Dosimetric and Radiobiological Comparison of Five Techniques for Postmastectomy Radiotherapy with Simultaneous Integrated Boost

被引:5
作者
Tang, Du [1 ]
Liang, Zhan [1 ]
Guan, Fada [2 ]
Yang, Zhen [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp, Dept Oncol, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Div Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
NORMAL TISSUE; PREMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; BREAST-CANCER; RADIATION; TOMODIRECT; IRRADIATION; TOLERANCE;
D O I
10.1155/2020/9097352
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Purpose. To compare five techniques for the postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB). Materials and Methods. Twenty patients with left-sided breast cancer were retrospectively selected. Five treatment plans were created for each patient: TomoDirect (TD), unblocked helical TomoTherapy (unb-HT), blocked HT (b-HT), hybrid intensity-modulated radiotherapy (hy-IMRT), and fixed-field IMRT (ff-IMRT). A dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions to PTVtotal and 60.2 Gy in 28 fractions to PTVboost were prescribed. The dosimetric parameters for targets and organs at risk (OARs), the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), the second cancer complication probability (SCCP) for OARs, and the treatment efficiency were assessed and compared. Results. TD plans and hy-IMRT plans had similar good dose coverage and homogeneity for both PTVboost and PTVtota (l)and superior dose sparing for the lungs and heart. The ff-IMRT plans had similar dosimetric results for the target volumes compared with the TD and hy-IMRT plans, but gave a relatively higher NTCP and SCCP for the lungs. The unb-HT plans exhibited the highest OAR mean dose, highest NTCP for the lungs (0.97 +/- 1.25 parts per thousand) and heart (4.58 +/- 3.62%), and highest SCCP for the lungs (3.57 +/- 0.05%) and contralateral breast (2.75 +/- 0.29%) among all techniques. The b-HT plans significantly outperformed unb-HT plans with respect to the sparing of the lungs and heart. This technique also showed the best conformity index (0.73 +/- 0.08) for PTVboost and the optimal NTCP for the lungs (0.03 +/- 0.03 parts per thousand) and heart (0.61 +/- 0.73%). Concerning the delivery efficiency, the hy-IMRT and ff-IMRT achieved much higher delivery efficiency compared with TomoTherapy plans. Conclusion. Of the five techniques studied, TD and hy-IMRT are considered the preferable options for PMRT with SIB for left-sided breast cancer treatment and can be routinely applied in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comorbidities and intensity-modulated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost in elderly breast cancer patients
    Fiorentino, Alba
    Mazzola, Rosario
    Levra, Niccolo Giaj
    Fersino, Sergio
    Ricchetti, Francesco
    Di Paola, Gioacchino
    Gori, Stefania
    Massocco, Alberto
    Alongi, Filippo
    AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2018, 30 (05) : 533 - 538
  • [22] Plan robustness of simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy of prostate and lymph nodes for different image-guidance and delivery techniques
    Thornqvist, Sara
    Bentzen, Lise
    Petersen, Jorgen B. B.
    Hysing, Liv B.
    Muren, Ludvig P.
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2011, 50 (06) : 926 - 934
  • [23] Hypofractionated Radiotherapy With Simultaneous-integrated Boost After Breast-conserving Surgery Compared to Standard Boost-applications Using Helical Tomotherapy With TomoEdge
    Zwicker, Felix
    Hoefel, Sebastian
    Kirchner, Corinna
    Huber, Peter E.
    Debus, Juergen
    Schempp, Michael
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 41 (04) : 1909 - 1920
  • [24] Radiotherapy for the treatment of pituitary adenomas: A dosimetric comparison of three planning techniques
    Ramos-Prudencio, Rubi
    Ileana Perez-Alvarez, Sandra
    Haydee Flores-Balcazar, Christian
    Angelica de Leon-Alfaro, Mayra
    Alfredo Herrera-Gonzalez, Jose
    Elizalde-Cabrera, Jonathan
    Rubalcava-Ortega, Johnatan
    Espinoza-Alvarado, Lissett
    Ivan Balderrama-Ibarra, Ricardo
    REPORTS OF PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY AND RADIOTHERAPY, 2020, 25 (04) : 586 - 593
  • [25] Postmastectomy radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer patients: Comparison of advanced techniques
    Xie, Yibo
    Bourgeois, Daniel
    Guo, Beibei
    Zhang, Rui
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2020, 45 (01) : 34 - 40
  • [26] Intensity modulated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost vs. conventional radiotherapy with sequential boost for breast cancer - A preliminary result
    Lee, Hsin-Hua
    Hou, Ming-Feng
    Chuang, Hung-Yi
    Huang, Ming-Yii
    Tsuei, Le-Ping
    Chen, Fang-Ming
    Ou-Yang, Fu
    Huang, Chih-Jen
    BREAST, 2015, 24 (05) : 656 - 660
  • [27] Helical tomotherapy simultaneous integrated boost provides a dosimetric advantage in the treatment of primary intracranial tumors
    Baisden, Joseph M.
    Sheehan, Jason
    Reish, Andrew G.
    McIntosh, Alyson F.
    Sheng, Ke
    Read, Paul W.
    Benedict, Stanley H.
    Larner, James M.
    NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 33 (08) : 820 - 824
  • [28] Simultaneous Integrated Boost-Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer
    Franceschini, Davide
    Paiar, Fabiola
    Meattini, Icro
    Agresti, Benedetta
    Pasquetti, Eleonora Monteleone
    Greto, Daniela
    Bonomo, Pierluigi
    Marrazzo, Livia
    Casati, Marta
    Livi, Lorenzo
    Biti, Giampaolo
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2013, 123 (12) : E97 - E103
  • [29] Simultaneous Integrated Boost in Once-weekly Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer in the Elderly: Preliminary Evidence
    Bonzano, Elisabetta
    Belgioia, Liliana
    Polizzi, Giorgia
    Siffredi, Guido
    Fregatti, Piero
    Friedman, Daniele
    Garelli, Stefania
    Gusinu, Marco
    Vaccara, Elena Maria Luisa
    Guenzi, Marina
    Corvo, Renzo
    IN VIVO, 2019, 33 (06): : 1985 - 1992
  • [30] Dosimetric comparison of intensity modulated radiotherapy techniques and standard wedged tangents for whole breast radiotherapy
    Fong, Andrew
    Bromley, Regina
    Beat, Mardi
    Vien, Din
    Dineley, Jude
    Morgan, Graeme
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2009, 53 (01) : 92 - 99