A comparative study of the evolutionary many-objective algorithms

被引:8
|
作者
Zhao, Haitong [1 ]
Zhang, Changsheng [1 ]
Ning, Jiaxu [2 ]
Zhang, Bin [1 ]
Sun, Peng [3 ]
Feng, Yunfei [4 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Engn, Shenyang 110819, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[2] Shenyang Ligong Univ, Sch Informat Sci & Engn, Shenyang, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[3] Iowa State Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Ames, IA 50010 USA
[4] Sams Club Technol Wal Mart Inc, Bentonville, AR 72712 USA
关键词
Evolutionary algorithm; Meta-heuristic algorithm; Many-objective problem; Many-objective optimization; REFERENCE POINTS; NSGA-II; OPTIMIZATION; DECOMPOSITION; DIVERSITY; DOMINANCE; CONVERGENCE; OPTIMALITY; REDUCTION; INDICATOR;
D O I
10.1007/s13748-019-00174-2
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The many-objective optimization problem (MaOP) is widespread in real life. It contains multiple conflicting objectives to be optimized. Many evolutionary many-objective (EMaO) algorithms are proposed and developed to solve it. The EMaO algorithms have received extensive attentions and in-depth studies. At the beginning of this paper, the challenges of designing EMaO algorithms are first summarized. Based on the optimization strategies, the existing EMaO algorithms are classified. Characteristics of each class of algorithms are interpreted and compared in detail. Their applicability for different types of MaOPs is discussed. Next, the numerical experiment was implemented to test the performance of typical EMaO algorithms. Their performance is analyzed from the perspectives of solution quality, convergence speed and the approximation of the Pareto front. Performance of different algorithms on different kind of test cases is analyzed, respectively. At last, the researching statuses of existing algorithms are summarized. The future researching directions of the EMaO algorithm are prospected.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 43
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ranking Many-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms Using Performance Metrics Ensemble
    He, Zhenan
    Yen, Gary G.
    2013 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2013, : 2480 - 2487
  • [32] A Survey of Decomposition Based Evolutionary Algorithms for Many-Objective Optimization Problems
    Guo, Xiaofang
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 72825 - 72838
  • [33] Many-objective Evolutionary Algorithms for Multicast Routing with Quality of Service Problem
    de Queiroz Lafeta, Thiago Fialho
    de Paula Bueno, Marcos Luiz
    Soares Brasil, Christiane Regina
    Barbosa de Oliveira, Gina Maira
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2016 5TH BRAZILIAN CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (BRACIS 2016), 2016, : 187 - 192
  • [34] Fuzzy-Based Pareto Optimality for Many-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms
    He, Zhenan
    Yen, Gary G.
    Zhang, Jun
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2014, 18 (02) : 269 - 285
  • [35] Many-Objective evolutionary algorithms for the characteristics of text in the email text categorization
    Zou, J. (zoujuan@xtu.edu.cn), 1600, CESER Publications, Post Box No. 113, Roorkee, 247667, India (44):
  • [36] Near-Tight Runtime Guarantees for Many-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms
    Wietheger, Simon
    Doerr, Benjamin
    PARALLEL PROBLEM SOLVING FROM NATURE-PPSN XVIII, PT IV, PPSN 2024, 2024, 15151 : 153 - 168
  • [37] Big Archive-Assisted Ensemble of Many-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms
    Zhong, Wen
    Xiong, Jian
    Lin, Anping
    Xing, Lining
    Chen, Feilong
    Chen, Yingwu
    COMPLEXITY, 2021, 2021
  • [38] Assessing effectiveness of many-objective evolutionary algorithms for selection of tag SNPs
    Moqa, Rashad
    Younas, Irfan
    Bashir, Maryam
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (12):
  • [39] Clustering Based Parallel Many-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms Using the Shape of the Objective Vectors
    von Luecken, Christian
    Brizuela, Carlos
    Baran, Benjamin
    EVOLUTIONARY MULTI-CRITERION OPTIMIZATION, PT II, 2015, 9019 : 50 - 64
  • [40] Behavior of Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization
    Ishibuchi, Hisao
    Tsukamoto, Noritaka
    Nojima, Yusuke
    2008 UKSIM TENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER MODELING AND SIMULATION, 2008, : 266 - 271