A comparison of scenarios for rural development planning and conservation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

被引:16
作者
Nackoney, Janet [1 ]
Williams, David [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Geog Sci, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] African Wildlife Fdn, Washington, DC 20036 USA
关键词
Democratic Republic of the Congo; Congo basin; Land use planning; Marxan; Agriculture; Conservation planning; FOREST COVER; RESERVE; SELECTION; SENSITIVITY; MANAGEMENT; LANDSCAPE; NETWORK; SYSTEMS; DESIGN; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2013.04.011
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Including a diverse set of stakeholders in collaborative land use planning processes is facilitated by data and maps that communicate and inform an array of possible planning options and potential scenarios of future land use change. In northern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), the African Wildlife Foundation (AWF) has engaged stakeholders and the DRC Government to lead a participatory zoning process in the Maringa-Lopori-Wamba (MLW) Landscape. To assist landscape scale macro-zoning efforts, we employed a spatial allocation decision support tool called Marxan to develop a set of three scenarios of potential human and agricultural expansion for 2050. The results offer guidance to stakeholders and assist decision-makers in determining the most suitable land for inclusion in a proposed Rural Development Zone (RDZ), designed to accommodate the expansion of agricultural activities and subsequent deforestation while considering conservation priority areas. We used data describing current patterns of human activity, including historical primary forest loss, land cover suitability for agricultural activity, and presence of important wildlife connectivity zones and protected areas to identify locations where future agricultural expansion might be encouraged. We found that future agricultural demands can be met by expansion around historically intensive agricultural areas in the eastern portion of MLW without significantly compromising conservation priority areas. Wildlife connectivity zones are most vulnerable to future agricultural expansion because of their proximity to current agricultural activity. Our results demonstrate the need to prioritize conservation action in these areas and illustrate how competing needs might be balanced in planning for both agricultural expansion and terrestrial biological conservation in this landscape. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 149
页数:10
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] Determination of deforestation rates of the world's humid tropical forests
    Achard, F
    Eva, HD
    Stibig, HJ
    Mayaux, P
    Gallego, J
    Richards, T
    Malingreau, JP
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2002, 297 (5583) : 999 - 1002
  • [2] Ahern J, 1999, LANDSCAPE ECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS: ISSUES AND APPLICATIONS, P175
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
  • [4] Ardron J.A., 2010, Marxan Good Practices Handbook
  • [5] Ardron J.A., 2008, Marxan good practices handbook
  • [6] Ball I.R., 2000, MARXAN V1 8 2 MARIN
  • [7] Ball I.R., 2009, SPATIAL CONSERVATION
  • [8] Barrientos M., 2011, Index Mundi Country Profile for the Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • [9] Batie Sandra., 2008, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, V90, P176
  • [10] USE OF OPTIMIZATION MODELS IN PUBLIC-SECTOR PLANNING
    BRILL, ED
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1979, 25 (05) : 413 - 422