; COMPLICATIONS; LAMINECTOMY; MANAGEMENT; INJECTIONS; DISORDERS;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828628f5
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Retrospective observational cohort analysis of administrative claims. Objective. Estimate readmission rates after spine stenosis decompression surgery in a 5% randomly selected sample of Medicare beneficiaries. Summary of Background Data. Operative management of lumbar spinal stenosis has significant and measurable benefits compared with nonoperative care. Revision rates for lumbar decompression with and without fusion have been reported with significant variability. An understanding of readmission and reoperation rates informs decisions regarding the cost-effective management of lumbar stenosis. Methods. Patients were identified in 2005-2009 Medicare claims who had both a procedure code for decompression (03.09), and a diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis (724.02). Patients diagnosed with spondylolisthesis, and those receiving revision surgery or fusion of more than 3 segments were excluded. Kaplan-Meier product limit method was used to estimate univariate rates of readmission for fusion, decompression, or injection and Cox proportional hazards to examine whether fusion decreased the likelihood of readmission. Results. The overall 1-year readmission rate was slightly higher in patients undergoing fusion with decompression (9.7%) than patients who underwent decompression alone (7.2%, P = 0.03). Rates at 2 years were 14.6% and 12.5%, respectively. Patients receiving decompression with fusion were slightly younger and more likely female. Procedures performed during readmission were similar for the fusion and no fusion cohorts with 56% receiving fusion, 23% decompression, and 22% injection for pain management. Of the patients who were not readmitted, more than 25% of patients received outpatient injections for pain management during the 3-month quarter of their surgery and approximately 20% in the subsequent quarter. Conclusion. Readmission rates for spinal stenosis decompression were approximately 8% to 10% per year. Fusion at the index procedure did not protect against subsequent readmission. Large databases can inform choice of surgical options by focusing examination on indications for surgery and reasons for readmission. Fusion along with decompression does not seem to impact readmission rates.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 596
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reliability of facet fluid on preoperative MRI for prediction of segmental instability after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis
    Yoo, Seung-Chan
    Chough, Chung-Kee
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 68 (04) : 453 - 458
  • [22] Decompression and paraspinous tension band: a novel treatment method for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis
    Gibson, J. N. Alastair
    Depreitere, Bart
    Pflugmacher, Robert
    Schnake, Klaus J.
    Fielding, Louis C.
    Alamin, Todd F.
    Goffin, Jan
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 15 (03) : 23S - 32S
  • [23] Can decompression surgery relieve low back pain in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis combined with degenerative lumbar scoliosis?
    Tsutsui, Shunji
    Kagotani, Ryohei
    Yamada, Hiroshi
    Hashizume, Hiroshi
    Minamide, Akihito
    Nakagawa, Yukihiro
    Iwasaki, Hiroshi
    Yoshida, Munehito
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 22 (09) : 2010 - 2014
  • [24] Patient Characteristics Associated With Increased Postoperative Length of Stay and Readmission After Elective Laminectomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Basques, Bryce A.
    Varthi, Arya G.
    Golinvaux, Nicholas S.
    Bohl, Daniel D.
    Grauer, Jonathan N.
    SPINE, 2014, 39 (10) : 833 - 840
  • [25] Predictors of residual symptoms in lower extremities after decompression surgery on lumbar spinal stenosis
    Hara, Nobuhiro
    Oka, Hiroyuki
    Yamazaki, Takashi
    Takeshita, Katsushi
    Murakami, Motoaki
    Hoshi, Kazuto
    Terayama, Sei
    Seichi, Atsushi
    Nakamura, Kozo
    Kawaguchi, Hiroshi
    Matsudaira, Ko
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2010, 19 (11) : 1849 - 1854
  • [26] Technical Advances in Minimally Invasive Surgery Direct Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Lauryssen, Carl
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (26) : S287 - S293
  • [27] Extent of Decompression of Lumbar Spinal Canal after Endoscopic Surgery
    Dewanngan, Naresh Kumar
    Yadav, Yad Ram
    Parihar, Vijay Singh
    Ratre, Shailendra
    Kher, Yatin
    Bhatele, Pushpraj
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART A-CENTRAL EUROPEAN NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 78 (06) : 541 - 547
  • [28] Clinical Outcome in Lumbar Decompression Surgery for Spinal Canal Stenosis in the Aged Population
    Ulrich, Nils H.
    Kleinstueck, Frank
    Woernle, Christoph M.
    Antoniadis, Alexander
    Winklhofer, Sebastian
    Burgstaller, Jakob M.
    Farshad, Mazda
    Oberle, Joachim
    Porchet, Francois
    Min, Kan
    SPINE, 2015, 40 (06) : 415 - 422
  • [29] Quality of life changes after lumbar decompression in patients with tandem spinal stenosis
    Pennington, Zach
    Alentado, Vincent J.
    Lubelski, Daniel
    Alvin, Matthew D.
    Levin, Jay M.
    Benzel, Edward C.
    Mroz, Thomas E.
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 184
  • [30] Interspinous Spacers Compared With Decompression or Fusion for Lumbar Stenosis Complications and Repeat Operations in the Medicare Population
    Deyo, Richard A.
    Martin, Brook I.
    Ching, Alex
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Jarvik, Jeffrey G.
    Kreuter, William
    Mirza, Sohail K.
    SPINE, 2013, 38 (10) : 865 - 872