Reliability and Safety Assessment for Human Involved Complex Spaceflight Tasks

被引：0

作者：

Zhou, Wenming ^{[1
]}

Ren, Liming ^{[1
]}

Li, Xiaopeng ^{[1
]}

Li, Fuqiu ^{[1
]}

Xiao, Yi ^{[2
]}

Chen, Lu ^{[1
]}

Zhang, Wei ^{[1
]}

Liu, Yan ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] China Astronaut Stand Inst, Dept Reliabil, 89 Xiaotun Rd, Beijing 100071, Peoples R China

[2] Astronaut Ctr China, Natl Key Lab Human Factors, 26 Beiqing Rd, Beijing 100094, Peoples R China

来源：

ADVANCES IN HUMAN ERROR, RELIABILITY, RESILIENCE, AND PERFORMANCE | 2019年 / 778卷

关键词：

Human factors; Human Involved Complex Spaceflight Tasks; Reliability; Safety;

D O I：

10.1007/978-3-319-94391-6_17

中图分类号：

TP18 [人工智能理论];

学科分类号：

081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;

摘要：

Recently, with the world-wide enthusiasm for exploring outer space and the development of astronautics technologies, Spaceflight tasks become more complicated. Human, system and environments exchanging information during the Human Involved Complex Spaceflight Tasks (HICSTs), makes comprehensive analysis of safety and reliability a critical problem to solve. We have to determine the safety and reliability of HICSTs before the tasks are implemented. This paper analyzes factors which influence the safety and reliability of HICSTs, and study the interdependent relation among human, system and environments. Then we make further study on safety and reliability modeling and assessment methodologies and provide a systematic method to assess the reliability and safety for the HICSTs. Finally, we choose a typical HICST to explain how to model and evaluate the reliability and safety of a HICST. The results show that the method proposed in this paper is effective. The further study and development trends of this are also outlined.

引用

页码：176 / 188

页数：13

共 50 条

[21] Operation safety and reliability improvement of large transport systems by complex sensitivity investigation
Moos, Petr
NEURAL NETWORK WORLD, 2008, 18 (01) : 39 - 43
[22] Towards the Human-Machine Interaction: Strategies, Design, and Human Reliability Assessment of Crews' Response to Daily Cargo Ship Navigation Tasks
Han, Su
Wang, Tengfei
Chen, Jiaqi
Wang, Ying
Zhu, Bo
Zhou, Yiqi
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (15)
[23] From cognitive reliability to competence? An evolving approach to human factors and safety
Re, Alessandra
Macchi, Luigi
COGNITION TECHNOLOGY & WORK, 2010, 12 (02) : 79 - 85
[24] From cognitive reliability to competence? An evolving approach to human factors and safety
Alessandra Re
Luigi Macchi
Cognition, Technology & Work, 2010, 12 : 79 - 85
[25] Workforce perceptions of human factors as indicators of plant reliability and process safety
Antonovsky, Ari
Straker, Leon
Pollock, Clare
ERGONOMICS, 2021, 64 (02) : 171 - 183
[26] Reliability assessment process for complex electronic systems
Kras, A.
Mrak, Z.
Annals of DAAAM for 2005 & Proceedings of the 16th International DAAAM Symposium: INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING & AUTOMATION: FOCUS ON YOUNG RESEARCHES AND SCIENTISTS, 2005, : 209 - 210
[27] Widening the scope of human factors safety assessment for decommissioning
Owen, C.
Healey, A. N.
Benn, J.
COGNITION TECHNOLOGY & WORK, 2013, 15 (01) : 59 - 66
[28] Method of Developing Unified Model for Estimating Safety and Reliability of Complex Systems for Critical Application
Volochiy, Bohdan
Ozirkovskyy, Leonid
2018 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED TRENDS IN RADIOELECTRONICS, TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING (TCSET), 2018, : 801 - 804
[29] A taxonomy of performance influencing factors for human reliability analysis of emergency tasks
Kim, JW
Jung, WD
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2003, 16 (06) : 479 - 495
[30] Safety Protocol for Collaborative Human-Robot Recycling Tasks
Medina, Angie C.
Mora, Juan F.
Martinez, Carol
Barrero, Nicolas
Hernandez, Wilson
IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2019, 52 (13): : 2008 - 2013

← 1 2 3 4 5 →