Effect of information on prostate biopsy history on biopsy outcomes in the era of MRI-targeted biopsies

被引:2
作者
Lantz, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Haug, Erik Skaaheim [3 ]
Picker, Wolfgang [4 ]
Crippa, Alessio [1 ]
Jaderling, Fredrik [2 ,5 ]
Mortezavi, Ashkan [1 ]
Nordstrom, Tobias [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Epidemiol & Biostat, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Dept Mol Med & Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Vestfold Hosp Trust, Sect Urol, Tonsberg, Norway
[4] Aleris Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, Oslo, Norway
[5] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Stockholm, Sweden
[6] Karolinska Inst, Danderyd Hosp, Dept Clin Sci, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Prostate cancer; Prostate neoplasm; Prostate biopsy; Targeted biopsy; Magnetic resonance imaging; MRI; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; CANCER RISK; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-020-03277-x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose To describe the predictive value of information on previous benign biopsy for the outcome of MRI-targeted biopsies. Methods An exploratory analysis was conducted using data from a prospective, multicenter, paired diagnostic study of 532 men undergoing diagnostics for prostate cancer during 2016-2017. All men underwent 1.5 T MRI; systematic prostate biopsies; and MRI-targeted biopsies to MRI lesions with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2, PI-RADS >= 3. The main outcome was numbers of detected prostate cancer characterized by grade group (GG) where GG >= 2 defined clinically significant cancer (csPCa). Results Men with previous biopsies had significantly more often negative MRI (26% vs. 17%,p < 0.05) compared to men without previous biopsies. Men with previous biopsies showed higher rates of benign biopsies (41% vs. 26%,p < 0.05) and lower rates of GG2 (17% vs. 30%,p < 0.05) and GG >= 3 (5% vs. 10%,p < 0.05) cancer. Biopsy-naive men had higher proportions of highly suspicious MRI lesions (PIRADS 5;p < 0.05) and a higher proportion of significant cancer in those lesions (p = 0.05). In multivariate regression analysis, a previous benign prostate biopsy was associated with less than half the odds of csPCa (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.20-0.71). Conclusion In this large prospective multicenter trial, we showed that men with a previous prostate biopsy had higher proportions of MRIs without lesions and lower proportion of highly suspicious lesions than biopsy-naive men. Further, biopsy-naive men showed higher detection of clinically significant cancer when using MRI-targeted biopsies. Also, in the era of MRI-targeted biopsy strategies, biopsy history should be carefully considered in biopsy decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:1153 / 1159
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   MRI-Targeted, Systematic, and Combined Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis [J].
Ahdoot, Michael ;
Wilbur, Andrew R. ;
Reese, Sarah E. ;
Lebastchi, Amir H. ;
Mehralivand, Sherif ;
Gomella, Patrick T. ;
Bloom, Jonathan ;
Gurram, Sandeep ;
Siddiqui, Minhaj ;
Pinsky, Paul ;
Parnes, Howard ;
Linehan, W. Marston ;
Merino, Maria ;
Choyke, Peter L. ;
Shih, Joanna H. ;
Turkbey, Baris ;
Wood, Bradford J. ;
Pinto, Peter A. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 382 (10) :917-928
[2]   A Randomized Controlled Trial To Assess and Compare the Outcomes of Two-core Prostate Biopsy Guided by Fused Magnetic Resonance and Transrectal Ultrasound Images and Traditional 12-core Systematic Biopsy [J].
Baco, Eduard ;
Rud, Erik ;
Eri, Lars Magne ;
Moen, Gunnar ;
Vlatkovic, Ljiljana ;
Svindland, Aud ;
Eggesbo, Heidi B. ;
Ukimura, Osamu .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (01) :149-156
[3]   Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer [J].
Drost, Frank-Jan H. ;
Osses, Daniel F. ;
Nieboer, Daan ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. ;
Bangma, Chris H. ;
Roobol, Monique J. ;
Schoots, Ivo G. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, (04)
[4]   Is There Still a Need for Repeated Systematic Biopsies in Patients with Previous Negative Biopsies in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies of the Prostate? [J].
Exterkate, Leonie ;
Wegelin, Olivier ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
van der Leest, Marloes G. ;
Kummer, J. Alain ;
Vreuls, Willem ;
de Bruin, Peter C. ;
Bosch, J. L. H. Ruud ;
van Melick, Harm H. E. ;
Somford, Diederik M. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2020, 3 (02) :216-223
[5]   Prostate Cancer Diagnostics Using a Combination of the Stockholm3 Blood Test and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging [J].
Gronberg, Henrik ;
Eklund, Martin ;
Picker, Wolfgang ;
Aly, Markus ;
Jaderling, Fredrik ;
Adolfsson, Jan ;
Landquist, Martin ;
Haug, Erik Skaaheim ;
Strom, Peter ;
Carlsson, Stefan ;
Nordstrom, Tobias .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2018, 74 (06) :722-728
[6]   MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis [J].
Kasivisvanathan, V ;
Rannikko, A. S. ;
Borghi, M. ;
Panebianco, V ;
Mynderse, L. A. ;
Vaarala, M. H. ;
Briganti, A. ;
Budaus, L. ;
Hellawell, G. ;
Hindley, R. G. ;
Roobol, M. J. ;
Eggener, S. ;
Ghei, M. ;
Villers, A. ;
Bladou, F. ;
Villeirs, G. M. ;
Virdi, J. ;
Boxler, S. ;
Robert, G. ;
Singh, P. B. ;
Venderink, W. ;
Hadaschik, B. A. ;
Ruffion, A. ;
Hu, J. C. ;
Margolis, D. ;
Crouzet, S. ;
Klotz, L. ;
Taneja, S. S. ;
Pinto, P. ;
Gill, I ;
Allen, C. ;
Giganti, F. ;
Freeman, A. ;
Morris, S. ;
Punwani, S. ;
Williams, N. R. ;
Brew-Graves, C. ;
Deeks, J. ;
Takwoingi, Y. ;
Emberton, M. ;
Moore, C. M. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 378 (19) :1767-1777
[7]   EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent [J].
Mottet, Nicolas ;
Bellmunt, Joaquim ;
Bolla, Michel ;
Briers, Erik ;
Cumberbatch, Marcus G. ;
De Santis, Maria ;
Fossati, Nicola ;
Gross, Tobias ;
Henry, Ann M. ;
Joniau, Steven ;
Lam, Thomas B. ;
Mason, Malcolm D. ;
Matveev, Vsevolod B. ;
Moldovan, Paul C. ;
van den Bergh, Roderick C. N. ;
Van den Broeck, Thomas ;
van der Poel, Henk G. ;
van der Kwast, Theo H. ;
Rouviere, Olivier ;
Schoots, Ivo G. ;
Wiegel, Thomas ;
Cornford, Philip .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 71 (04) :618-629
[8]   Diagnostic Pathway with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Standard Pathway: Results from a Randomized Prospective Study in Biopsy-naive Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer [J].
Porpiglia, Francesco ;
Manfredi, Matteo ;
Mele, Fabrizio ;
Cossu, Marco ;
Bollito, Enrico ;
Veltri, Andrea ;
Cirillo, Stefano ;
Regge, Daniele ;
Faletti, Riccardo ;
Passera, Roberto ;
Fiori, Cristian ;
De Luca, Stefano .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 72 (02) :282-288
[9]   Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Advanced Risk Modeling of Prostate Cancer-Patient-tailored Risk Stratification Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies [J].
Radtke, Jan Philipp ;
Wiesenfarth, Manuel ;
Kesch, Claudia ;
Freitag, Martin T. ;
Alt, Celine D. ;
Celik, Kamil ;
Distler, Florian ;
Roth, Wilfried ;
Wieczorek, Kathrin ;
Stock, Christian ;
Duensing, Stefan ;
Roethke, Matthias C. ;
Teber, Dogu ;
Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter ;
Hohenfellner, Markus ;
Bonekamp, David ;
Hadaschik, Boris A. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 72 (06) :888-896
[10]   Prediction of Prostate Cancer Risk: The Role of Prostate Volume and Digital Rectal Examination in the ERSPC Risk Calculators [J].
Roobol, Monique J. ;
van Vugt, Heidi A. ;
Loeb, Stacy ;
Zhu, Xiaoye ;
Bul, Meelan ;
Bangma, Chris H. ;
van Leenders, Arno G. L. J. H. ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. ;
Schroder, Fritz H. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 61 (03) :577-583