Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) for osteoporosis screening in US postmenopausal women: is it cost-effective?

被引:15
|
作者
Yang, J. [1 ]
Cosman, F. [2 ]
Stone, P. W. [3 ]
Li, M. [4 ]
Nieves, J. W. [5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Inst Social & Econ Res & Policy ISERP, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Med, New York, NY 10032 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Sch Nursing, New York, NY USA
[4] Univ Southern Calif, Leonard D Schaeffer Ctr Hlth Policy & Econ, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[5] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, New York, NY 10032 USA
[6] Hosp Special Surg, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
[7] Columbia Univ, Dept Epidemiol, 630 West 168th St,IHN PH 1512, New York, NY 10032 USA
[8] Columbia Univ, Inst Human Nutr, 630 West 168th St,IHN PH 1512, New York, NY 10032 USA
关键词
Cost-effectiveness; Osteoporosis; Postmenopausal women; Vertebral fracture; Vertebral fracture assessment; X-RAY-ABSORPTIOMETRY; BONE-MINERAL DENSITY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; NONVERTEBRAL FRACTURES; HIP FRACTURE; ALENDRONATE THERAPY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; ELDERLY-MEN; RISK; POPULATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00198-020-05588-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) is cost-effective when it was incorporated in the routine screening for osteoporosis in community-dwelling women aged >= 65 years, which support guidelines, such as the National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) for the diagnostic use of VFA as an important addition to fracture risk assessment. Introduction To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of VFA as a screening tool to reduce future fracture risk in US community-dwelling women aged >= 65 years. Methods An individual-level state-transition cost-effectiveness model from a healthcare perspective was constructed using derived data from published literature. The time horizon was lifetime. Five screening strategies were compared, including no screening at all, central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) only, VFA only, central DXA followed by VFA if the femoral neck T-score (FN-T) <= - 1.5, or if the FN-T <= - 1.0. Various initiation ages and rescreening intervals were evaluated. Oral bisphosphonate treatment for 5-year periods was assumed. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (2017 US dollars per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained) were used as the outcome measure. Results The incorporation of VFA slightly increased life expectancy by 0.1 years and reduced the number of subsequent osteoporotic fractures by 3.7% and 7.7% compared with using DXA alone and no screening, respectively, leading to approximately 30 billion dollars saved. Regardless of initiation ages and rescreening intervals, central DXA followed by VFA if the FN-T <= - 1.0 was most cost-effective ($40,792 per QALY when the screening is initiated at age 65 years and with rescreening every 5 years). Results were robust to change in VF incidence and medication costs. Conclusion In women aged >= 65 years, VFA is cost-effective when it was incorporated in routine screening for osteoporosis. Our findings support the National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) guidelines for the diagnostic use of VFA as an important addition to fracture risk assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:2321 / 2335
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis treatments in postmenopausal women using FRAX™ thresholds for decision
    Alzahouri, Kazem
    Bahrami, Stephane
    Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle
    Guillemin, Francis
    Roux, Christian
    JOINT BONE SPINE, 2013, 80 (01) : 64 - 69
  • [42] Spinal performance and functional impairment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and osteopenia without vertebral fracture
    Tsauo, JY
    Chien, MY
    Yang, RS
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 13 (06) : 456 - 460
  • [43] Which Women Should Be Selected for Vertebral Fracture Assessment? Comparing Different Methods of Targeting VFA
    Edward T. Middleton
    Eric D. Gardiner
    Susan A. Steel
    Calcified Tissue International, 2009, 85 : 203 - 210
  • [44] Is screening of Staghorn Stones cost-effective?
    Kavosh, Ali-Muhammad
    Aminsharifi, Ali-Reza
    Keshtkar, Vahid
    Jafari, Abdosaleh
    Abdollahifard, Gholamreza
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 16 (04) : 337 - 342
  • [45] Abaloparatide: an anabolic treatment to reduce fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis
    Miller, Paul D.
    Bilezikian, John P.
    Fitzpatrick, Lorraine A.
    Mitlak, Bruce
    McCloskey, Eugene, V
    Cosman, Felicia
    Bone, Henry G.
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2020, 36 (11) : 1861 - 1872
  • [46] Analysis of Related Factors of Brittle Hip Fracture in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis
    Zhuang, Hua-feng
    Wang, Pei-wen
    Li, Yi-zhong
    Lin, Jin-kuang
    Yao, Xue-dong
    Xu, Hao
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2020, 12 (01) : 194 - 198
  • [47] Vertebral fracture risk (VFR) score for fracture prediction in postmenopausal women
    Lillholm, M.
    Ghosh, A.
    Pettersen, P. C.
    de Bruijne, M.
    Dam, E. B.
    Karsdal, M. A.
    Christiansen, C.
    Genant, H. K.
    Nielsen, M.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 22 (07) : 2119 - 2128
  • [48] At what hip fracture risk is it cost-effective to treat?: International intervention thresholds for the treatment of osteoporosis
    Borgstroem, F.
    Johnell, O.
    Kanis, J. A.
    Joensson, B.
    Rehnberg, C.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 17 (10) : 1459 - 1471
  • [49] At what hip fracture risk is it cost-effective to treat?International intervention thresholds for the treatment of osteoporosis
    F. Borgström
    O. Johnell
    J. A. Kanis
    B. Jönsson
    C. Rehnberg
    Osteoporosis International, 2006, 17 : 1459 - 1471
  • [50] Vertebral Fracture Identification as Part of a Comprehensive Risk Assessment in Patients with Osteoporosis
    Schousboe, John T.
    CURRENT OSTEOPOROSIS REPORTS, 2018, 16 (05) : 573 - 583