Modeling trade-offs among ecosystem services in agricultural production systems

被引:69
作者
Balbi, Stefano [1 ]
del Prado, Agustin [1 ]
Gallejones, Patricia [1 ]
Geevan, Chandanathil Pappachan [2 ]
Pardo, Guillermo [1 ]
Perez-Minana, Elena [1 ]
Manrique, Rosa [3 ]
Hernandez-Santiago, Cuitlahuac [4 ]
Villa, Ferdinando [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Basque Ctr Climate Change, Bilbao, Spain
[2] Ctr Environm & Social Concerns, Ahmadabad 380015, Gujarat, India
[3] Univ Bologna, Dept Agr Sci, I-40127 Bologna, Italy
[4] Univ Mar, Puerto Angel 70902, Oaxaca, Mexico
[5] Basque Fdn Sci, Ikerbasque, Barcelona, Spain
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Agricultural systems; Ecosystem services; Trade-offs; Food provision; Model integration; BAYESIAN BELIEF NETWORKS; GAS MITIGATION OPTIONS; DECISION-MAKING; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CONSERVATION; FRAMEWORK; SUPPORT; POLICY; CARBON; INTEGRATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.12.017
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Although agricultural ecosystems can provide humans with a wide set of benefits agricultural production system management is mainly driven by food production. As a consequence, a need to ensure food security globally has been accompanied by a significant decline in the state of ecosystems. In order to reduce negative trade-offs and identify potential synergies it is necessary to improve our understanding of the relationships between various ecosystem services (ES) as well as the impacts of farm management on ES provision. We present a spatially explicit application that captures and quantifies ES trade-offs in the crop systems of Llanada Alavesa in the Basque Country. Our analysis presents a quantitative assessment of selected ES including crop yield, water supply and quality, climate regulation and air quality. The study is conducted using semantic meta-modeling, a technique that enables flexible integration of models to overcome the service-by-service modeling approach applied traditionally in ES assessment. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:314 / 326
页数:13
相关论文
共 112 条
[91]  
Simmhan YL, 2005, SIGMOD REC, V34, P31, DOI 10.1145/1084805.1084812
[92]   Potential for carbon sequestration in European soils: Preliminary estimates for five scenarios using results from long-term experiments [J].
Smith, P ;
Powlson, DS ;
Glendining, MJ ;
Smith, JU .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 1997, 3 (01) :67-79
[93]   Policy and technological constraints to implementation of greenhouse gas mitigation options in agriculture [J].
Smith, Pete ;
Martino, Daniel ;
Cai, Zucong ;
Gwary, Daniel ;
Janzen, Henry ;
Kumar, Pushpam ;
McCarl, Bruce ;
Ogle, Stephen ;
O'Mara, Frank ;
Rice, Charles ;
Scholes, Bob ;
Sirotenko, Oleg ;
Howden, Mark ;
McAllister, Tim ;
Pan, Genxing ;
Romanenkov, Vladimir ;
Schneider, Uwe ;
Towprayoon, Sirintornthep .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 118 (1-4) :6-28
[94]  
Steinfeld H., 2006, Renewable Resources Journal, V24, P15
[95]  
Stocker TF, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2013: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P1, DOI 10.1017/cbo9781107415324
[96]   A framework for modeling payments for ecosystem services with agent-based models, Bayesian belief networks and opinion dynamics models [J].
Sun, Zhanli ;
Mueller, Daniel .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2013, 45 :15-28
[97]  
Sutton M. A., 2013, Our Nutrient World. The Challenge to Produce More Food & Energy with Less Pollution
[98]   Ecosystem services and agriculture: Cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits [J].
Swinton, Scott M. ;
Lupi, Frank ;
Robertson, G. Philip ;
Hamilton, Stephen K. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 64 (02) :245-252
[99]   An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development [J].
Tallis, Heather ;
Kareiva, Peter ;
Marvier, Michelle ;
Chang, Amy .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (28) :9457-9464
[100]   Mapping and Valuing Ecosystem Services as an Approach for Conservation and Natural-Resource Management [J].
Tallis, Heather ;
Polasky, Stephen .
YEAR IN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2009, 2009, 1162 :265-283