Dosimetric and Radiobiological Comparison of Five Techniques for Postmastectomy Radiotherapy with Simultaneous Integrated Boost

被引:5
作者
Tang, Du [1 ]
Liang, Zhan [1 ]
Guan, Fada [2 ]
Yang, Zhen [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp, Dept Oncol, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Div Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
NORMAL TISSUE; PREMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; BREAST-CANCER; RADIATION; TOMODIRECT; IRRADIATION; TOLERANCE;
D O I
10.1155/2020/9097352
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Purpose. To compare five techniques for the postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB). Materials and Methods. Twenty patients with left-sided breast cancer were retrospectively selected. Five treatment plans were created for each patient: TomoDirect (TD), unblocked helical TomoTherapy (unb-HT), blocked HT (b-HT), hybrid intensity-modulated radiotherapy (hy-IMRT), and fixed-field IMRT (ff-IMRT). A dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions to PTVtotal and 60.2 Gy in 28 fractions to PTVboost were prescribed. The dosimetric parameters for targets and organs at risk (OARs), the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), the second cancer complication probability (SCCP) for OARs, and the treatment efficiency were assessed and compared. Results. TD plans and hy-IMRT plans had similar good dose coverage and homogeneity for both PTVboost and PTVtota (l)and superior dose sparing for the lungs and heart. The ff-IMRT plans had similar dosimetric results for the target volumes compared with the TD and hy-IMRT plans, but gave a relatively higher NTCP and SCCP for the lungs. The unb-HT plans exhibited the highest OAR mean dose, highest NTCP for the lungs (0.97 +/- 1.25 parts per thousand) and heart (4.58 +/- 3.62%), and highest SCCP for the lungs (3.57 +/- 0.05%) and contralateral breast (2.75 +/- 0.29%) among all techniques. The b-HT plans significantly outperformed unb-HT plans with respect to the sparing of the lungs and heart. This technique also showed the best conformity index (0.73 +/- 0.08) for PTVboost and the optimal NTCP for the lungs (0.03 +/- 0.03 parts per thousand) and heart (0.61 +/- 0.73%). Concerning the delivery efficiency, the hy-IMRT and ff-IMRT achieved much higher delivery efficiency compared with TomoTherapy plans. Conclusion. Of the five techniques studied, TD and hy-IMRT are considered the preferable options for PMRT with SIB for left-sided breast cancer treatment and can be routinely applied in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Hippocampus-Sparing Whole-Brain Radiotherapy and Simultaneous Integrated Boost for Multiple Brain Metastases From Lung Adenocarcinoma: Early Response and Dosimetric Evaluation [J].
Kim, Kyung Hwan ;
Cho, Byoung Chul ;
Lee, Chang Geol ;
Kim, Hye Ryun ;
Suh, Yang Gun ;
Kim, Jun Won ;
Choi, Chihwan ;
Baek, Jong Geal ;
Cho, Jaeho .
TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2016, 15 (01) :122-129
[42]   Dosimetric comparison of field in field intensity-modulated radiotherapy technique with conformal radiotherapy techniques in breast cancer [J].
Ercan, Tuelay ;
Igdem, Sefik ;
Alco, Guel ;
Zengin, Funda ;
Atilla, Selin ;
Dincer, Maktav ;
Okkan, Sait .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 28 (04) :283-289
[43]   Comparison of dosimetric parameters of volumetric modulated arc therapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in postmastectomy patients with carcinoma breast [J].
Sudha, Shyama Prem ;
Seenisamy, R. ;
Bharadhwaj, K. .
JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2018, 14 (05) :1005-1009
[44]   Dosimetric comparison of sequential intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and simultaneous integrated boost IMRT for lymph node-positive cervical cancer [J].
Mohanty, Samarpita ;
Hajare, Raghavendra ;
Gurram, Lavanya ;
Aravindakshan, Dheera ;
Midha, Vanisha ;
Chopra, Supriya ;
Mahantshetty, Umesh .
JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2023, 22
[45]   Dosimetric Comparison of Sequential Versus Simultaneous-integrated Boost in Early-stage Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Breast-conserving Surgery [J].
Onal, Cem ;
Efe, Esma ;
Guler, Ozan C. ;
Yildirim, Berna A. .
IN VIVO, 2019, 33 (06) :2181-2189
[46]   Comparison of breast sequential and simultaneous integrated boost using the biologically effective dose volume histogram (BEDVH) [J].
Aly, Moamen M. O. M. ;
Abo-Madyan, Yasser ;
Jahnke, Lennart ;
Wenz, Frederik ;
Glatting, Gerhard .
RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2016, 11
[47]   Dosimetric comparisons of VMAT, IMRT and 3DCRT for locally advanced rectal cancer with simultaneous integrated boost [J].
Zhao, Jun ;
Hu, Weigang ;
Cai, Gang ;
Wang, Jiazhou ;
Xie, Jiang ;
Peng, Jiayuan ;
Zhang, Zhen .
ONCOTARGET, 2016, 7 (05) :6345-6351
[48]   Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) in Nasopharyngeal Cancer [J].
Peponi, Evangelia ;
Glanzmann, Christoph ;
Kunz, Guntram ;
Renner, Christoph ;
Tomuschat, Katja ;
Studer, Gabriela .
STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2010, 186 (03) :135-142
[49]   SIMULTANEOUS INTEGRATED BOOST INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH-GRADE GLIOMAS [J].
Cho, Kwan Ho ;
Kim, Joo-Young ;
Lee, Seung Hoon ;
Yoo, Heon ;
Shin, Sang Hoon ;
Moon, Sung Ho ;
Kim, Tae Hyun ;
Shin, Kyung Hwan ;
Yoon, Myonggeun ;
Lee, Doo-Hyun ;
Pyo, Hong Ryull .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (02) :390-397
[50]   Clinical evaluation of simultaneous integrated boost in brain metastasis patients with helical intensity modulated radiotherapy [J].
Kiziltan, H. S. ;
Eris, A. H. ;
Meral, I ;
Seyithanoglu, H. ;
Dundar, T. ;
Eren, F. ;
Unver, N. ;
Aydin, T. ;
Mayadagli, A. ;
Bayir, A. G. ;
Celikten, M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2018, 16 (02) :177-183