Migration in last decade to high-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

被引:2
作者
Patard, P. -M. [1 ]
Roumiguie, M. [1 ]
Prudhomme, T. [1 ]
Doumerc, N. [1 ]
Thoulouzan, M. [1 ]
Game, X. [1 ]
de la Taille, A. [2 ]
Rischmann, P. [1 ]
Soulie, M. [1 ]
Salomon, L. [2 ]
Beauval, J. -B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Paul Sabatier Univ, CHU Rangueil, Dept Urol Androl & Renal Transplantat, 1 Ave J Poulhes, F-31059 Toulouse, France
[2] Henri Mondor Hosp, AP HP, Dept Urol, 51 Ave Marechal de Lattre de Tassigny, F-94010 Creteil, France
来源
PROGRES EN UROLOGIE | 2019年 / 29卷 / 01期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Stage migration; PATHOLOGICALLY FAVORABLE DISEASE; SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT; STAGE MIGRATION; TRENDS; MEN; IDENTIFICATION; ULTRASOUND; EVOLUTION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.purol.2018.09.008
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective. - There is controversy around prostate cancer (PCa) screening through the use of PSA, due to the risk of overtreatment. The current trend observed in various European and American studies is a decrease in the number of radical prostatectomy (RP) in low-risk PCa and an increase for intermediate or locally advanced diseases. The objective of this study was to observe the migration of the pathological stages from radical prostatectomy (RP) over 10 years in France through 2 French centers. Methods. - It was a multicentric retrospective study, where all the RP realized in 2 French tertiary centers, in a laparoscopic or retropubic approach for each of the years 2005, 2010 and 2015 were included. Preoperative data (age, PSA, clinical stage, number of positive biopsies, Gleason biopsy score) and postoperative data (pTNM, pathological Gleason score (pGS)) were analyzed and compared. Results. - In all, 1282 RP were realized (503 in 2005, 403 in 2010, 376 in 2015). Respectively between 2005, 2010, 2015 the average number of positive biopsy increased significantly from 2.30 vs. 2.88 vs. 5.3 (P=0.0001). The distribution of D'Amico's risk evolves with time: low-risk: 49.9 vs. 44.4 vs. 15.7% (P=0.0001); intermediate risk: 40.95 vs. 43.92 vs. 64.1% (P=0.0001) and high-risk: 9.15 vs. 11.66 vs. 20.2% (P=0.0001) between 2005, 2010 and 2015 respectively. pGS evolved to higher score with SG < 7: 22.8 vs. 29.9 vs. 7.1% et SG >= 7: 77.2 vs. 70.1 vs. 92.9% (P=0.001). Also, pTNM increased to non-organ-confined disease: pT2: 66.9 vs. 51.9 vs. 48.7%; pT3: 33.1 vs. 48.1 vs. 51.3% (P=0.0001). Conclusion. - This study showed a change in the management of PCa since new recommendations from medical authorities about PSA screening and evolving of conservative treatment. Number of RP increase for higher risk PCa. This change corresponds to better patient selection for RP: decrease for low-risk and increase for high-risk organ-confined disease. (C) 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 35
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Substratification of high-risk localised prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy
    Michele Lodde
    François Harel
    Louis Lacombe
    Yves Fradet
    World Journal of Urology, 2008, 26 : 225 - 229
  • [32] Robotic radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer: current perspectives
    Canda, Abdullah Erdem
    Balbay, Mevlana Derya
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2015, 17 (06) : 908 - 915
  • [33] Surgical Outcomes in High-risk Prostate Cancer and Salvage Radical Prostatectomy
    Avda, Yuval
    Modai, Jonathan
    Shpunt, Igal
    Dinerman, Michael
    Shilo, Yaniv
    Croock, Roy
    Jaber, Morad
    Linder, Uri
    Leibovici, Dan
    ISRAEL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2021, 23 (12): : 777 - 782
  • [34] High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Role of Radical Prostatectomy and Radiation Therapy
    Qi, Robert
    Moul, Judd
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2015, 38 (12) : 639 - 644
  • [35] Substratification of high-risk localised prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy
    Lodde, Michele
    Harel, Francois
    Lacombe, Louis
    Fradet, Yves
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 26 (03) : 225 - 229
  • [36] Contemporaneous comparison of open vs minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer
    Pierorazio, Phillip M.
    Mullins, Jeffrey K.
    Eifler, John B.
    Voth, Kipp
    Hyams, Elias S.
    Han, Misop
    Pavlovich, Christian P.
    Bivalacqua, Trinity J.
    Partin, Alan W.
    Allaf, Mohamad E.
    Schaeffer, Edward M.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 112 (06) : 751 - 757
  • [37] Primary radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer A Decision Analysis
    Parikh, Ravi
    Sher, David J.
    CANCER, 2012, 118 (01) : 258 - 267
  • [38] Neoadjuvant Treatment of High-Risk, Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Prior to Radical Prostatectomy
    Eugene J. Pietzak
    James A. Eastham
    Current Urology Reports, 2016, 17
  • [39] Radical prostatectomy vs radiation therapy and androgen-suppression therapy in high-risk prostate cancer
    Westover, Kenneth
    Chen, Ming-Hui
    Moul, Judd
    Robertson, Cary
    Polascik, Thomas
    Dosoretz, Daniel
    Katin, Michael
    Salenius, Sharon
    D'Amico, Anthony V.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 (08) : 1116 - 1121
  • [40] Neoadjuvant Treatment of High-Risk, Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Prior to Radical Prostatectomy
    Pietzak, Eugene J.
    Eastham, James A.
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2016, 17 (05)