Structure and Regulation of the Type VI Secretion System

被引:286
|
作者
Silverman, Julie M. [1 ]
Brunet, Yannick R. [2 ]
Cascales, Eric [2 ]
Mougous, Joseph D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Microbiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, Inst Microbiol Mediterranee, UMR7255, F-13402 Marseille, France
来源
ANNUAL REVIEW OF MICROBIOLOGY, VOL 66 | 2012年 / 66卷
关键词
macromolecular; regulation; bacteriophage; interbacterial interactions; host-cell interactions; ENHANCER-BINDING PROTEINS; ICMF FAMILY PROTEIN; BACTERIAL TYPE VI; VIBRIO-CHOLERAE; ESCHERICHIA-COLI; SALMONELLA-TYPHIMURIUM; TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION; LENGTH DETERMINATION; GENE-EXPRESSION; ACUTE INFECTION;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-micro-121809-151619
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The type VI secretion system (T6SS) is a complex and widespread gram-negative bacterial export pathway with the capacity to translocate protein effectors into a diversity of target cell types. Current structural models of the T6SS indicate that the apparatus is composed of at least two complexes, a dynamic bacteriophage-like structure and a cell-envelope-spanning membrane-associated assembly. How these complexes interact to promote effector secretion and cell targeting remains a major question in the field. As a contact-dependent pathway with specific cellular targets, the T6SS is subject to tight regulation. Thus, the identification of regulatory elements that control T6S expression continues to shape our understanding of the environmental circumstances relevant to its function. This review discusses recent progress toward characterizing T6S structure and regulation.
引用
收藏
页码:453 / 472
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pantoea ananatis Utilizes a Type VI Secretion System for Pathogenesis and Bacterial Competition
    Shyntum, Divine Y.
    Theron, Jacques
    Venter, Stephanus N.
    Moleleki, Lucy N.
    Toth, Ian K.
    Coutinho, Teresa A.
    MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS, 2015, 28 (04) : 420 - 431
  • [22] Quantification of type VI secretion system activity in macrophages infected with Burkholderia cenocepacia
    Aubert, Daniel F.
    Hu, Sherry
    Valvano, Miguel A.
    MICROBIOLOGY-SGM, 2015, 161 : 2161 - 2173
  • [23] Deadly syringes: type VI secretion system activities in pathogenicity and interbacterial competition
    Kapitein, Nicole
    Mogk, Axel
    CURRENT OPINION IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2013, 16 (01) : 52 - 58
  • [24] Crystal structure of the bacterial type VI secretion system component TssL from Vibrio cholerae
    Chang, Jeong Ho
    Kim, Yeon-Gil
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2015, 53 (01) : 32 - 37
  • [25] Double Tubular Contractile Structure of the Type VI Secretion System Displays Striking Flexibility and Elasticity
    Stietz, Maria Silvina
    Liang, Xiaoye
    Wong, Megan
    Hersch, Steven
    Dong, Tao G.
    JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, 2020, 202 (01)
  • [26] Crystal structure of the periplasmic domain of TssL, a key membrane component of Type VI secretion system
    Wang, Xiangbei
    Sun, Bo
    Xu, Mengxue
    Qiu, Shenshen
    Xu, Dongqing
    Ran, Tingting
    He, Jianhua
    Wang, Weiwu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MACROMOLECULES, 2018, 120 : 1474 - 1479
  • [27] Regulation of type VI secretion systems at the transcriptional, posttranscriptional and posttranslational level
    Hespanhol, Julia Takuno
    Nobrega-Silva, Luize
    Bayer-Santos, Ethel
    MICROBIOLOGY-SGM, 2023, 169 (08):
  • [28] Structural biology of type VI secretion systems
    Cascales, Eric
    Cambillau, Christian
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 367 (1592) : 1102 - 1111
  • [29] Rules of Engagement: The Type VI Secretion System in Vibrio cholerae
    Joshi, Avatar
    Kostiuk, Benjamin
    Rogers, Andrew
    Teschler, Jennifer
    Pukatzki, Stefan
    Yildiz, Fitnat H.
    TRENDS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 25 (04) : 267 - 279
  • [30] Towards a complete structural deciphering of Type VI secretion system
    Van Son Nguyen
    Douzi, Badreddine
    Durand, Eric
    Roussel, Alain
    Cascales, Eric
    Cambillau, Christian
    CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2018, 49 : 77 - 84