The concept of universality in Oleg Drobnitskii's moral philosophy

被引:1
作者
Apressyan, Ruben [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Russian Acad Sci, Inst Philosophy, Moscow, Russia
[2] Yaroslav Wise Novgorod State Univ, Novgorod, Russia
基金
俄罗斯科学基金会;
关键词
Oleg Drobnitskii; Universality; Ethics; Normative regulation of behavior; Individual moral task; Historicism; BRITISH PHILOSOPHERS; DISCUSSIONS; SOVIET;
D O I
10.1007/s11212-020-09381-3
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The article analyzes the concept of universality in Oleg Drobnitskii's ethics. As opposed to most Soviet ethicists of the 1960s and early 1970s, Drobnitskii viewed this concept along the lines of the principle of universality presented in the moral theories of Immanuel Kant and Richard Hare. However, while they considered universality to be a feature of individual moral thinking in the forms of maxims, principles, and evaluations, Drobnitskii understood universality as the main feature of moral requirements and essentially external to the moral agent, representing to her social relations and the 'general laws of history.' It was conceptually significant in Drobnitskii's approach to universality that he analyzed it within the context of a more general concept of morality-as a mode of normative regulation of behavior. In this capacity, universality was presented as a characteristic of general appeal, or the general way in which a moral requirement is binding. The principle of equality is a normative correlate of universality understood in this way. Universality also characterizes judgments, whose moral adequacy is verified through the procedure of universalization. Regarding universality, Drobnitskii discussed important questions of the individualization of the universal moral requirement in the form of the moral agent's personal task and the universality of class moral views. He tried to explain these differing, and not always interconnected, aspects of universality by appealing to certain 'general laws of history,' and thus offered a historicist basis of morality. This article shows that, despite this unprecedented (for Soviet ethical literature) analysis of the issue of universality, Drobnitskii did not achieve a systematic conclusion in his conceptualization of universality. Nevertheless, he was able to offer a number of significant insights, with the potential to aid our further comprehension of the phenomenon of universality and how it ought to be understood.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 112
页数:18
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Adorno T, 1970, NEGATIVE DIALECTICS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1977, PROBLEMY NRAVSTVENNO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1972, ESSAYS MORAL CONCEPT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1817, The Encylopaedia Logic: Part 1 of the Encyclopaedia of Philosophical Sciences
[5]  
Apresyan RG, 2013, VOP FILOS, P39
[6]  
Bauman Z., 1993, POSTMODERN ETHICS
[7]   MORAL CONSCIOUSNESS AND ITS STRUCTURE [J].
DROBNITS.OG .
SOVIET STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY, 1972, 11 (03) :224-247
[8]   SOVIET-BRITISH DISCUSSIONS ON PROBLEMS OF ETHICS [J].
DROBNITS.OG .
SOVIET STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY, 1971, 10 (02) :187-194
[9]  
Drobnitskii O. G., 2002, MORAL PHILOS SELECTE, P11
[10]  
Drobnitskii O. G., 1967, FILOSOFSKAIA ENTSIKL, V4, P100