Age- and sex-specific normal values for shock index in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2008 for ages 8 years and older

被引:34
作者
Rappaport, Lara D. [1 ,2 ]
Deakyne, Sara [1 ,2 ]
Carcillo, Joseph A. [3 ]
McFann, Kim [4 ]
Sills, Marion R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp Colorado, Aurora, CO USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Sect Emergency Med, Aurora, CO USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Crit Med & Pediat, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Colorado Sch Publ Hlth, Colorado Biostat Consortium, Denver, CO 80202 USA
关键词
VITAL SIGNS; BLOOD-PRESSURE; INJURY; RESUSCITATION; UTILITY; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajem.2013.01.014
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Purpose: Shock index (SI), the ratio of heart rate to systolic blood pressure, has found to outperform conventional vital signs as a predictor of shock. Although age-specific vital sign norms are recommended in screening for shock, there are no reported age-or sex-specific norms for SI. Our primary goal was to report age-and sex-specific SI normal values for a nationally representative population 10 years and older by 5-year age groups. A secondary goal was to report SI normal values for children ages 8 to 19 years by 1-year age groups. Basic procedures: Weighted data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2008 data sets were used to generate age-and sex-specific percentile curves of SI for subjects 8 years and older. Main findings: The primary analysis included 33906 subjects (101837 weighted) 10 years and older. The secondary analysis included 13393 subjects (37983 weighted) 8 to 19 years old. Normalized SI values for each percentile decreased with increasing age and were higher for females across all ages. The most commonly cited SI threshold of 0.9 exceeded the 97th percentile for males younger than 25 years and for females younger than 40 years. Conclusions: This first report of age-and sex-specific normal values for SI indicates that SI norms vary by age and sex. Just as age-specific vital sign norms are recommended in screening for shock, our findings suggest that age-and sex-specific SI norms may be more effective in screening for shock than a single-value threshold. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:838 / 842
页数:5
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   SHOCK-INDEX [J].
ALLGOWER, M ;
BURRI, C .
DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1967, 92 (43) :1947-&
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[3]   A Simple Clinical Model Composed of ECG, Shock Index, and Arterial Blood Gas Analysis for Predicting Severe Pulmonary Embolism [J].
Bircan, Ahmet ;
Karadeniz, Nuriye ;
Ozden, Ahmet ;
Cakir, Munire ;
Varol, Ercan ;
Oyar, Orhan ;
Ozaydin, Mehmet .
CLINICAL AND APPLIED THROMBOSIS-HEMOSTASIS, 2011, 17 (02) :188-196
[4]   Shock index in diagnosing early acute hypovolemia [J].
Birkhahn, RH ;
Gaeta, TJ ;
Terry, D ;
Bove, JJ ;
Tloczkowski, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 23 (03) :323-326
[5]   The ability of traditional vital signs and shock index to identify ruptured ectopic pregnancy [J].
Birkhahn, RH ;
Gaeta, TJ ;
Van Deusen, SK ;
Tloczkowski, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (05) :1293-1296
[6]   Utility of the Shock Index in Predicting Mortality in Traumatically Injured Patients [J].
Cannon, Chad M. ;
Braxton, Carla C. ;
Kling-Smith, Mendy ;
Mahnken, Jonathan D. ;
Carlton, Elizabeth ;
Moncure, Michael .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2009, 67 (06) :1426-1430
[7]   Exploration of Prehospital Vital Sign Trends for the Prediction of Trauma Outcomes [J].
Chen, Liangyou ;
Reisner, Andrew T. ;
Gribok, Andrei ;
Reifman, Jaques .
PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2009, 13 (03) :286-294
[9]  
Dente C, 2011, J TRAUMA, V70, P388
[10]  
Fuchs S., 2012, APLS PEDIAT EMERGENC