Migration in last decade to high-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

被引:2
|
作者
Patard, P. -M. [1 ]
Roumiguie, M. [1 ]
Prudhomme, T. [1 ]
Doumerc, N. [1 ]
Thoulouzan, M. [1 ]
Game, X. [1 ]
de la Taille, A. [2 ]
Rischmann, P. [1 ]
Soulie, M. [1 ]
Salomon, L. [2 ]
Beauval, J. -B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Paul Sabatier Univ, CHU Rangueil, Dept Urol Androl & Renal Transplantat, 1 Ave J Poulhes, F-31059 Toulouse, France
[2] Henri Mondor Hosp, AP HP, Dept Urol, 51 Ave Marechal de Lattre de Tassigny, F-94010 Creteil, France
来源
PROGRES EN UROLOGIE | 2019年 / 29卷 / 01期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Stage migration; PATHOLOGICALLY FAVORABLE DISEASE; SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT; STAGE MIGRATION; TRENDS; MEN; IDENTIFICATION; ULTRASOUND; EVOLUTION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.purol.2018.09.008
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective. - There is controversy around prostate cancer (PCa) screening through the use of PSA, due to the risk of overtreatment. The current trend observed in various European and American studies is a decrease in the number of radical prostatectomy (RP) in low-risk PCa and an increase for intermediate or locally advanced diseases. The objective of this study was to observe the migration of the pathological stages from radical prostatectomy (RP) over 10 years in France through 2 French centers. Methods. - It was a multicentric retrospective study, where all the RP realized in 2 French tertiary centers, in a laparoscopic or retropubic approach for each of the years 2005, 2010 and 2015 were included. Preoperative data (age, PSA, clinical stage, number of positive biopsies, Gleason biopsy score) and postoperative data (pTNM, pathological Gleason score (pGS)) were analyzed and compared. Results. - In all, 1282 RP were realized (503 in 2005, 403 in 2010, 376 in 2015). Respectively between 2005, 2010, 2015 the average number of positive biopsy increased significantly from 2.30 vs. 2.88 vs. 5.3 (P=0.0001). The distribution of D'Amico's risk evolves with time: low-risk: 49.9 vs. 44.4 vs. 15.7% (P=0.0001); intermediate risk: 40.95 vs. 43.92 vs. 64.1% (P=0.0001) and high-risk: 9.15 vs. 11.66 vs. 20.2% (P=0.0001) between 2005, 2010 and 2015 respectively. pGS evolved to higher score with SG < 7: 22.8 vs. 29.9 vs. 7.1% et SG >= 7: 77.2 vs. 70.1 vs. 92.9% (P=0.001). Also, pTNM increased to non-organ-confined disease: pT2: 66.9 vs. 51.9 vs. 48.7%; pT3: 33.1 vs. 48.1 vs. 51.3% (P=0.0001). Conclusion. - This study showed a change in the management of PCa since new recommendations from medical authorities about PSA screening and evolving of conservative treatment. Number of RP increase for higher risk PCa. This change corresponds to better patient selection for RP: decrease for low-risk and increase for high-risk organ-confined disease. (C) 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 35
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of stage migration and practice changes on high-risk prostate cancer: results from patients treated with radical prostatectomy over the last two decades
    Fossati, Nicola
    Passoni, Niccolo M.
    Moschini, Marco
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Larcher, Alessandro
    Freschi, Massimo
    Guazzoni, Giorgio
    Sjoberg, Daniel D.
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 117 (05) : 740 - 747
  • [2] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer
    Di Benedetto, Antonina
    Soares, Ricardo
    Dovey, Zach
    Bott, Simon
    McGregor, Roy G.
    Eden, Christopher G.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 115 (05) : 780 - 786
  • [3] Radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: Biochemical outcome
    Kawamorita, Naoki
    Saito, Seiichi
    Ishidoya, Shigeto
    Ito, Akihiro
    Saito, Hideo
    Kato, Masanori
    Arai, Yoichi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 16 (09) : 733 - 738
  • [4] Radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer
    Ischia, Joseph
    Gleave, Martin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 20 (03) : 290 - 300
  • [5] Identification of curable high-risk prostate cancer using radical prostatectomy alone: who are the good candidates for undergoing radical prostatectomy among patients with high-risk prostate cancer?
    Nagao, Kazuhiro
    Matsuyama, Hideyasu
    Matsumoto, Hiroaki
    Nasu, Takahito
    Yamamoto, Mitsutaka
    Kamiryo, Yoriaki
    Baba, Yoshikazu
    Suga, Akinobu
    Tei, Yasuhide
    Yoshihiro, Satoru
    Aoki, Akihiko
    Shimabukuro, Tomoyuki
    Joko, Keiji
    Sakano, Shigeru
    Takai, Kimio
    Yamaguchi, Shiro
    Akao, Jumpei
    Kitahara, Seiji
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 23 (04) : 757 - 764
  • [6] Radical Prostatectomy as Primary Treatment of High-risk Prostate Cancer
    Ingels, Alexandre
    de la Taille, Alexandre
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2012, 13 (02) : 179 - 186
  • [7] Radical Prostatectomy as Primary Treatment of High-risk Prostate Cancer
    Alexandre Ingels
    Alexandre de la Taille
    Guillaume Ploussard
    Current Urology Reports, 2012, 13 : 179 - 186
  • [8] High-risk prostate cancer: The oncological efficiency of radical prostatectomy
    Veliyev, E. I.
    Sokolov, E. A.
    Loran, O. B.
    Petrov, S. B.
    ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2014, 10 (01): : 53 - 57
  • [9] Definition of high-risk prostate cancer impacts oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy
    Knipper, Sophie
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Heinze, Alexander
    Preisser, Felix
    Steuber, Thomas
    Huland, Hartwig
    Graefen, Markus
    Tilki, Derya
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 38 (04) : 184 - 190
  • [10] The role of radical prostatectomy as an initial approach for the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer
    Jaunarena, J. H.
    Villamil, W.
    Martinez, P. F.
    Gueglio, G.
    Giudice, C. R.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2016, 40 (06): : 353 - 360