Biophysical Modeling to Determine the Optimization of Left Ventricular Pacing Site and AV/VV Delays in the Acute and Chronic Phase of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

被引:21
作者
Lee, Angela W. C. [1 ]
Crozier, Andrew [2 ]
Hyde, Eoin R. [1 ]
Lamata, Pablo [1 ]
Truong, Michael [1 ]
Sohal, Manav [1 ]
Jackson, Thomas [1 ]
Behar, Jonathan M. [1 ]
Claridge, Simon [1 ]
Shetty, Anoop [1 ]
Sammut, Eva [1 ]
Plank, Gernot [2 ]
Rinaldi, Christopher Aldo [1 ,3 ]
Niederer, Steven [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Div Imaging Sci & Biomed Engn, London, England
[2] Med Univ Graz, Inst Biophys, Graz, Austria
[3] Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, Cardiovasc Dept, London, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
atrioventricular delay; cardiac resynchronization therapy; computer modeling/simulations; interventricular delay; left bundle branch block; left ventricular lead placement; ACUTE HEMODYNAMIC-RESPONSE; HEART-FAILURE; LEAD POSITION; IMPROVEMENT; STIMULATION; MULTISITE; SURVIVAL; IMPACT; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1111/jce.13134
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Device Optimization for Acute and Chronic CRT. Background: Cardiac anatomy and function adapt in response to chronic cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The effects of these changes on the optimal left ventricle (LV) lead location and timing delay settings have yet to be fully explored. Objective: To predict the effects of chronic CRT on the optimal LV lead location and device timing settings over time. Methods: Biophysical computational cardiac models were generated for 3 patients, immediately post-implant (ACUTE) and after at least 6 months of CRT (CHRONIC). Optimal LV pacing area and device settings were predicted by pacing the ACUTE and CHRONIC models across the LV epicardium (49 sites each) with a range of 9 pacing settings and simulating the acute hemodynamic response (AHR) of the heart. Results: There were statistically significant differences between the distribution of the AHR in the ACUTE and CHRONIC models (P < 0.0005 in all cases). The site delivering the maximal AHR shifted location between the ACUTE and CHRONIC models but provided a negligible improvement (<2%). The majority of the acute optimal LV pacing regions (76-100%) and device settings (76-91%) remained optimal chronically. Conclusion: Optimization of the LV pacing location and device settings were important at the time of implant, with a reduced benefit over time, where the majority of the acute optimal LV pacing region and device settings remained optimal with chronic CRT.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 215
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [11] Three-dimensional mapping of optimal left ventricular pacing site for cardiac resynchronization
    Helm, Robert H.
    Byrne, Melissa
    Helm, Patrick A.
    Daya, Samantapudi K.
    Osman, Nael F.
    Tunin, Richard
    Halperin, Henry R.
    Berger, Ronald D.
    Kass, David A.
    Lardo, Albert C.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2007, 115 (08) : 953 - 961
  • [12] Impact of VV optimization in relation to left ventricular lead position: an acute haemodynamic study
    Khan, Fakhar Z.
    Virdee, Munmohan S.
    Read, Philip A.
    Pugh, Peter J.
    Begley, David
    Fynn, Simon P.
    Dutka, David P.
    [J]. EUROPACE, 2011, 13 (06): : 845 - 852
  • [13] Left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy: where and how?
    Khan, Fakhar Zaman
    Virdee, Munmohan Singh
    Fynn, Simon Patrick
    Dutka, David Paul
    [J]. EUROPACE, 2009, 11 (05): : 554 - 561
  • [14] The interaction of interventricular pacing intervals and left ventricular lead position during temporary biventricular pacing evaluated by tissue Doppler imaging
    Lane, R. E.
    Chow, A. W. C.
    Mayet, J.
    Francis, D. P.
    Peters, N. S.
    Schilling, R. J.
    Davies, D. W.
    [J]. HEART, 2007, 93 (11) : 1426 - 1432
  • [15] Long-term impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy in mild heart failure: 5-year results from the REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic left vEntricular dysfunction (REVERSE) study
    Linde, Cecilia
    Gold, Michael R.
    Abraham, William T.
    Sutton, Martin St John
    Ghio, Stefano
    Cerkvenik, Jeff
    Daubert, Claude
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (33) : 2592 - 2599
  • [16] Insights From a Cardiac Resynchronization Optimization Clinic as Part of a Heart Failure Disease Management Program
    Mullens, Wilfried
    Grimm, Richard A.
    Verga, Tanya
    Dresing, Thomas
    Starling, Randall C.
    Wilkoff, Bruce L.
    Tang, W. H. Wilson
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 53 (09) : 765 - 773
  • [17] Simulating human cardiac electrophysiology on clinical time-scales
    Niederer, Steven
    Mitchell, Lawrence
    Smith, Nicolas
    Plank, Gernot
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 2
  • [18] Length-dependent tension in the failing heart and the efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Niederer, Steven A.
    Plank, Gernot
    Chinchapatnam, Phani
    Ginks, Matthew
    Lamata, Pablo
    Rhode, Kawal S.
    Rinaldi, Christopher A.
    Razavi, Reza
    Smith, Nicolas P.
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH, 2011, 89 (02) : 336 - 343
  • [19] A Pilot Study Assessing ECG versus ECHO Ventriculoventricular Optimization in Pediatric Resynchronization Patients
    Punn, Rajesh
    Hanisch, Debra
    Motonaga, Kara S.
    Rosenthal, David N.
    Ceresnak, Scott R.
    Dubin, Anne M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 27 (02) : 210 - 216
  • [20] Improvement in acute contractility and hemodynamics with multipoint pacing via a left ventricular quadripolar pacing lead
    Rinaldi, C. Aldo
    Leclercq, Christophe
    Kranig, Wolfgang
    Kacet, Salem
    Betts, Tim
    Bordachar, Pierre
    Gutleben, Klaus-Juergen
    Shetty, Anoop
    Donal, Erwan
    Keel, Allen
    Ryu, Kyungmoo
    Farazi, Taraneh G.
    Simon, Marcus
    Naqvi, Tasneem Z.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 40 (01) : 75 - 80