How Students Think about Experimental Design: Novel Conceptions Revealed by in-Class Activities

被引:40
作者
Brownell, Sara E. [1 ]
Wenderoth, Mary Pat [1 ]
Theobald, Roddy [1 ]
Okoroafor, Nnadozie [1 ]
Koval, Mikhail [1 ]
Freeman, Scott [1 ]
Walcher-Chevillet, Cristina L. [2 ]
Crowe, Alison J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Puget Sound, Tacoma, WA 98416 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
experimental design; education; learning progression; active learning; large lecture; BIOLOGY; PRECONCEPTIONS; MISCONCEPTIONS; INSTRUCTION; ENGAGEMENT; VARIABLES; GENETICS;
D O I
10.1093/biosci/bit016
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Experimental design is a fundamental skill for scientists, but it is often not explicitly taught in large introductory biology classes. We have designed two pencil-and-paper in-class activities to increase student understanding of experimental design: an analyze activity, in which students are asked to evaluate data, and a design activity, in which students are asked to propose a novel experiment. We found that students who completed the design activity but not the analyze activity performed significantly better on the Expanded Experimental Design Ability Tool (E-EDAT) than did students who attended a didactic lecture about experimental design. By using grounded theory on student responses on the in-class activities, we have identified a novel set of accurate and inaccurate conceptions focused on two aspects of experimental design: sample size and the repetition of experiments. These findings can be used to help guide science majors through mastering the fundamental skill of designing rigorous experiments.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 137
页数:13
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Alonzo A.C., 2012, Learning progressions in science: Current challenges and future directions
  • [2] Active Learning Not Associated with Student Learning in a Random Sample of College Biology Courses
    Andrews, T. M.
    Leonard, M. J.
    Colgrove, C. A.
    Kalinowski, S. T.
    [J]. CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2011, 10 (04): : 394 - 405
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, EVOL OUTREACH, DOI DOI 10.1186/1936-6434-6-13
  • [4] Beichner R.J., 2007, Research-Based Reform of University Physics, V1, P2
  • [5] Bloom S., 1956, Taxonomy of educational objectives
  • [6] Student understanding of control of variables: Deciding whether or not a variable influences the behavior of a system
    Boudreaux, Andrew
    Shaffer, Peter S.
    Heron, Paula R. L.
    McDermott, Lillian C.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2008, 76 (02) : 163 - 170
  • [7] Brewer C. A., 2011, VIS CHANG UND BIOL E
  • [8] All other things being equal: Acquisition and transfer of the control of variables strategy
    Chen, Z
    Klahr, D
    [J]. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1999, 70 (05) : 1098 - 1120
  • [9] NOT ALL PRECONCEPTIONS ARE MISCONCEPTIONS - FINDING ANCHORING CONCEPTIONS FOR GROUNDING INSTRUCTION ON STUDENTS INTUITIONS
    CLEMENT, J
    BROWN, DE
    ZIETSMAN, A
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 1989, 11 (05) : 554 - 565
  • [10] Teaching the Process of Science: Faculty Perceptions and an Effective Methodology
    Coil, David
    Wenderoth, Mary Pat
    Cunningham, Matthew
    Dirks, Clarissa
    [J]. CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2010, 9 (04): : 524 - 535