Facilitating Safety and Security Co-design and Formal Analysis in Multi-layered System Modeling

被引:0
作者
Quamara, Megha [1 ,2 ]
Pedroza, Gabriel [1 ]
Hamid, Brahim [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Saclay, CEA, List, F-91120 Palaiseau, France
[2] Univ Toulouse, IRIT, CNRS, UT2, 118 Route Narbonne, F-31062 Toulouse 9, France
来源
2022 IEEE INTL CONF ON DEPENDABLE, AUTONOMIC AND SECURE COMPUTING, INTL CONF ON PERVASIVE INTELLIGENCE AND COMPUTING, INTL CONF ON CLOUD AND BIG DATA COMPUTING, INTL CONF ON CYBER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CONGRESS (DASC/PICOM/CBDCOM/CYBERSCITECH) | 2022年
关键词
safety; security; co-engineering; design; analysis; model-driven engineering; formal methods;
D O I
10.1109/DASC/PiCom/CBDCom/Cy55231.2022.9927773
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The engineering process of systems deployed in critical domains (e.g., automotive) advocates for early-stage integrated analysis of safety and security concerns, given their mutual influence. Specifically, in the design phase, safety and security requirements undergo a transition to the system architectural design across different granular and conceptual representations. However, such an enrichment process is often complex and lacks preliminary guidance to consistently break down high-level system specifications and requirements into intricate architecture and deployment. In particular, engineers require further support to interpret diverse system, safety, and security expertise and facilitate the consistent passage of knowledge pertaining to these disciplines for automated analysis. To this end, we propose an approach to facilitate the joint design and formal analysis of system safety and security concerns. Notably, the approach aims for a three-layered system modeling, integrating mission, functional and component views, and also, reusable libraries of pre-defined safety and security properties, specialize-able across them. We couple the Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) paradigm and Formal Methods (FM) for the hierarchical-precise modeling, formal interpretation, and verification of model views w.r.t. the desired properties. The accompanying tool-chain support for approach instantiation builds upon Papyrus as a modeling framework and Rodin as a formal-based tool for verification. The proposed approach is illustrated via a Connected-Driving Vehicles (CDVs) use case.
引用
收藏
页码:242 / 249
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Rodin: An open toolset for modelling and reasoning in Event-B
    Abrial J.-R.
    Butler M.
    Hallerstede S.
    Hoang T.S.
    Mehta F.
    Voisin L.
    [J]. International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 2010, 12 (06) : 447 - 466
  • [2] A Comparative Analysis of Network Dependability, Fault-tolerance, Reliability, Security, and Survivability
    Al-Kuwaiti, M.
    Kyriakopoulos, N.
    Hussein, S.
    [J]. IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS AND TUTORIALS, 2009, 11 (02): : 106 - 124
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2018, 262621 ISO
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2018, ISO/IEC 27000
  • [5] On the semantics of communications when verifying equivalence properties
    Babel, Kushal
    Cheval, Vincent
    Kremer, Steve
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SECURITY, 2020, 28 (01) : 71 - 127
  • [6] CEA, 2021, ECL PAP MOD ENV
  • [7] Autonomous Vehicle: Security by Design
    Chattopadhyay, Anupam
    Lam, Kwok-Yan
    Tavva, Yaswanth
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2021, 22 (11) : 7015 - 7029
  • [8] Systems of systems: From mission definition to architecture description
    Cherfa, Imane
    Belloir, Nicolas
    Sadou, Salah
    Fleurquin, Regis
    Bennouar, Djamal
    [J]. SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2019, 22 (06) : 437 - 454
  • [9] GOAL-DIRECTED REQUIREMENTS ACQUISITION
    DARDENNE, A
    VANLAMSWEERDE, A
    FICKAS, S
    [J]. SCIENCE OF COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, 1993, 20 (1-2) : 3 - 50
  • [10] Integration of safety analysis in model-driven software development
    de Miguel, M. A.
    Briones, J. F.
    Silva, J. P.
    Alonso, A.
    [J]. IET SOFTWARE, 2008, 2 (03) : 260 - 280