Open Versus Laparoscopic Resection of Primary Tumor for Incurable Stage IV Colorectal Cancer A Large Multicenter Consecutive Patients Cohort Study

被引:30
作者
Hida, Koya [1 ,9 ]
Hasegawa, Suguru
Kinjo, Yousuke
Yoshimura, Kenichi [2 ]
Inomata, Masafumi [3 ]
Ito, Masaaki [4 ]
Fukunaga, Yosuke [5 ]
Kanazawa, Akiyoshi [6 ]
Idani, Hitoshi [7 ]
Sakai, Yoshiharu
Watanabe, Masahiko [8 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ Hosp, Div Gastrointestinal Surg, Dept Surg, Sakyo Ku, Kyoto 6068507, Japan
[2] Kyoto Univ Hosp, Translat Res Ctr, Kyoto 6068507, Japan
[3] Oita Univ, Fac Med, Dept Gastroenterol Surg, Oita, Japan
[4] Natl Canc Hosp E, Dept Colorectal & Pelv Surg, Chiba, Japan
[5] ARIAKE Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol Surg, Gastroenterol Ctr, Ariake, Japan
[6] Osaka Red Cross Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol Surg, Osaka, Japan
[7] Fukuyama Municipal Hosp, Dept Surg, Fukuyama, Hiroshima, Japan
[8] Kitasato Univ, Dept Surg, Sch Med, Tokyo, Japan
[9] Nishi Kobe Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
关键词
COLON-CANCER; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; BOWEL RESECTION; OPEN COLECTOMY; SURGERY; CHEMOTHERAPY; METASTASES; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824a99e4
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To investigate the hypothesis that laparoscopic primary tumor resection is safe and effective when compared with the open approach for colorectal cancer patients with incurable metastases. Background: There are only a few reports with small numbers of patients on laparoscopic tumor resection for stage IV colorectal cancer. Methods: Data from consecutive patients who underwent palliative primary tumor resection for stage IV colorectal cancer between January 2006 and December 2007 were collected retrospectively from 41 institutions. Short-and long-term outcomes were compared between patients who underwent laparoscopic or open resection. Results: A total of 904 patients (laparoscopic group: 226, open group: 678) with a median age of 64 years (range: 22-95) were included in the analysis. Conversion was required in 28 patients (12.4%) and the most common reasons for conversion (23/28: 82%) were bulky or invasive tumors. There was no 30-day postoperative mortality in either group. The complication rate (NCI-CTCAE grade 2-4) after laparoscopic surgery (17%) was significantly lower than that after open surgery (24%) (P = 0.02), and the difference was greater (4% vs 12%; P < 0.001) when we limited the analysis to severe (>= grade 3) complications. The median length of postoperative hospital stay in the laparoscopic group was significantly shorter than that in the open group (14 vs 17 days; P = 0.002). In univariate analysis, overall survival for the laparoscopic group was significantly better than that for open surgery (median survival time: 25.9 vs 22.3 months, P = 0.04), although no difference was apparent in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Compared with open surgery, laparoscopic primary tumor resection has advantages in the short term and no disadvantages in the long term. It is a reasonable treatment option for certain stage IV colorectal cancer patients with incurable disease. (Ann Surg 2012; 255: 929-934)
引用
收藏
页码:929 / 934
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology - Breast Cancer
[2]   Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer:: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial [J].
Bonjer, HJ ;
Haglind, E ;
Jeekel, I ;
Kazemier, G ;
Páhlman, L ;
Hop, WCJ ;
Veldkamp, R ;
Kuhry, E ;
Haglind, E ;
Pahlman, L ;
Cuesta, MA ;
Msika, S ;
Morino, M ;
Lacy, A ;
Jeekel, I .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2005, 6 (07) :477-484
[3]   Surgical resection of primary tumors in patients who present with stage IV colorectal cancer: An analysis of surveillance, epidemiology, and end results data, 1988 to 2000 [J].
Cook, AD ;
Single, R ;
McCahill, LE .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 12 (08) :637-645
[4]   Laparoscopic surgery for stage IV colorectal cancer [J].
Fukunaga, Yosuke ;
Higashino, Masayuki ;
Tanimura, Shinnya ;
Takemura, Masashi ;
Fujiwara, Yushi ;
Osugi, Harushi .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (06) :1353-1359
[5]   Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial [J].
Guillou, PJ ;
Quirke, P ;
Thorpe, H ;
Walker, J ;
Jayne, DG ;
Smith, AMH ;
Heath, RM ;
Brown, JM .
LANCET, 2005, 365 (9472) :1718-1726
[6]   A multicenter study on laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in Japan [J].
Kitano, S. ;
Kitajima, M. ;
Konishi, F. ;
Kondo, H. ;
Satomi, S. ;
Shimizu, N. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2006, 20 (09) :1348-1352
[7]   Validation and Clinical Use of the Japanese Classification of Colorectal Carcinomatosis: Benefit of Surgical Cytoreduction Even without Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy [J].
Kobayashi, Hirotoshi ;
Enomoto, Masayuki ;
Higuchi, Tetsuro ;
Uetake, Hiroyuki ;
Iida, Satoru ;
Ishikawa, Toshiaki ;
Ishiguro, Megumi ;
Sugihara, Kenichi .
DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 27 (06) :473-480
[8]   Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer:: a randomised trial [J].
Lacy, AM ;
García-Valdecasas, JC ;
Delgado, S ;
Castells, A ;
Taurá, P ;
Piqué, JM ;
Visa, J .
LANCET, 2002, 359 (9325) :2224-2229
[9]   Laparoscopic bowel resection in the setting of metastatic colorectal cancer [J].
Law, Wai Lun ;
Fan, Facs Joe K. M. ;
Poon, Jensen T. C. ;
Choi, Hok Kwok ;
Lo, Oswens S. H. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 15 (05) :1424-1428
[10]  
Mella J, 1997, ANN ROY COLL SURG, V79, P206