Impact of positron emission tomography/computed tomography surveillance at 12 and 24 months for detecting head and neck cancer recurrence

被引:105
作者
Ho, Allen S. [1 ]
Tsao, Gabriel J. [1 ]
Chen, Frank W. [1 ]
Shen, Tianjie [1 ]
Kaplan, Michael J. [1 ]
Colevas, A. Dimitrios [1 ,2 ]
Fischbein, Nancy J. [3 ]
Quon, Andrew [4 ]
Quynh-Thu Le [1 ,5 ]
Pinto, Harlan A. [1 ,2 ]
Fee, Willard E., Jr. [1 ]
Sunwoo, John B. [1 ]
Sirjani, Davud [1 ]
Hara, Wendy [5 ]
Yao, Mike [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Oncol, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Div Nucl Med & Mol Imaging, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
关键词
positron emission tomography; computed tomography; integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography; head and neck cancer; salvage therapy; surveillance; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; PULMONARY METASTASES; DISTANT METASTASES; SALVAGE SURGERY; F-18-FDG PET; FDG-PET; CT; RESECTION; MODALITIES; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.27892
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: In head and neck cancer (HNC), 3-month post-treatment positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) reliably identifies persistent/recurrent disease. However, further PET/CT surveillance has unclear benefit. The impact of post-treatment PET/CT surveillance on outcomes is assessed at 12 and 24 months. METHODS: A 10-year retrospective analysis of HNC patients was carried out with long-term serial imaging. Imaging at 3 months included either PET/CT or magnetic resonance imaging, with all subsequent imaging comprised of PET/CT. PET/CT scans at 12 and 24 months were evaluated only if preceding interval scans were negative. Of 1114 identified patients, 284 had 3-month scans, 175 had 3- and 12-month scans, and 77 had 3-, 12-, and 24-month scans. RESULTS: PET/CT detection rates in clinically occult patients were 9% (15 of 175) at 12 months, and 4% (3 of 77) at 24 months. No difference in outcomes was identified between PET/CT-detected and clinically detected recurrences, with similar 3-year disease-free survival (41% vs 46%, P = .91) and 3-year overall survival (60% vs 54%, P = .70) rates. Compared with 3-month PET/CT, 12-month PET/CT demonstrated fewer equivocal reads (26% vs 10%, P < .001). Of scans deemed equivocal, 6% (5 of 89) were ultimately found to be positive. CONCLUSIONS: HNC patients with negative 3-month imaging appear to derive limited benefit from subsequent PET/CT surveillance. No survival differences were observed between PET/CT-detected and clinically detected recurrences, although larger prospective studies are needed for further investigation. Cancer 2013. (c) 2012 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:1349 / 1356
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Identification of Distant Metastases With Positron-Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography in Patients With Previously Untreated Head and Neck Cancer
    Gourin, Christine G.
    Watts, Tammara L.
    Williams, Hadyn T.
    Patel, Vijay S.
    Bilodeau, Paul A.
    Coleman, Teresa A.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2008, 118 (04) : 671 - 675
  • [42] Budget impact from the incorporation of positron emission tomography - computed tomography for staging lung cancers
    Biz, Aline Navega
    Caetano, Rosangela
    REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2015, 49
  • [43] Clinical use of combined positron emission tomography and computed tomography in thymoma recurrence
    El-Bawab, Hatem Y.
    Abouzied, Mohei M.
    Rafay, Mohammed A.
    Hajjar, Waseem M.
    Saleh, Waleed M.
    Alkattan, Khaled M.
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2010, 11 (04) : 395 - 399
  • [44] THE ROLE OF COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF THE NECK AFTER CHEMORADIOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH HEAD-AND-NECK CANCER
    Clavel, Sebastien
    Charron, Marie-Pierre
    Belair, Manon
    Delouya, Guila
    Fortin, Bernard
    Despres, Philippe
    Soulieres, Denis
    Filion, Edith
    Guertin, Louis
    Phuc Felix Nguyen-Tan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 82 (02): : 567 - 573
  • [45] Role of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Breast Cancer
    Bourgeois, Austin C.
    Warren, Lance A.
    Chang, Ted T.
    Embry, Scott
    Hudson, Kathleen
    Bradley, Yong C.
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2013, 51 (05) : 781 - +
  • [46] Positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose for suspected head and neck tumor recurrence in the symptomatic patient
    Lonneux, M
    Lawson, G
    Ide, C
    Bausart, R
    Remacle, M
    Pauwels, S
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2000, 110 (09) : 1493 - 1497
  • [47] An economic evaluation of positron emission tomography (PET) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the diagnosis of breast cancer recurrence
    Auguste, P.
    Barton, P.
    Hyde, C.
    Roberts, T. E.
    HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2011, 15 (18) : 1 - +
  • [48] Revisiting the Role of Positron-Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Determining the Need for Planned Neck Dissection Following Chemoradiation for Advanced Head and Neck Cancer
    Gourin, Christine G.
    Boyce, Brian J.
    Williams, Hadyn T.
    Herdman, Anne V.
    Bilodeau, Paul A.
    Coleman, Teresa A.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2009, 119 (11) : 2150 - 2155
  • [49] Evaluation of hypoxia in a feline model of head and neck cancer using 64Cu-ATSM positron emission tomography/computed tomography
    Ballegeer, Elizabeth A.
    Madrill, Nicole J.
    Berger, Kevin L.
    Agnew, Dalen W.
    McNiel, Elizabeth A.
    BMC CANCER, 2013, 13
  • [50] Comparison of patient stratification by computed tomography radiomics and hypoxia positron emission tomography in head-and-neck cancer radiotherapy
    Fernandez, Jairo A. Socarras
    Moennich, David
    Leibfarth, Sara
    Welz, Stefan
    Zwanenburg, Alex
    Leger, Stefan
    Loeck, Steffen
    Pfannenberg, Christina
    La Fougere, Christian
    Reischl, Gerald
    Baumann, Michael
    Zips, Daniel
    Thorwarth, Daniela
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 15 : 52 - 59