Fracture Strength and Failure Mode of Maxillary Implant-Supported Provisional Single Crowns: A Comparison of Composite Resin Crowns Fabricated Directly Over PEEK Abutments and Solid Titanium Abutments

被引:77
作者
Santing, Hendrik Jacob [1 ]
Meijer, Henny J. A. [1 ,2 ]
Raghoebar, Gerry M. [1 ]
Oezcan, Mutlu [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Dept Fixed & Removable Prosthodont, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Zurich, Dent Mat Unit, Ctr Dent & Oral Med, Clin Fixed & Removable Prosthodont & Dent Mat Sci, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
composite resin; dental; failure type; fracture strength; implant-supported; provisional; ALL-CERAMIC RESTORATIONS; AESTHETIC ZONE; DENTAL IMPLANTS; BITE FORCE; IMMEDIATE; RESISTANCE; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00322.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) temporary abutments have been recently introduced for making implant-supported provisional single crowns. Little information is available in the dental literature on the durability of provisional implant-supported restorations. Purpose: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the fracture strength of implant-supported composite resin crowns on PEEK and solid titanium temporary abutments, and to analyze the failure types. Material and Methods: Three types of provisional abutments, RN synOcta Temporary Meso Abutment (PEEK; Straumann), RN synOcta Titanium Post for Temporary Restorations (Straumann), and Temporary Abutment Engaging NobRplRP (Nobel Biocare) were used, and provisional screw-retained crowns using composite resin (Solidex) were fabricated for four different locations in the maxilla. The specimens were tested in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute until fracture occurred. The failure types were analyzed and further categorized as irreparable (Type 1) or reparable (Type 2). Results: No significant difference was found between different abutment types. Only for the position of the maxillary central incisor, composite resin crowns on PEEK temporary abutments showed significantly lower (p < 0.05) fracture strength (95 +/- 21 N) than those on titanium temporary abutments (1,009 +/- 94 N). The most frequently experienced failure types were cohesive fractures of the composite resin crowns (75 out of 104), followed by screw loosening (18 out of 104). According to reparability, the majority of the specimens were classified as Type 1 (82 out of 104). Type 2 failures were not often observed (22 out of 104). Conclusions: Provisional crowns on PEEK abutments showed similar fracture strength as titanium temporary abutments except for central incisors. Maxillary right central incisor composite resin crowns on PEEK temporary abutments fractured below the mean anterior masticatory loading forces reported to be approximately 206 N.
引用
收藏
页码:882 / 889
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Andersson B, 1995, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V10, P702
  • [2] Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: An in vitro study
    Att, W
    Kurun, S
    Gerds, T
    Strub, JR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2006, 95 (02) : 111 - 116
  • [3] Avivi-Arber L, 1996, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V11, P311
  • [4] Single tooth immediate provisional restoration of dental implants: Technique and early results
    Block, M
    Finger, I
    Castellon, P
    Lirettle, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2004, 62 (09) : 1131 - 1138
  • [5] Techniques to facilitate provisionalization of implant restorations
    Castellon, P
    Casadaban, M
    Block, MS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 63 (09) : 72 - 79
  • [6] Treatment outcome of immediate, early and conventional single-tooth implants in the aesthetic zone: a systematic review to survival, bone level, soft-tissue, aesthetics and patient satisfaction
    den Hartog, Laurens
    Huddleston Slater, James J. R.
    Vissink, Arjan
    Meijer, Henny J. A.
    Raghoebar, Gerry M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2008, 35 (12) : 1073 - 1086
  • [7] Technique for fabricating a cement-retained single-unit implant-supported provisional restoration in the esthetic zone
    Ganddini, MR
    Tallents, RH
    Ercoli, C
    Ganddini, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2005, 94 (03) : 296 - 298
  • [8] Glauser R, 2004, INT J PROSTHODONT, V17, P285
  • [9] FUNCTIONAL-STATE, BITE FORCE AND POSTURAL MUSCLE-ACTIVITY IN PATIENTS WITH OSSEOINTEGRATED ORAL IMPLANT BRIDGES
    HARALDSON, T
    CARLSSON, GE
    INGERVALL, B
    [J]. ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1979, 37 (04) : 195 - 206
  • [10] THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MAXIMAL BITE FORCE, BITE FORCE ENDURANCE, AND FACIAL MORPHOLOGY DURING GROWTH - A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
    KILIARIDIS, S
    KJELLBERG, H
    WENNEBERG, B
    ENGSTROM, C
    [J]. ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1993, 51 (05) : 323 - 331