Organizational Rules and Cognitive Uncertainty Among Public Professionals: A Daily Diary Study

被引:9
作者
Bernards, Bernard [1 ]
van der Voet, Joris [1 ]
van der Pas, Suzan [2 ,3 ]
Groeneveld, Sandra [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Inst Publ Adm, Publ Management, The Hague, Netherlands
[2] Univ Appl Sci Leiden, Social Innovat & Entrepreneurship, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
diary study; cognitive uncertainty; rule characteristics; formalization; red tape; green tape; RED TAPE; FORMALIZATION; MANAGEMENT; BUREAUCRACY; LIFE;
D O I
10.1177/0734371X20943932
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Although public management and human resource management research has extensively investigated the motivational effects of organizational rules, the original utility of organizational rules-uncertainty reduction-has remained overlooked. This study takes a cognitive perspective by examining how organizational rules relate to uncertainty experiences of public professionals. In this study, we provide a dynamic perspective on the relationship between organizational rules and uncertainty through a 2-week daily online diary study among 65 public professionals in the Netherlands. The results indicate that the amount and consistency of rules are related to professionals' daily uncertainty experiences. Moreover, within-person experiences of rules and uncertainty are highly variable over time. We argue that a cognitive perspective of uncertainty reduction can broaden our understanding of the consequences of organizational rules in managing people, and that the dynamic nature of organizational rule experiences cannot be a mere footnote in future public administration and human resource management research.
引用
收藏
页码:792 / 813
页数:22
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive
    Adler, PS
    Borys, B
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1996, 41 (01) : 61 - 89
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2017, STRUCTURED FAIL REGU
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1970, ADM BEHAV STUDY DECI
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1979, The structuring of organizations: The synthesis of the research
  • [5] TIGHTENING THE IRON CAGE - CONCERTIVE CONTROL IN SELF-MANAGING TEAMS
    BARKER, JR
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1993, 38 (03) : 408 - 437
  • [6] Group Size, ICC Values, and Group-Level Correlations: A Simulation
    Bliese, Paul D.
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 1998, 1 (04) : 355 - 373
  • [7] Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived
    Bolger, N
    Davis, A
    Rafaeli, E
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 54 : 579 - 616
  • [8] Formalization and consistency heighten organizational rule following: Experimental and survey evidence
    Borry, Erin L.
    DeHart-Davis, Leisha
    Kaufmann, Wesley
    Merritt, Cullen C.
    Mohr, Zachary
    Tummers, Lars
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2018, 96 (02) : 368 - 385
  • [9] Public and private management: What's the difference?
    Boyne, GA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2002, 39 (01) : 97 - 122
  • [10] Bozeman B., 2011, Rules and Red Tape: A Prism for Public Administration Theory and Research