THE EFFECT OF A PROBIOTIC PREPARATION CONTAINING BACILLUS SUBTILIS ATCC PTA-6737 ON EGG PRODUCTION AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS OF LAYING HENS

被引:52
作者
Sobczak, Alicja [1 ]
Kozlowski, Krzysztof [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warmia & Mazury, Dept Poultry Sci, Oczapowskiego 5, PL-10718 Olsztyn, Poland
关键词
laying hens; Bacillus subtilis; performance; egg quality; YOLK CHOLESTEROL; LACTOBACILLUS-ACIDOPHILUS; PEDIOCOCCUS-ACIDILACTICI; DIETARY SUPPLEMENTATION; NUTRIENT DIGESTIBILITY; MICROFLORA COMPOSITION; PRODUCTION PERFORMANCE; EGGSHELL QUALITY; IMMUNE-RESPONSE; LATE-PHASE;
D O I
10.1515/aoas-2015-0040
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
A total of 288 Lohmann Brown laying hens were randomly divided into two groups (9 replicates of 16 birds each). The hens were housed in three-tier battery cages for 26 weeks, including a two-week pre-laying period. All birds were fed iso-nitrogenous and iso-caloric diets, and had free access to water. Control group (C) hens were fed a basal diet, and experimental group (BS) hens received a basal diet supplemented with a commercial probiotic preparation of Bacillus subtilis ATCC PTA-6737 at 1x10(8) CFU/kg feed. The number and weight of eggs laid, feed intake, feed conversion, egg quality, the fatty acid profile and cholesterol content of yolk lipids, and selected blood biochemical parameters of hens were determined throughout the experiment. No significant differences (P>0.05) were noted between the groups in average egg weight, laying performance (%), daily feed intake or feed conversion. Eggs laid by BS group hens received significantly higher scores for yolk color (Roche yolk color fan) and albumen quality (Haugh units), and they were characterized by a significant improvement in shell thickness and breaking strength (P<0.05) in comparison with eggs laid by control group hens. No significant differences (P>0.05) were observed between the groups in the fatty acid profile of yolk lipids, except for a significant increase (P<0.05) in oleic acid concentrations in group BS. No significant differences (P>0.05) were noted between the groups in selected blood biochemical parameters of laying hens. Group BS eggs had a significantly lower (P<0.05) cholesterol content of yolk lipids. It can be concluded that a probiotic preparation containing Bacillus subtilis ATCC PTA-6737 had a beneficial influence on selected performance parameters of laying hens, egg quality and the cholesterol content of yolk lipids.
引用
收藏
页码:711 / 723
页数:13
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Effects of dietary probiotic inclusion on performance, eggshell quality, cecal microflora composition, and tibia traits of laying hens in the late phase of production [J].
Abdelqader, Anas ;
Irshaid, Rabie ;
Al-Fataftah, Abdur-Rahman .
TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2013, 45 (04) :1017-1024
[2]   Effects of dietary Bacillus subtilis and inulin supplementation on performance, eggshell quality, intestinal morphology and microflora composition of laying hens in the late phase of production [J].
Abdelqader, Anas ;
Al-Fataftah, Abdur-Rahman ;
Das, Guerbuez .
ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 179 (1-4) :103-111
[3]   The influence of Lactobacillus acidophilus and bacitracin on layer performance of chickens and cholesterol content of plasma and egg yolk [J].
Abdulrahim, SM ;
Haddadin, MSY ;
Hashlamoun, EAR ;
Robinson, RK .
BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 1996, 37 (02) :341-346
[4]  
Afsari M., 2014, Annual Research & Review in Biology, V4, P198, DOI 10.9734/ARRB/2014/5212
[5]  
Aghaei A, 2010, J ANIM VET ADV, V9, P1996
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food
[7]  
Balevi T., 2009, Archiva Zootechnica, V12, P14
[8]   Effects of Enterococcus faecium M 74 strain on selected blood and production parameters of laying hens [J].
Capcarova, M. ;
Chmelnicna, L. ;
Kolesarova, A. ;
Massanyi, P. ;
Kovacik, J. .
BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (05) :614-620
[9]  
Chung SungHeon Chung SungHeon, 2015, International Journal of Poultry Science, V14, P19
[10]  
Dankowiakowska A., 2013, Journal of Central European Agriculture, V14, P467, DOI 10.5513/JCEA01/14.1.1222