Migration in last decade to high-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

被引:2
|
作者
Patard, P. -M. [1 ]
Roumiguie, M. [1 ]
Prudhomme, T. [1 ]
Doumerc, N. [1 ]
Thoulouzan, M. [1 ]
Game, X. [1 ]
de la Taille, A. [2 ]
Rischmann, P. [1 ]
Soulie, M. [1 ]
Salomon, L. [2 ]
Beauval, J. -B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Paul Sabatier Univ, CHU Rangueil, Dept Urol Androl & Renal Transplantat, 1 Ave J Poulhes, F-31059 Toulouse, France
[2] Henri Mondor Hosp, AP HP, Dept Urol, 51 Ave Marechal de Lattre de Tassigny, F-94010 Creteil, France
来源
PROGRES EN UROLOGIE | 2019年 / 29卷 / 01期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Stage migration; PATHOLOGICALLY FAVORABLE DISEASE; SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT; STAGE MIGRATION; TRENDS; MEN; IDENTIFICATION; ULTRASOUND; EVOLUTION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.purol.2018.09.008
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective. - There is controversy around prostate cancer (PCa) screening through the use of PSA, due to the risk of overtreatment. The current trend observed in various European and American studies is a decrease in the number of radical prostatectomy (RP) in low-risk PCa and an increase for intermediate or locally advanced diseases. The objective of this study was to observe the migration of the pathological stages from radical prostatectomy (RP) over 10 years in France through 2 French centers. Methods. - It was a multicentric retrospective study, where all the RP realized in 2 French tertiary centers, in a laparoscopic or retropubic approach for each of the years 2005, 2010 and 2015 were included. Preoperative data (age, PSA, clinical stage, number of positive biopsies, Gleason biopsy score) and postoperative data (pTNM, pathological Gleason score (pGS)) were analyzed and compared. Results. - In all, 1282 RP were realized (503 in 2005, 403 in 2010, 376 in 2015). Respectively between 2005, 2010, 2015 the average number of positive biopsy increased significantly from 2.30 vs. 2.88 vs. 5.3 (P=0.0001). The distribution of D'Amico's risk evolves with time: low-risk: 49.9 vs. 44.4 vs. 15.7% (P=0.0001); intermediate risk: 40.95 vs. 43.92 vs. 64.1% (P=0.0001) and high-risk: 9.15 vs. 11.66 vs. 20.2% (P=0.0001) between 2005, 2010 and 2015 respectively. pGS evolved to higher score with SG < 7: 22.8 vs. 29.9 vs. 7.1% et SG >= 7: 77.2 vs. 70.1 vs. 92.9% (P=0.001). Also, pTNM increased to non-organ-confined disease: pT2: 66.9 vs. 51.9 vs. 48.7%; pT3: 33.1 vs. 48.1 vs. 51.3% (P=0.0001). Conclusion. - This study showed a change in the management of PCa since new recommendations from medical authorities about PSA screening and evolving of conservative treatment. Number of RP increase for higher risk PCa. This change corresponds to better patient selection for RP: decrease for low-risk and increase for high-risk organ-confined disease. (C) 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 35
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] High-risk localized prostate cancer: role of radical prostatectomy
    Grubb, Robert L.
    Kibel, Adam S.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2010, 20 (03) : 204 - 210
  • [22] The role of radical prostatectomy in high-risk localized, node-positive and metastatic prostate cancer
    Ristau, Benjamin T.
    Cahn, David
    Uzzo, Robert G.
    Chapin, Brian F.
    Smaldone, Marc C.
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2016, 12 (05) : 687 - 699
  • [23] Radiotherapy before and after radical prostatectomy for high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer
    Perez, Bradford A.
    Koontz, Bridget F.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2015, 33 (05) : 226 - 234
  • [24] Pathological results and rates of treatment failure in high-risk prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy
    Walz, Jochen
    Joniau, Steven
    Chun, Felix K.
    Isbarn, Hendrik
    Jeldres, Claudio
    Yossepowitch, Ofer
    Chao-Yu, Hsu
    Klein, Eric A.
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Reuther, Alwyn
    Van Poppel, Hein
    Graefen, Markus
    Huland, Hartwig
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 107 (05) : 765 - 770
  • [25] Heterogeneity in Definitions of High-risk Prostate Cancer and Varying Impact on Mortality Rates after Radical Prostatectomy
    Mossanen, Matthew
    Nepple, Kenneth G.
    Grubb, Robert L., III
    Androile, Gerald L.
    Kallogjeri, Dorina
    Klein, Eric A.
    Stephenson, Andrew J.
    Kibel, Adam S.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2018, 1 (02): : 143 - 148
  • [26] Is PSA Still the Best Predictor for Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy in High-Risk Prostate Cancer?
    Akan, Serkan
    Guner, Numan Dogu
    Ediz, Caner
    Sahin, Aytac
    Verit, Ayhan
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY, 2022, 35 (10) : 1733 - 1738
  • [27] The role of extended pelvic lymphadenectomy with radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer
    Harbin, Andrew C.
    Eun, Daniel D.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2015, 33 (05) : 208 - 216
  • [28] Pathological findings and prostate-specific antigen outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    Salomon, Laurent
    Allory, Yves
    Terry, Stephane
    Vordos, Dimitri
    Hoznek, Andreas
    Abbou, Claude-Clement
    Vacherot, Francis
    de la Taille, Alexandre
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 106 (01) : 86 - 90
  • [29] Risk-Adjusted Hazard Rates of Biochemical Recurrence for Prostate Cancer Patients after Radical Prostatectomy
    Walz, Jochen
    Chun, Felix K. H.
    Klein, Eric A.
    Reuther, Alwyn
    Graefen, Markus
    Huland, Hartwig
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 55 (02) : 412 - 421
  • [30] Defining prostate cancer risk after radical prostatectomy
    Adamis, S.
    Varkaralcis, I. M.
    EJSO, 2014, 40 (05): : 496 - 504