How should healthcare be reported in Catalonia? Qualitative study with healthcare leaders

被引:2
作者
Garcia-Altes, Anna [1 ]
Aguado, Hortensia [1 ]
Guilabert, Mercedes [2 ]
Carrillo, Irene [2 ]
Mira, Jose Joaquin [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Agencia Qualitat & Avaluacio Sanitaries Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Miguel Hernandez Elche ES, Elche, Spain
[3] Fdn Promot Hlth & Biomed Res, Atenea Res Grp, Sant Joan dAlacant, Spain
关键词
Reporting; Benchmarking; Focus groups; Qualitative research; Healthcare quality;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-022-08718-4
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The Results Centre is the name of a project that, since 2012, has been openly publishing the results of each healthcare centre in Catalonia, with the idea of promoting benchmarking among centres and transparency toward society. As the project evolves, it has become increasingly necessary to adapt its contents and formats. The objective of this study is to identify the preferences and expectations of healthcare leaders regarding the Results Centre. Methods A qualitative study was conducted using the nominal group technique. Five nominal groups were created with the participation of 58 professionals (26 from hospital care, 16 from primary care, and 16 from long-term care centres). The areas of analysis were: (1) what the Results Centre of the future should be like; (2) what information needs should be addressed; and (3) what novelties should be incorporated to stimulate quality improvement. The spontaneity of ideas, intensity of recommendations, and intergroup consistency were analysed. The study was conducted in April 2019. Results The requirements reported by the participants to be met by the Results Centre included: being a tool for benchmarking and strategic decision-making; adjusted and segmented indicators; non-clinical information (patient experience, socio-economic status, etc.); and data accessible to all stakeholders, including citizens. The ideas were consistent across the different levels of care, although the intensity of recommendations varied depending on their content. Conclusions Regional agencies that are accountable for health outcomes should be consistently committed to adapting to the needs of different stakeholders in the health system. This project is an example of how this requirement has been addressed in Catalonia.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[21]  
Mira JJ., 2018, REVISI N REVISIONES, V41, P91
[22]  
Mira JJ., 2003, REV CALID ASIST, V18, P209, DOI [10.1016/S1134-282X(03)77606-4, DOI 10.1016/S1134-282X(03)77606-4]
[23]  
Mira José Joaquín, 2004, Gac Sanit, V18, P205, DOI 10.1157/13063097
[24]   Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping review [J].
Mitton, Craig ;
Smith, Neale ;
Peacock, Stuart ;
Evoy, Brian ;
Abelson, Julia .
HEALTH POLICY, 2009, 91 (03) :219-228
[25]  
Mogollon AS., 2006, INTRODUCCI N T CNICA, P53
[26]  
Observatori del Sistema de Salut de Catalunya, 2018, CENTR RES AMB HOSP D
[27]   Health care public reporting utilization - user clusters, web trails, and usage barriers on Germany's public reporting portal Weisse-Liste.de [J].
Pross, Christoph ;
Averdunk, Lars-Henrik ;
Stjepanovic, Josip ;
Busse, Reinhard ;
Geissler, Alexander .
BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2017, 17
[28]  
Public Reporting, 2016, SPOTL HEALTHC
[29]   What kind of health information does the public need? Results of a qualitative study [J].
Ruiz-Munoz, D. ;
Aguado, H. ;
Garcia-Altes, A. .
JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE QUALITY RESEARCH, 2018, 33 (03) :130-135
[30]   Improving surgical outcomes through benchmarking [J].
Staiger, R. D. ;
Schwandt, H. ;
Puhan, M. A. ;
Clavien, P. -A. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 106 (01) :59-+