Readmission Rates After Decompression Surgery in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Among Medicare Beneficiaries

被引:52
作者
Modhia, Urvij [1 ]
Takemoto, Steven [1 ]
Braid-Forbes, Mary Jo [2 ]
Weber, Michael [1 ]
Berven, Sigurd H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Orthopaed Surg, San Francisco, CA USA
[2] Braid Forbes Hlth Res, Silver Spring, MD USA
关键词
readmission and reoperation rates; lumbar; spinal stenosis; spinal fusion; Medicare claims; LONG-TERM OUTCOMES; REOPERATION RATES; CLINICAL ARTICLE; OLDER-ADULTS; FUSION; COMPLICATIONS; LAMINECTOMY; MANAGEMENT; INJECTIONS; DISORDERS;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828628f5
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Retrospective observational cohort analysis of administrative claims. Objective. Estimate readmission rates after spine stenosis decompression surgery in a 5% randomly selected sample of Medicare beneficiaries. Summary of Background Data. Operative management of lumbar spinal stenosis has significant and measurable benefits compared with nonoperative care. Revision rates for lumbar decompression with and without fusion have been reported with significant variability. An understanding of readmission and reoperation rates informs decisions regarding the cost-effective management of lumbar stenosis. Methods. Patients were identified in 2005-2009 Medicare claims who had both a procedure code for decompression (03.09), and a diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis (724.02). Patients diagnosed with spondylolisthesis, and those receiving revision surgery or fusion of more than 3 segments were excluded. Kaplan-Meier product limit method was used to estimate univariate rates of readmission for fusion, decompression, or injection and Cox proportional hazards to examine whether fusion decreased the likelihood of readmission. Results. The overall 1-year readmission rate was slightly higher in patients undergoing fusion with decompression (9.7%) than patients who underwent decompression alone (7.2%, P = 0.03). Rates at 2 years were 14.6% and 12.5%, respectively. Patients receiving decompression with fusion were slightly younger and more likely female. Procedures performed during readmission were similar for the fusion and no fusion cohorts with 56% receiving fusion, 23% decompression, and 22% injection for pain management. Of the patients who were not readmitted, more than 25% of patients received outpatient injections for pain management during the 3-month quarter of their surgery and approximately 20% in the subsequent quarter. Conclusion. Readmission rates for spinal stenosis decompression were approximately 8% to 10% per year. Fusion at the index procedure did not protect against subsequent readmission. Large databases can inform choice of surgical options by focusing examination on indications for surgery and reasons for readmission. Fusion along with decompression does not seem to impact readmission rates.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 596
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prognostic Factors for Satisfaction After Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Paulsen, Rune Tendal
    Bouknaitir, Jamal Bech
    Fruensgaard, Soren
    Carreon, Leah
    Andersen, Mikkel
    NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 82 (05) : 645 - 651
  • [2] Sagittal imbalance in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and outcomes after simple decompression surgery
    Shin, E. Kyung
    Kim, Chi Heon
    Chung, Chun Kee
    Choi, Yunhee
    Yim, Dahae
    Jung, Whei
    Park, Sung Bae
    Moon, Jung Hyeon
    Heo, Won
    Kim, Sung-Mi
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 17 (02) : 175 - 182
  • [3] Endoscope-assisted spinal decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis
    Minamide, Akihito
    Yoshida, Munehito
    Yamada, Hiroshi
    Nakagawa, Yukihiro
    Kawai, Masaki
    Maio, Kazuhiro
    Hashizume, Hiroshi
    Iwasaki, Hiroshi
    Tsutsui, Shunji
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2013, 19 (06) : 664 - 671
  • [4] Surgical treatment patterns among Medicare beneficiaries newly diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis
    Chen, Er
    Tong, Kuo Bianchini
    Laouri, Marianne
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2010, 10 (07) : 588 - 594
  • [5] Symptomatic progression of degenerative scoliosis after decompression and limited fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis
    Houten, John K.
    Nasser, Rani
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 20 (04) : 613 - 615
  • [6] Incidence of Revision Surgery After Decompression With vs Without Fusion Among Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Ulrich, Nils H.
    Burgstaller, Jakob M.
    Valeri, Fabio
    Pichierri, Giuseppe
    Betz, Michael
    Fekete, Tamas F.
    Wertli, Maria M.
    Porchet, Francois
    Steurer, Johann
    Farshad, Mazda
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (07) : e2223803
  • [7] Risk factors for 90-day reoperation and readmission after lumbar surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis
    Ilyas, Haariss
    Golubovsky, Joshua L.
    Chen, Jingxiao
    Winkelman, Robert D.
    Mroz, Thomas E.
    Steinmetz, Michael P.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2019, 31 (01) : 20 - 26
  • [8] Postoperative Anemia Following Posterior Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis
    Sasaji, Tatsuro
    Horaguchi, Kiyoshi
    Shinozaki, Nobuhisa
    Yamada, Noboru
    Iwai, Kazuo
    TOHOKU JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2013, 229 (01) : 1 - 4
  • [9] Microendoscopic Lumbar Posterior Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Literature Review
    Suzuki, Akinobu
    Nakamura, Hiroaki
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2022, 58 (03):
  • [10] Decompression Surgery Alone Versus Decompression Plus Fusion in Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Ulrich, Nils H.
    Burgstaller, Jakob M.
    Pichierri, Giuseppe
    Wertli, Maria M.
    Farshad, Mazda
    Porchet, Francois
    Steurer, Johann
    Held, Ulrike
    SPINE, 2017, 42 (18) : E1077 - E1086