Comparison of Different Headspace Gas Sampling Methods for the Analysis of Floral Scent from Lilium 'Siberia'

被引:0
|
作者
Kong, Y.
Sun, M.
Pan, H. T.
Zhang, Q. X.
机构
[1] Beijing Forestry Univ, Coll Landscape Artchitecture, Dept Ornamental Hort, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Natl Engn Res Ctr Floriculture, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Floral scent; Solid-phase microextraction; Direct thermal desorption; Lilium 'Siberia'; EXTRACTION; FLOWER;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) and direct thermal desorption (DTD) coupled to gas chromatography with mass spectrometry (GC/MS) were used to determine the floral scent composition of Lilium 'Siberia'. Three types of fiber coating 100 pm PDMS, 2 cm-50/30 mu m DVB/CAR/PDMS and 75 pm CAR/PDMS were employed for solid-phase microextraction sampling and Tenax OR was used as adsorbent for direct thermal desorption. The results demonstrated that the major floral scent components were monoterpenoids (73.78-98.52 %) and benzenoids (1.09-25.98 %). Linalool, (E)-beta-ocimene and methyl benzoate were the most major components Their total relative amounts were 83.28-97.92 %. In the tests, 26 compounds were separated by DTD-GC/MS, more than the other sampling mediums. As direct thermal desorption provided a more flexible sampling site. We considered that direct thermal desorption with Tenax GR absorbent is more suitable for Lilium flower fragrance sampling.
引用
收藏
页码:5175 / 5178
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Difference in Selectivity of Different Headspace Sampling Methods Combined with Multi-isotope Internal Standards for Quantitative Analysis of Aroma Compounds
    Ma L.
    Zheng X.
    Huang X.
    Sun H.
    Xu X.
    Dong X.
    Qin L.
    Shipin Kexue/Food Science, 2021, 42 (24): : 261 - 268
  • [42] HEADSPACE GAS SAMPLING GC METHOD FOR THE QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS OF VOLATILE COMPOUNDS IN CHEESE
    LIN, JCC
    JEON, IJ
    JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 1985, 50 (03) : 843 - &
  • [43] APPLICATION OF HEADSPACE SAMPLING GAS-CHROMATOGRAPHY TO ANALYSIS OF RESIDUAL VOLATILES IN SYNTHETIC RUBBERS
    PAUSCH, JB
    SOCKIS, I
    ELASTOMERICS, 1977, 109 (04): : 29 - 29
  • [44] Concrete gas permeability from different methods: Correlation analysis
    Zhang, Dongdong
    Li, Kefei
    CEMENT & CONCRETE COMPOSITES, 2019, 104
  • [45] Comparison of Methods for Sampling Particulate Emissions from Tires under Different Test Environments
    Hesse, David
    Feissel, Toni
    Kunze, Miles
    Bachmann, Eric
    Bachmann, Thomas
    Gramstat, Sebastian
    ATMOSPHERE, 2022, 13 (08)
  • [46] Comparison of two headspace sampling techniques for the analysis of off-flavour volatiles from oat based products
    Cognat, Claudine
    Shepherd, Tom
    Verrall, Susan R.
    Stewart, Derek
    FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2012, 134 (03) : 1592 - 1600
  • [47] COMPARISON OF VARIOUS SAMPLING METHODS FOR PCDDS AND PCDFS IN STACK GAS
    HAGENMAIER, H
    KRAFT, M
    JAGER, W
    MAYER, U
    LUTZKE, K
    SIEGEL, D
    CHEMOSPHERE, 1986, 15 (9-12) : 1187 - 1192
  • [48] Collection and analysis of organic acids in exhaust gas. Comparison of different methods
    Zervas, E
    Montagne, X
    Lahaye, J
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 33 (29) : 4953 - 4962
  • [49] COMPARISON OF METHODS OF SAMPLING FROM A POISSON PROCESS
    ELSAYYAD, GM
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1972, 34 (03) : 427 - 430
  • [50] Comparison of three different sampling methods for canine skin lipids
    Angelbeck-Schulze, Mandy
    Stahl, Jessica
    Brodesser, Susanne
    Rohn, Karl
    Naim, Hassan
    Hewicker-Trautwein, Marion
    Kietzmann, Manfred
    Baeumer, Wolfgang
    Mischke, Reinhard
    VETERINARY DERMATOLOGY, 2013, 24 (02) : 233 - e51