Comparing the embolic potential of open and closed cell stents during carotid angioplasty and stenting

被引:20
|
作者
Tadros, Rami O. [1 ]
Spyris, Constantinos T. [1 ]
Vouyouka, Ageliki G. [1 ]
Chung, Christine [1 ]
Krishnan, Prakash [1 ]
Arnold, Margaret W. [1 ]
Marin, Michael L. [1 ]
Faries, Peter L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Vasc Surg, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
ENDARTERECTOMY; DESIGN; TRIAL; INTERVENTION; PREVENTION; IMPACT; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2011.12.077
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: We sought to determine the effects of open (O) and closed (C) cell stents on the size and number of embolic particles generated during carotid artery stenting (CAS) and assess the impact on outcome. Methods: Embolic debris from carotid filters after CAS was analyzed using photomicroscopy and imaging software. Patient comorbidities, preoperative cerebrovascular symptoms, stent type, and outcomes (perioperative major adverse events) were examined. Results: Carotid filters from 173 consecutive CAS procedures (O, 125 and C, 48) were reviewed. The mean age was 70.9 +/- 9.2 years; 58% were men. Mean stenosis was 88.2% +/- 8.1%; 36.6% had neurological symptoms preprocedurally. There was no difference in preoperative symptoms between the two groups (O, 38.7% vs C, 31.3%; P = not significant [NS]). However, closed cell stent use was associated with higher degree of stenosis (O, 87.2% +/- 8.0% vs C, 90.6% +/- 7.8%; P = .01), an older age (O, 70.0 +/- 8.6 years vs C, 73.4 +/- 10.2 years; P = .03), and peripheral arterial disease (21.1% vs 43.5%; P = .01). A larger mean particle size was observed in patients treated with open cell stents compared to closed cell stents (O, 416.5 +/- 335.7 mu m vs C, 301.1 +/- 251.3 mu m; P = .03). There was no significant difference in the total number of particles (O, 13.8 +/- 21.5 vs C, 17.6 +/- 19.9; P = NS), periprocedural stroke (P = NS), and major adverse events between the two groups (P = NS). Conclusions: Open cell stents are associated with a larger mean particle size compared to closed cell stents. No impact on procedural outcomes based on stent type was observed. (J Vasc Surg 2012;56:89-95.)
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 95
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical Analysis Comparing Efficacy between a Distal Filter Protection Device and Proximal Balloon Occlusion Device during Carotid Artery Stenting
    Lee, Jong Hyeok
    Sohn, Hee Eon
    Chung, Seung Young
    Park, Moon Sun
    Kim, Seong Min
    Lee, Do Sung
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 58 (04) : 316 - 320
  • [32] Usefulness of dual protection combined with blood aspiration for distal embolic protection during carotid artery stenting
    Sakamoto, Shigeyuki
    Kiura, Yoshihiro
    Okazaki, Takahito
    Shinagawa, Katsuhiro
    Ichinose, Nobuhiko
    Shibukawa, Masaaki
    Orita, Yoji
    Shimonaga, Koji
    Kajihara, Yosuke
    Kurisu, Kaoru
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2015, 157 (03) : 371 - 377
  • [33] Comparison of dual protection and distal filter protection as a distal embolic protection method during carotid artery stenting: a single-center carotid artery stenting experience
    Kajihara, Yosuke
    Sakamoto, Shigeyuki
    Kiura, Yoshihiro
    Mukada, Kazutoshi
    Chaki, Takahiro
    Kajihara, Shiro
    Kurisu, Kaoru
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2015, 38 (04) : 671 - 676
  • [34] Dual-layered stents reduce cerebral embolism compared with first-generation stents during carotid stenting of high lipid core plaque lesions
    Nakagawa, Ichiro
    Kotsugi, Masashi
    Yokoyama, Shohei
    Maeoka, Ryosuke
    Furuta, Takanori
    Tanaka, Haku
    Takeshima, Yasuhiro
    Matsuda, Ryosuke
    Yamada, Shuichi
    Nakase, Hiroyuki
    JOURNAL OF NEUROINTERVENTIONAL SURGERY, 2024, 16 (01) : 67 - 72
  • [35] Comparison of anti-embolic protection with proximal balloon occlusion and filter devices during carotid artery stenting: clinical and procedural outcomes
    Tatli, Ersan
    Buturak, Ali
    Grunduz, Yasemin
    Dogan, Emir
    Alkan, Mustafa
    Sayin, Murat
    Yilmaztepe, Mustafa
    Atakay, Selcuk
    POSTEPY W KARDIOLOGII INTERWENCYJNEJ, 2013, 9 (03): : 221 - 227
  • [36] Distal embolic protection use during transfemoral carotid artery stenting is associated with improved in-hospital outcomes
    Wang, Sophie X.
    Marcaccio, Christina L.
    Patel, Priya B.
    Giles, Kristina A.
    Soden, Peter A.
    Schermerhorn, Marc L.
    Liang, Patric
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 77 (06)
  • [37] The role of embolic protection devices during carotid stenting prior to cardiac surgery in asymptomatic patients: Empty filters?
    Van der Heyden, Jan
    Wolters, Frank J.
    Garin, Nathalie
    Blant, Snezana Andrejevic
    Inglin, Marc
    Bal, E. T.
    Suttorp, Jan-Maarten
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2012, 80 (01) : 112 - 119
  • [38] Outcome of carotid artery stenting at 2 years follow-up: comparison of nitinol open cell versus stainless steel closed cell stent design
    Maleux, G.
    Marrannes, J.
    Heye, S.
    Daenens, K.
    Verhamme, P.
    Thijs, V.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 50 (05) : 669 - 675
  • [39] The relationship between ultrasonographic plaque morphology and histopathology of embolic material captured in the protective filter during carotid artery stenting
    Karacif, Onur
    Ergun, Onur
    Turkmenoglu, Tugba Taskin
    Conkbayir, Isik
    Durmaz, Hasanali
    Hekimoglu, Azad
    Hekimoglu, Baki
    INTERVENTIONAL NEURORADIOLOGY, 2023, 29 (03) : 285 - 290
  • [40] Treatment Results of Carotid Artery Stenting with an Open-Cell Stent: Analysis of 734 Consecutive Cases at a Single Center
    Omura, Yoshihiro
    Imamura, Hirotoshi
    Tani, Shoichi
    Adachi, Hidemitsu
    Sakaguchi, Manabu
    Todo, Kenichi
    Yamagami, Hiroshi
    Goto, Masanori
    Ohara, Nobuyuki
    Fukumitsu, Ryu
    Sunohara, Tadashi
    Matsumoto, Shirabe
    Fukui, Nobuyuki
    Fukuda, Tatsumaru
    Akiyama, Tomoaki
    Ohta, Tsuyoshi
    Sakai, Chiaki
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 187 : E453 - E459