Clinical efficacy of nano-hydroxyapatite in dentin hypersensitivity: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:37
作者
Alencar, Cristiane de Melo [1 ]
Freitas de Paula, Brennda Lucy [1 ]
Guanipa Ortiz, Mariangela Ivette [1 ]
Magno, Marcela Barauna [2 ]
Silva, Cecy Martins [1 ]
Maia, Lucianne Cople [2 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Para, Sch Dent, Augusto Correa St 1, BR-66075110 Belem, PA, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Sch Dent, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
关键词
Dentin hypersensitivity; Desensitizing agents; Meta-analysis; Clinical trials; SENSITIVITY; TOOTHPASTE; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2018.12.014
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the desensitizing effect of nano-hydroxyapatite (n-HAP) on dentine hypersensitivity (DH). Sources: Seven electronic databases were searched on April 27, 2018. Study selection: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included based on the PICO strategy: Participants - Humans with DH; Intervention - n-HAP-containing desensitizing; Comparison - n-HAP-free treatments or placebo/negative control; and Outcomes - relief of DH. The risk of bias was classified by the Cochrane guidelines. Five meta-analyses were performed to evaluate the efficacy of n-HAP with regard to pain assessment stimuli (primary outcome); comparison of n-HAP with other treatments or placebo/negative control, and effectiveness of at-home and in-office n-HAP use (secondary outcomes). The quality of the evidence was evaluated using the GRADE. Data: Six RCTs with 4 weeks of follow-up were included in the meta-analysis. For the primary outcome, n-HAP showed a better desensitizing effect for evaporative stimuli (SMD -1.09 [-1.24, -0.94], p < 0.00001) and tactile stimuli (SMD -0.93 [-1.42, -0.43]) than other treatments (p = 0.0002). However, there was no difference between n-HAP and other treatments for the cold stimuli (SMD -0.17 [-0.81, 0.48], p = 0.61). In an overall analysis, n-HAP-containing treatment showing the most significant desensitizing effect (SMD -0.93 [-1.19, -0.68], p < 0.00001) with a high quality of evidence for pooled results. In the secondary outcomes, n-HAP showed the best effect in the overall analysis (p < 0.05) with moderate quality evidence. Conclusions: The n-HAP-containing treatment showed better clinical performance than other treatments for DH relief. However, long-term follow-up RCTs are required in the future before definitive recommendations can be made. Clinical significance: Dentin hypersensitivity is a common global condition and its multifactorial etiology has led to the development of several treatments. The n-HAP-containing treatment showed greater DH relief when compared to other desensitizing agents, placebo or negative control.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 21
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Anand Suresh, 2017, Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove), V60, P114, DOI 10.14712/18059694.2018.3
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, COCHRANE CONSUMERS C
[3]  
[Anonymous], STAT MED
[4]  
[Anonymous], SENSORY MECH DENTINE
[5]   Desensitizing toothpaste versus placebo for dentin hypersensitivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Bae, Ji-Hyun ;
Kim, Young-Kyun ;
Myung, Seung-Kwon .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2015, 42 (02) :131-141
[6]   What is known about the influence of dentine hypersensitivity on oral health-related quality of life? [J].
Bekes, Katrin ;
Hirsch, Christian .
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2013, 17 :S45-S51
[7]  
BEVILACQUA Flávia Magnani, 2016, Rev. odontol. UNESP, V45, P127, DOI 10.1590/1807-2577.24115
[8]   SENSITIVITY OF DENTINE [J].
BRANNSTROM, M .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 1966, 21 (04) :517-+
[9]  
Brannstrom M, 1965, Odontol Revy, V16, P293
[10]  
Brannstrom M, 1967, Caries Res, V1, P310