Morphological and anatomical modifications in winter barley culm after late plant growth regulator treatment

被引:18
作者
Sanvicente, P
Lazarevitch, S
Blouet, A
Guckert, A
机构
[1] ENSAIA, INRA, Lab Agron & Environm, F-54505 Vandoeuvre Nancy, France
[2] Acad Agron Bielorussie, Chaire Genet & Bot, Gorki 213410, Russia
关键词
anatomy; barley; chlormequat chloride; ethephon; imazaquin; stem shortening;
D O I
10.1016/S1161-0301(99)00017-9
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
One of the major factors limiting yield production in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) has been its poor straw strength. Consequently, a greater stiffness of the upper part of the culm was desirable. So, a late application of plant growth regulator could be interesting for weak-strawed barley cultivars. The objective of these experiments was to investigate the effect of a late application of a combination of chlormequat chloride (2-chloroethyl-trimethyl-ammonium chloride), ethephon (2-chloroethyl phosphonic acid) and imazaquin (2-[4-isopropyl-4-methyl-5-oxo-2-imidazolin-2-yl] nicotinic acid) on the morphological and anatomical characteristics of barley main stems. In a field trial and a greenhouse experiment, a foliar treatment was applied to a two-row winter barley (Labea) at growth stage 7 (Feekes, 1941). Measurements of plant height, internode lengths, dry weights and microscopic examination of cross-sections of the top three internodes were made at anthesis. The plant growth regulator (PGR) decreased significantly plant height by reducing the length of the upper internodes. The PGR did not modify the total weight of the upper internodes, but induced an increase of the dry weight per unit length of the main stem. The shortening of the internodes combined with the higher density of the tissues contributes to the stiffness of the stem. This was confirmed by anatomical studies which showed the modifications of the supporting tissues. The application of the plant growth regulator did not affect grain yield. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 51
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Timing and rate of ethephon application to two-row and six-row spring barley [J].
Bridger, GM ;
Klinck, HR ;
Smith, DL .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1995, 87 (06) :1198-1206
[2]   YIELD AND GRAIN PROTEIN RESPONSE OF SPRING BARLEY TO ETHEPHON AND TRIADIMEFON [J].
BULMAN, P ;
SMITH, DL .
CROP SCIENCE, 1993, 33 (04) :798-803
[3]   A COMPARISON OF ETHEPHON ALONE AND IN COMBINATION WITH CCC OR DPC APPLIED TO SPRING BARLEY [J].
CALDWELL, CD ;
MELLISH, DR ;
NORRIE, J .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1988, 68 (04) :941-946
[4]   HEIGHT AND YIELD RESPONSE OF SELECTED WHEAT, BARLEY, AND TRITICALE CULTIVARS TO ETHEPHON [J].
DAHNOUS, K ;
VIGUE, GT ;
LAW, AG ;
KONZAK, CF ;
MILLER, DG .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1982, 74 (03) :580-582
[5]   VARIATION IN CULM ANATOMY AMONG BARLEY CULTIVARS DIFFERING IN LODGING RESISTANCE [J].
DUNN, GJ ;
BRIGGS, KG .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE BOTANIQUE, 1989, 67 (06) :1838-1843
[6]  
Feekes W., 1941, VERSLAGEN TECHNISCHE, V17, P523
[7]  
GURR E, 1956, PRACTICAL MANUAL MED, P413
[8]  
JEZOWSKI S, 1981, GENET POL, V22, P45
[9]  
JUNG J., 1966, Proceedings 8th Brit. Weed Control Conf., 1966, P245
[10]  
JUNG J, 1964, CCC RES S GEN, P43