Business Students' Experience with Peer Grading

被引:0
|
作者
Florjancic, Viktorija [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Primorska, Fac Management, Cankarjeva 5, Koper 6000, Slovenia
来源
LEARNING TECHNOLOGY FOR EDUCATION CHALLENGES, LTEC 2018 | 2018年 / 870卷
关键词
Peer grading; Higher education; Assessment;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-95522-3_9
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Implementing peer grading in a business study programme presents a challenge for teachers and students, especially at universities where peer grading still presents un unusual and unknown pedagogical approach. The whole process must be well-planned in advance, and the assessment criteria must be clear, defined, and understandable. In addition, students need to develop assessment literacy. Increased interest for an elective course forced us to think about maintaining all students' interactions that had been developed in the previous years without compromising learning outcomes achievements and the course quality. Peer grading/assessment was gradually implemented. Despite the larger and heterogeneous group, the students qualified for peer evaluation and met the course learning outcomes without any problems. The use of peer assessment had several advantages, including that the students worked more and harder than in other "traditional" courses. It was evident that students were learning through this peer assessment process, which gave their studies additional depth. Students left the course with a positive learning experience that might be used in other learning circumstances.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 104
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Grading 600+students: A Case Study on Peer and Self Grading
    Aniche, Mauricio
    Mulder, Frank
    Hermans, Felienne
    2021 IEEE/ACM 43RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING: JOINT TRACK ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING EDUCATION AND TRAINING (ICSE-JSEET 2021), 2021, : 211 - 220
  • [2] Peer Grading Without Protest:The SPARK Approach to Summative Peer Assessment
    Kay, Jennifer S.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 53RD ACM TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION (SIGCSE 2022), VOL 1, 2022, : 119 - 125
  • [3] Peer assessment among business students
    Florjancic, Viktorija
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEARNING TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 15 (01) : 4 - 25
  • [4] Implementation and Experience of the Online Peer Grading System for Our Real Class
    Noguchi, Shunsuke
    Fujimura, Naomi
    SIGUCCS'15: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 ACM ANNUAL CONFERENCE, 2015, : 125 - 128
  • [5] An empirical review of anonymity effects in peer assessment, peer feedback, peer review, peer evaluation and peer grading
    Panadero, Ernesto
    Alqassab, Maryam
    ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (08) : 1253 - 1278
  • [6] A supervised method for unbiased peer-to-peer evaluation. An experience with engineering students
    Simois Francisco, J.
    MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL FOR EDUCATION SOCIAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 2 (02): : 65 - 78
  • [7] Improving Peer Grading Reliability with Graph Mining Techniques
    Capuano, Nicola
    Caballe, Santi
    Miguel, Jorge
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN LEARNING, 2016, 11 (07): : 24 - 33
  • [8] Methods for Ordinal Peer Grading
    Raman, Karthik
    Joachims, Thorsten
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING (KDD'14), 2014, : 1037 - 1046
  • [9] Students' Expectations of Teaching: the Business, Accounting and Economics Experience
    Handal, Boris
    Wood, Leigh
    Muchatuta, Michelle
    E-JOURNAL OF BUSINESS EDUCATION & SCHOLARSHIP OF TEACHING, 2011, 5 (01): : 1 - 17
  • [10] Peer- and Self-Grading Compared to Faculty Grading
    Wagner, Mary L.
    Suh, Dong Churl
    Cruz, Sandy
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2011, 75 (07)