Business Students' Experience with Peer Grading

被引:0
|
作者
Florjancic, Viktorija [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Primorska, Fac Management, Cankarjeva 5, Koper 6000, Slovenia
来源
LEARNING TECHNOLOGY FOR EDUCATION CHALLENGES, LTEC 2018 | 2018年 / 870卷
关键词
Peer grading; Higher education; Assessment;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-95522-3_9
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Implementing peer grading in a business study programme presents a challenge for teachers and students, especially at universities where peer grading still presents un unusual and unknown pedagogical approach. The whole process must be well-planned in advance, and the assessment criteria must be clear, defined, and understandable. In addition, students need to develop assessment literacy. Increased interest for an elective course forced us to think about maintaining all students' interactions that had been developed in the previous years without compromising learning outcomes achievements and the course quality. Peer grading/assessment was gradually implemented. Despite the larger and heterogeneous group, the students qualified for peer evaluation and met the course learning outcomes without any problems. The use of peer assessment had several advantages, including that the students worked more and harder than in other "traditional" courses. It was evident that students were learning through this peer assessment process, which gave their studies additional depth. Students left the course with a positive learning experience that might be used in other learning circumstances.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 104
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] How Effective Can Simple Ordinal Peer Grading Be?
    Caragiannis, Ioannis
    Krimpas, George A.
    Voudouris, Alexandros A.
    EC'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 ACM CONFERENCE ON ECONOMICS AND COMPUTATION, 2016, : 323 - 340
  • [22] RankwithTA: A robust and Accurate Peer Grading Mechanism for MOOCs
    Fang, Hui
    Wang, Yufeng
    Jin, Qun
    Ma, Jianhua
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2017 IEEE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TEACHING, ASSESSMENT, AND LEARNING FOR ENGINEERING (TALE), 2017, : 497 - 502
  • [23] Supporting Team Submissions and Peer Grading within Submitty
    Cutler, Barbara
    Peveler, Matthew
    Breese, Samuel
    Maicus, Evan
    Milanova, Ana
    Holzbauer, Buster
    Aikens, Andrew
    Anderson, James
    Barthelmess, Josh
    Cyrus, Timothy
    Lee, Marissa
    Montealegre, Leon
    Wang, Jessica
    SIGCSE'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 49TH ACM TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2018, : 1111 - 1111
  • [24] Human-Machine Hybrid Peer Grading in SPOCs
    Han, Yong
    Wu, Wenjun
    Yan, Yitao
    Zhang, Lijun
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 220922 - 220934
  • [25] Learning environments’ influence on students’ learning experience in an Australian Faculty of Business and Economics
    Lisiane Closs
    Marian Mahat
    Wesley Imms
    Learning Environments Research, 2022, 25 : 271 - 285
  • [26] Learning environments' influence on students' learning experience in an Australian Faculty of Business and Economics
    Closs, Lisiane
    Mahat, Marian
    Imms, Wesley
    LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH, 2022, 25 (01) : 271 - 285
  • [27] Dual-evaluation with formative peer-assessment by rubrics: A teaching experience in Business and Economics studies
    Abad, Pilar
    Robles, M-Dolores
    5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HIGHER EDUCATION ADVANCES (HEAD'19), 2019, : 37 - 45
  • [28] In the eye of the beholder: The relationship between perceived peer language skills, provided peer feedback and peer grading in secondary education
    Aben, Jochem E. J.
    Timmermans, Anneke C.
    Dingyloudi, Filitsa
    Strijbos, Jan -Willem
    STUDIES IN EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION, 2023, 77
  • [29] Impact of a metaverse experience based on peer-facilitated learning on the sustainable education of university students
    Cheng, Shu-Chen
    INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2025,
  • [30] Students' experience of making and receiving peer assessment: the effect of self-assessed knowledge and trust
    Carlsson Hauff, Jeanette
    Nilsson, Jonas
    ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2022, 47 (06) : 959 - 971