Evaluation of the cost of CA-125 measurement, physical exam, and imaging in the diagnosis of recurrent ovarian cancer

被引:24
|
作者
Armstrong, Amy [1 ]
Otvos, Balint [2 ]
Singh, Sareena [3 ]
Debernardo, Robert [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Case Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Case Western Reserve Sch Med, Cleveland, OH USA
[3] Univ Hosp Case Med Ctr, Seidman Canc Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
Ovarian cancer; Surveillance; Cost; SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURES; CHEMOTHERAPY; CISPLATIN; SURGERY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.09.017
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. Ovarian cancer accounts for 50% of deaths from gynecologic malignancies. We sought to determine the cost of common methods of surveillance of women with ovarian cancer in first clinical remission. The current standard for post treatment surveillance is the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Methods. We retrospectively determined how recurrence was initially detected at our institution and a cost model was created and applied to the United States population to calculate surveillance costs using the Surveillance Epidemiology & End Results (SEER) database. Results. 57% (n = 60) of first recurrences were identified by increasing CA 125 level. Routine office visit identified 27% (n = 29) of recurrences, and 15% (n = 16) were diagnosed initially with CT scan. In 5% (5/105), CT abnormality was the only finding. 95% (100/105) of patients had either elevated CA 125 or office visit findings at time of recurrence. Of the 22,000 women diagnosed with ovarian cancer yearly, 60% (n = 13,266) will have advanced disease and are likely to recur. The surveillance cost for this population for 2 years using our model is $32,500,000 using NCCN guidelines and $58,000,000 if one CT scan is obtained. Conclusions. Our data suggests that following NCCN guidelines will detect 95% of recurrences. An additional $26 million will be needed to identify the 5% of women with recurrence seen on CT only. Post treatment surveillance of ovarian cancer patients contributes significantly to health care costs. Use of CT scan to follow these patients largely increases cost with only a small increase in recurrence detection. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:503 / 507
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SCREENING FOR OVARIAN-CANCER BY CA-125 MEASUREMENT
    JACOBS, I
    LANCET, 1988, 1 (8590): : 889 - 889
  • [2] SCREENING FOR OVARIAN-CANCER BY CA-125 MEASUREMENT
    CRUICKSHANK, DJ
    LANCET, 1988, 1 (8584): : 540 - 541
  • [3] Omentin as an adjunct to CA-125 in detecting recurrent ovarian cancer
    Lewis, Kelsey
    Yeung, Chi Lam Au
    Mok, Samuel
    Lu, Karen
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 77
  • [4] CA-125 criteria for response evaluation in ovarian cancer
    Sundar, S
    O'byrne, KJ
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2005, 98 (03) : 520 - 521
  • [5] EVALUATION OF CA-125 AS A MARKER IN OVARIAN-CANCER
    DUFFY, MJ
    DAVIS, MA
    SHEEHAN, J
    FENNELLY, JJ
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 1988, 34 (06) : 1293 - 1293
  • [6] CA-125 PROSPECTS IN EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF OVARIAN-CANCER
    EINHORN, N
    TUMOUR BIOLOGY, 1986, 7 (04): : 297 - 297
  • [7] Evaluation of HE4 and TTR for diagnosis of ovarian cancer: Comparison with CA-125
    Zheng, Xin
    Chen, Shulin
    Li, Linfang
    Liu, Xiaohua
    Liu, Xiaomin
    Dai, Shuqin
    Zhang, Peng
    Lu, Huaiwu
    Lin, Zhongqiu
    Yu, Yuefei
    Li, Guorong
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2018, 47 (06) : 227 - 230
  • [8] CA-125 IN OVARIAN-CANCER
    VANDERBURG, MEL
    LAMMES, FB
    VERWEIJ, J
    NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 40 (1-2): : 36 - 51
  • [9] Longitudinal evaluation of CA-125 velocity and prediction of ovarian cancer
    Xu, Jian-Lun
    Commins, John
    Partridge, Edward
    Riley, Thomas L.
    Prorok, Philip C.
    Johnson, Christine C.
    Buys, Saundra S.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 125 (01) : 70 - 74
  • [10] PREOPERATIVE MEASUREMENT OF CANCER ANTIGEN-125 (CA-125) IN THE DIFFERENTIAL-DIAGNOSIS OF OVARIAN-TUMORS
    MOGENSEN, O
    MOGENSEN, B
    JAKOBSEN, A
    SELL, A
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 1989, 28 (04) : 471 - 473