Readmission Rates After Decompression Surgery in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Among Medicare Beneficiaries

被引:52
|
作者
Modhia, Urvij [1 ]
Takemoto, Steven [1 ]
Braid-Forbes, Mary Jo [2 ]
Weber, Michael [1 ]
Berven, Sigurd H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Orthopaed Surg, San Francisco, CA USA
[2] Braid Forbes Hlth Res, Silver Spring, MD USA
关键词
readmission and reoperation rates; lumbar; spinal stenosis; spinal fusion; Medicare claims; LONG-TERM OUTCOMES; REOPERATION RATES; CLINICAL ARTICLE; OLDER-ADULTS; FUSION; COMPLICATIONS; LAMINECTOMY; MANAGEMENT; INJECTIONS; DISORDERS;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828628f5
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Retrospective observational cohort analysis of administrative claims. Objective. Estimate readmission rates after spine stenosis decompression surgery in a 5% randomly selected sample of Medicare beneficiaries. Summary of Background Data. Operative management of lumbar spinal stenosis has significant and measurable benefits compared with nonoperative care. Revision rates for lumbar decompression with and without fusion have been reported with significant variability. An understanding of readmission and reoperation rates informs decisions regarding the cost-effective management of lumbar stenosis. Methods. Patients were identified in 2005-2009 Medicare claims who had both a procedure code for decompression (03.09), and a diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis (724.02). Patients diagnosed with spondylolisthesis, and those receiving revision surgery or fusion of more than 3 segments were excluded. Kaplan-Meier product limit method was used to estimate univariate rates of readmission for fusion, decompression, or injection and Cox proportional hazards to examine whether fusion decreased the likelihood of readmission. Results. The overall 1-year readmission rate was slightly higher in patients undergoing fusion with decompression (9.7%) than patients who underwent decompression alone (7.2%, P = 0.03). Rates at 2 years were 14.6% and 12.5%, respectively. Patients receiving decompression with fusion were slightly younger and more likely female. Procedures performed during readmission were similar for the fusion and no fusion cohorts with 56% receiving fusion, 23% decompression, and 22% injection for pain management. Of the patients who were not readmitted, more than 25% of patients received outpatient injections for pain management during the 3-month quarter of their surgery and approximately 20% in the subsequent quarter. Conclusion. Readmission rates for spinal stenosis decompression were approximately 8% to 10% per year. Fusion at the index procedure did not protect against subsequent readmission. Large databases can inform choice of surgical options by focusing examination on indications for surgery and reasons for readmission. Fusion along with decompression does not seem to impact readmission rates.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 596
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Influence of decompression surgery on sagittal balance parameters in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis
    Silva, Pedro Santos
    Leocadio, Joana Sofia Neves
    Vaz, Rui
    Pereira, Paulo
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [22] LUMBAR SPINE SURGERY AND MORTALITY AMONG MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES, 1986
    OLDRIDGE, NB
    YUAN, Z
    STOLL, JE
    RIMM, AR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1994, 84 (08) : 1292 - 1298
  • [23] Endoscope-assisted spinal decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis
    Minamide, Akihito
    Yoshida, Munehito
    Yamada, Hiroshi
    Nakagawa, Yukihiro
    Kawai, Masaki
    Maio, Kazuhiro
    Hashizume, Hiroshi
    Iwasaki, Hiroshi
    Tsutsui, Shunji
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2013, 19 (06) : 664 - 671
  • [24] DECOMPRESSION OF LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS
    KARASICK, JL
    NEUROSURGERY, 1990, 27 (03) : 499 - 499
  • [25] POSTOPERATIVE INSTABILITY AFTER DECOMPRESSION FOR LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS
    JOHNSSON, KE
    WILLNER, S
    JOHNSSON, K
    SPINE, 1986, 11 (02) : 107 - 110
  • [26] Risk factors for 90-day reoperation and readmission after lumbar surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis
    Ilyas, Haariss
    Golubovsky, Joshua L.
    Chen, Jingxiao
    Winkelman, Robert D.
    Mroz, Thomas E.
    Steinmetz, Michael P.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2019, 31 (01) : 20 - 26
  • [27] Predictors of residual symptoms in lower extremities after decompression surgery on lumbar spinal stenosis
    Hara, Nobuhiro
    Oka, Hiroyuki
    Yamazaki, Takashi
    Takeshita, Katsushi
    Murakami, Motoaki
    Hoshi, Kazuto
    Terayama, Sei
    Seichi, Atsushi
    Nakamura, Kozo
    Kawaguchi, Hiroshi
    Matsudaira, Ko
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2010, 19 (11) : 1849 - 1854
  • [28] Predictors of residual symptoms in lower extremities after decompression surgery on lumbar spinal stenosis
    Nobuhiro Hara
    Hiroyuki Oka
    Takashi Yamazaki
    Katsushi Takeshita
    Motoaki Murakami
    Kazuto Hoshi
    Sei Terayama
    Atsushi Seichi
    Kozo Nakamura
    Hiroshi Kawaguchi
    Ko Matsudaira
    European Spine Journal, 2010, 19 : 1849 - 1854
  • [29] Decompression, fusion, and instrumentation surgery for complex lumbar spinal stenosis
    Hansraj, KK
    O'Leary, PF
    Cammisa, FP
    Hall, JC
    Fras, CI
    Cohen, MS
    Dorey, FJ
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2001, (384) : 18 - 25
  • [30] Quality of life changes after lumbar decompression in patients with tandem spinal stenosis
    Pennington, Zach
    Alentado, Vincent J.
    Lubelski, Daniel
    Alvin, Matthew D.
    Levin, Jay M.
    Benzel, Edward C.
    Mroz, Thomas E.
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 184